Seek Returns logo

BA vs. POOL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at BA and POOL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolBAPOOL
Company NameThe Boeing CompanyPool Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryAerospace & DefenseDistributors
Market Capitalization166.82 billion USD11.54 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateJanuary 2, 1962October 13, 1995
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of BA and POOL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

BA vs. POOL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolBAPOOL
5-Day Price Return0.78%-0.21%
13-Week Price Return2.58%6.38%
26-Week Price Return20.15%-5.16%
52-Week Price Return41.54%-16.77%
Month-to-Date Return-0.29%-0.21%
Year-to-Date Return21.58%-9.05%
10-Day Avg. Volume9.62M0.63M
3-Month Avg. Volume7.79M0.58M
3-Month Volatility24.31%33.19%
Beta1.191.14

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

BA

2,402.16%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
37.11%
Q3
20.14%
Median
11.72%
Q1
6.30%
Min
-6.24%

BA’s Return on Equity of 2,402.16% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

POOL

31.34%

Distributors Industry

Max
35.43%
Q3
27.95%
Median
14.57%
Q1
11.23%
Min
11.19%

In the upper quartile for the Distributors industry, POOL’s Return on Equity of 31.34% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

BA vs. POOL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Distributors industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

BA

-14.18%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
13.66%
Q3
8.61%
Median
6.59%
Q1
4.92%
Min
1.01%

BA has a negative Net Profit Margin of -14.18%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

POOL

7.79%

Distributors Industry

Max
5.68%
Q3
5.68%
Median
5.36%
Q1
4.87%
Min
4.81%

POOL’s Net Profit Margin of 7.79% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Distributors industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

BA vs. POOL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Distributors industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

BA

-12.27%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
22.35%
Q3
12.83%
Median
9.29%
Q1
6.38%
Min
-2.15%

BA has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -12.27%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

POOL

11.13%

Distributors Industry

Max
11.13%
Q3
7.77%
Median
5.57%
Q1
5.27%
Min
4.95%

An Operating Profit Margin of 11.13% places POOL in the upper quartile for the Distributors industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

BA vs. POOL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Distributors industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolBAPOOL
Return on Equity (TTM)2,402.16%31.34%
Return on Assets (TTM)-7.06%11.64%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-14.18%7.79%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-12.27%11.13%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)-0.32%29.46%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

BA

1.23

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
3.35
Q3
2.03
Median
1.24
Q1
1.04
Min
0.77

BA’s Current Ratio of 1.23 aligns with the median group of the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

POOL

2.52

Distributors Industry

Max
1.81
Q3
1.66
Median
1.21
Q1
1.15
Min
1.09

POOL’s Current Ratio of 2.52 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Distributors industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

BA vs. POOL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Distributors industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

BA

117.95

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
1.72
Q3
0.96
Median
0.63
Q1
0.37
Min
0.03

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 117.95, BA operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Aerospace & Defense industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

POOL

0.95

Distributors Industry

Max
1.19
Q3
1.00
Median
0.81
Q1
0.52
Min
0.46

POOL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.95 is typical for the Distributors industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

BA vs. POOL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Distributors industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

BA

-3.60

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
36.57
Q3
19.08
Median
7.25
Q1
2.65
Min
-7.63

BA has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -3.60. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

POOL

12.28

Distributors Industry

Max
13.15
Q3
10.84
Median
5.59
Q1
4.01
Min
3.80

POOL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 12.28 is in the upper quartile for the Distributors industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

BA vs. POOL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Distributors industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolBAPOOL
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.232.52
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.380.82
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)117.950.95
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-3.6012.28

Growth

Revenue Growth

BA vs. POOL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

BA vs. POOL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

BA

0.10%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
2.72%
Q3
1.45%
Median
0.48%
Q1
0.08%
Min
0.00%

BA’s Dividend Yield of 0.10% is consistent with its peers in the Aerospace & Defense industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

POOL

1.58%

Distributors Industry

Max
48.14%
Q3
37.24%
Median
4.28%
Q1
3.20%
Min
1.61%

POOL’s Dividend Yield of 1.58% is below the typical range for the Distributors industry. This indicates that shareholder returns are likely driven more by potential capital appreciation than by dividend income.

BA vs. POOL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Distributors industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

BA

0.00%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
110.40%
Q3
50.43%
Median
17.11%
Q1
0.46%
Min
0.00%

BA has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

POOL

44.67%

Distributors Industry

Max
903.92%
Q3
695.25%
Median
56.97%
Q1
44.33%
Min
26.53%

POOL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 44.67% is within the typical range for the Distributors industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

BA vs. POOL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Distributors industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolBAPOOL
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.10%1.58%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%44.67%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

BA

--

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
67.20
Q3
55.74
Median
33.28
Q1
27.49
Min
15.02

P/E Ratio data for BA is currently unavailable.

POOL

28.32

Distributors Industry

Max
27.78
Q3
22.45
Median
18.78
Q1
12.95
Min
5.82

At 28.32, POOL’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Distributors industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

BA vs. POOL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Distributors industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

BA

2.16

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
9.06
Q3
4.87
Median
2.47
Q1
1.61
Min
0.33

BA’s P/S Ratio of 2.16 aligns with the market consensus for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

POOL

2.20

Distributors Industry

Max
1.07
Q3
1.07
Median
0.94
Q1
0.62
Min
0.28

With a P/S Ratio of 2.20, POOL trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Distributors industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

BA vs. POOL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Distributors industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

BA

1,764.78

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
14.90
Q3
8.93
Median
4.70
Q1
3.03
Min
0.83

At 1,764.78, BA’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Aerospace & Defense industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

POOL

8.44

Distributors Industry

Max
3.58
Q3
3.46
Median
3.12
Q1
2.75
Min
2.63

At 8.44, POOL’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Distributors industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

BA vs. POOL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Distributors industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolBAPOOL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--28.32
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.162.20
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1,764.788.44
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)29.4223.97