Seek Returns logo

BA vs. UBER: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at BA and UBER, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolBAUBER
Company NameThe Boeing CompanyUber Technologies, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryAerospace & DefenseGround Transportation
Market Capitalization176.46 billion USD189.42 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJanuary 2, 1962May 10, 2019
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of BA and UBER by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

BA vs. UBER: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolBAUBER
5-Day Price Return2.66%-1.99%
13-Week Price Return17.55%3.10%
26-Week Price Return26.28%29.78%
52-Week Price Return42.19%31.14%
Month-to-Date Return5.20%3.51%
Year-to-Date Return31.85%50.58%
10-Day Avg. Volume6.02M21.46M
3-Month Avg. Volume8.67M21.23M
3-Month Volatility27.11%32.88%
Beta1.511.49

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

BA

2,402.16%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
43.89%
Q3
22.42%
Median
12.50%
Q1
5.21%
Min
-6.24%

BA’s Return on Equity of 2,402.16% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

UBER

62.42%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
22.11%
Q3
13.84%
Median
9.66%
Q1
7.55%
Min
0.36%

UBER’s Return on Equity of 62.42% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Ground Transportation industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

BA vs. UBER: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

BA

-14.18%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
14.54%
Q3
8.08%
Median
6.17%
Q1
2.49%
Min
-1.63%

BA has a negative Net Profit Margin of -14.18%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

UBER

26.68%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
32.20%
Q3
18.59%
Median
7.11%
Q1
4.13%
Min
-10.38%

A Net Profit Margin of 26.68% places UBER in the upper quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

BA vs. UBER: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

BA

-12.27%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
16.63%
Q3
10.38%
Median
8.29%
Q1
6.21%
Min
0.95%

BA has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -12.27%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

UBER

9.03%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
41.31%
Q3
23.16%
Median
11.33%
Q1
6.82%
Min
-12.08%

UBER’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.03% is around the midpoint for the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

BA vs. UBER: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolBAUBER
Return on Equity (TTM)2,402.16%62.42%
Return on Assets (TTM)-7.06%24.38%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-14.18%26.68%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-12.27%9.03%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)-0.32%33.93%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

BA

1.23

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
3.09
Q3
1.98
Median
1.23
Q1
1.03
Min
0.02

BA’s Current Ratio of 1.23 aligns with the median group of the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

UBER

1.11

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.03
Q3
1.26
Median
0.89
Q1
0.73
Min
0.38

UBER’s Current Ratio of 1.11 aligns with the median group of the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

BA vs. UBER: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

BA

117.95

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
1.70
Q3
1.04
Median
0.68
Q1
0.41
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 117.95, BA operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Aerospace & Defense industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

UBER

0.42

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.51
Q3
1.51
Median
1.06
Q1
0.47
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, UBER’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.42 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

BA vs. UBER: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

BA

-3.60

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
36.57
Q3
19.90
Median
7.04
Q1
2.40
Min
-7.63

BA has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -3.60. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

UBER

-0.24

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
51.07
Q3
22.54
Median
7.94
Q1
2.72
Min
-24.57

UBER has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -0.24. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

BA vs. UBER: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolBAUBER
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.231.11
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.380.97
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)117.950.42
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-3.60-0.24

Growth

Revenue Growth

BA vs. UBER: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

BA vs. UBER: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

BA

0.09%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
2.03%
Q3
1.22%
Median
0.43%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

BA’s Dividend Yield of 0.09% is consistent with its peers in the Aerospace & Defense industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

UBER

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.44%
Q3
2.49%
Median
1.53%
Q1
0.39%
Min
0.00%

UBER currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

BA vs. UBER: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

BA

0.00%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
83.87%
Q3
49.90%
Median
16.48%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

BA has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

UBER

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
137.07%
Q3
74.71%
Median
41.16%
Q1
15.12%
Min
0.00%

UBER has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

BA vs. UBER: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolBAUBER
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.09%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

BA

--

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
65.97
Q3
54.11
Median
34.53
Q1
23.66
Min
0.00

P/E Ratio data for BA is currently unavailable.

UBER

14.99

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
42.59
Q3
24.86
Median
16.38
Q1
12.79
Min
4.37

UBER’s P/E Ratio of 14.99 is within the middle range for the Ground Transportation industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

BA vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

BA

2.36

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
8.07
Q3
4.49
Median
2.42
Q1
1.39
Min
0.00

BA’s P/S Ratio of 2.36 aligns with the market consensus for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

UBER

4.00

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
4.02
Q3
2.20
Median
1.23
Q1
0.87
Min
0.22

UBER’s P/S Ratio of 4.00 is in the upper echelon for the Ground Transportation industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

BA vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

BA

1,764.78

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
13.67
Q3
7.92
Median
4.65
Q1
2.68
Min
0.82

At 1,764.78, BA’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Aerospace & Defense industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

UBER

8.63

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
4.95
Q3
2.78
Median
1.38
Q1
1.17
Min
0.64

At 8.63, UBER’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Ground Transportation industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

BA vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolBAUBER
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--14.99
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.364.00
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1,764.788.63
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)32.1122.17