Seek Returns logo

BA vs. TSLA: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at BA and TSLA, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolBATSLA
Company NameThe Boeing CompanyTesla, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryAerospace & DefenseAutomobiles
Market Capitalization166.82 billion USD1,527.77 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateJanuary 2, 1962June 29, 2010
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of BA and TSLA by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

BA vs. TSLA: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolBATSLA
5-Day Price Return0.78%0.44%
13-Week Price Return2.58%40.00%
26-Week Price Return20.15%63.46%
52-Week Price Return41.54%70.74%
Month-to-Date Return-0.29%33.20%
Year-to-Date Return21.58%10.12%
10-Day Avg. Volume9.62M91.56M
3-Month Avg. Volume7.79M97.49M
3-Month Volatility24.31%46.51%
Beta1.192.06

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

BA

2,402.16%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
37.11%
Q3
20.14%
Median
11.72%
Q1
6.30%
Min
-6.24%

BA’s Return on Equity of 2,402.16% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

TSLA

8.22%

Automobiles Industry

Max
28.52%
Q3
12.70%
Median
5.15%
Q1
-1.62%
Min
-18.19%

TSLA’s Return on Equity of 8.22% is on par with the norm for the Automobiles industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

BA vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

BA

-14.18%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
13.66%
Q3
8.61%
Median
6.59%
Q1
4.92%
Min
1.01%

BA has a negative Net Profit Margin of -14.18%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

TSLA

6.54%

Automobiles Industry

Max
8.82%
Q3
5.80%
Median
2.77%
Q1
-1.08%
Min
-10.15%

A Net Profit Margin of 6.54% places TSLA in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

BA vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

BA

-12.27%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
22.35%
Q3
12.83%
Median
9.29%
Q1
6.38%
Min
-2.15%

BA has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -12.27%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

TSLA

6.06%

Automobiles Industry

Max
13.07%
Q3
6.94%
Median
4.50%
Q1
-2.17%
Min
-13.85%

TSLA’s Operating Profit Margin of 6.06% is around the midpoint for the Automobiles industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

BA vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolBATSLA
Return on Equity (TTM)2,402.16%8.22%
Return on Assets (TTM)-7.06%4.89%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-14.18%6.54%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-12.27%6.06%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)-0.32%17.48%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

BA

1.23

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
3.35
Q3
2.03
Median
1.24
Q1
1.04
Min
0.77

BA’s Current Ratio of 1.23 aligns with the median group of the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

TSLA

2.04

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.13
Q3
1.52
Median
1.29
Q1
1.09
Min
0.47

TSLA’s Current Ratio of 2.04 is in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

BA vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

BA

117.95

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
1.72
Q3
0.96
Median
0.63
Q1
0.37
Min
0.03

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 117.95, BA operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Aerospace & Defense industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

TSLA

0.09

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.07
Q3
1.17
Median
0.60
Q1
0.30
Min
0.05

Falling into the lower quartile for the Automobiles industry, TSLA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.09 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

BA vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

BA

-3.60

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
36.57
Q3
19.08
Median
7.25
Q1
2.65
Min
-7.63

BA has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -3.60. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

TSLA

71.48

Automobiles Industry

Max
77.87
Q3
37.26
Median
13.42
Q1
1.43
Min
-49.07

TSLA’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 71.48 is in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

BA vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolBATSLA
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.232.04
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.381.35
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)117.950.09
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-3.6071.48

Growth

Revenue Growth

BA vs. TSLA: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

BA vs. TSLA: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

BA

0.10%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
2.72%
Q3
1.45%
Median
0.48%
Q1
0.08%
Min
0.00%

BA’s Dividend Yield of 0.10% is consistent with its peers in the Aerospace & Defense industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

TSLA

0.00%

Automobiles Industry

Max
10.85%
Q3
4.84%
Median
2.53%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TSLA currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

BA vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

BA

0.00%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
110.40%
Q3
50.43%
Median
17.11%
Q1
0.46%
Min
0.00%

BA has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

TSLA

0.00%

Automobiles Industry

Max
131.16%
Q3
60.59%
Median
36.73%
Q1
5.97%
Min
0.00%

TSLA has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

BA vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolBATSLA
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.10%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

BA

--

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
67.20
Q3
55.74
Median
33.28
Q1
27.49
Min
15.02

P/E Ratio data for BA is currently unavailable.

TSLA

252.02

Automobiles Industry

Max
31.95
Q3
22.20
Median
11.17
Q1
7.39
Min
4.54

At 252.02, TSLA’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Automobiles industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

BA vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

BA

2.16

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
9.06
Q3
4.87
Median
2.47
Q1
1.61
Min
0.33

BA’s P/S Ratio of 2.16 aligns with the market consensus for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

TSLA

16.48

Automobiles Industry

Max
1.49
Q3
0.92
Median
0.47
Q1
0.24
Min
0.09

With a P/S Ratio of 16.48, TSLA trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Automobiles industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

BA vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

BA

1,764.78

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
14.90
Q3
8.93
Median
4.70
Q1
3.03
Min
0.83

At 1,764.78, BA’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Aerospace & Defense industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

TSLA

13.23

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.87
Q3
1.83
Median
0.79
Q1
0.47
Min
0.18

At 13.23, TSLA’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Automobiles industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

BA vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolBATSLA
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--252.02
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.1616.48
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1,764.7813.23
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)29.42273.50