Seek Returns logo

BA vs. GWW: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at BA and GWW, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolBAGWW
Company NameThe Boeing CompanyW.W. Grainger, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryAerospace & DefenseTrading Companies & Distributors
Market Capitalization176.46 billion USD46.97 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJanuary 2, 1962February 21, 1973
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of BA and GWW by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

BA vs. GWW: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolBAGWW
5-Day Price Return2.66%4.20%
13-Week Price Return17.55%-8.00%
26-Week Price Return26.28%-6.05%
52-Week Price Return42.19%2.36%
Month-to-Date Return5.20%-5.53%
Year-to-Date Return31.85%-6.83%
10-Day Avg. Volume6.02M0.42M
3-Month Avg. Volume8.67M0.29M
3-Month Volatility27.11%27.65%
Beta1.511.19

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

BA

2,402.16%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
43.89%
Q3
22.42%
Median
12.50%
Q1
5.21%
Min
-6.24%

BA’s Return on Equity of 2,402.16% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

GWW

54.86%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
32.33%
Q3
19.92%
Median
14.05%
Q1
11.46%
Min
0.91%

GWW’s Return on Equity of 54.86% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

BA vs. GWW: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

BA

-14.18%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
14.54%
Q3
8.08%
Median
6.17%
Q1
2.49%
Min
-1.63%

BA has a negative Net Profit Margin of -14.18%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

GWW

10.99%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
17.73%
Q3
10.81%
Median
6.13%
Q1
4.33%
Min
2.09%

A Net Profit Margin of 10.99% places GWW in the upper quartile for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

BA vs. GWW: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

BA

-12.27%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
16.63%
Q3
10.38%
Median
8.29%
Q1
6.21%
Min
0.95%

BA has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -12.27%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

GWW

15.27%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
25.50%
Q3
15.13%
Median
7.46%
Q1
5.44%
Min
3.55%

An Operating Profit Margin of 15.27% places GWW in the upper quartile for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

BA vs. GWW: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolBAGWW
Return on Equity (TTM)2,402.16%54.86%
Return on Assets (TTM)-7.06%21.63%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-14.18%10.99%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-12.27%15.27%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)-0.32%39.25%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

BA

1.23

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
3.09
Q3
1.98
Median
1.23
Q1
1.03
Min
0.02

BA’s Current Ratio of 1.23 aligns with the median group of the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

GWW

2.82

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
2.82
Q3
2.13
Median
1.60
Q1
1.43
Min
0.46

GWW’s Current Ratio of 2.82 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

BA vs. GWW: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

BA

117.95

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
1.70
Q3
1.04
Median
0.68
Q1
0.41
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 117.95, BA operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Aerospace & Defense industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

GWW

0.64

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
1.88
Q3
1.18
Median
0.74
Q1
0.54
Min
0.00

GWW’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.64 is typical for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

BA vs. GWW: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

BA

-3.60

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
36.57
Q3
19.90
Median
7.04
Q1
2.40
Min
-7.63

BA has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -3.60. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

GWW

34.56

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
15.13
Q3
7.93
Median
5.75
Q1
2.70
Min
-1.67

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 34.56, GWW demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

BA vs. GWW: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolBAGWW
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.232.82
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.381.53
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)117.950.64
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-3.6034.56

Growth

Revenue Growth

BA vs. GWW: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

BA vs. GWW: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

BA

0.09%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
2.03%
Q3
1.22%
Median
0.43%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

BA’s Dividend Yield of 0.09% is consistent with its peers in the Aerospace & Defense industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

GWW

0.96%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
4.99%
Q3
3.04%
Median
1.94%
Q1
1.22%
Min
0.00%

GWW’s Dividend Yield of 0.96% is in the lower quartile for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

BA vs. GWW: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

BA

0.00%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
83.87%
Q3
49.90%
Median
16.48%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

BA has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

GWW

22.89%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
95.14%
Q3
62.08%
Median
51.17%
Q1
26.24%
Min
0.00%

GWW’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 22.89% is in the lower quartile for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

BA vs. GWW: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolBAGWW
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.09%0.96%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%22.89%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

BA

--

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
65.97
Q3
54.11
Median
34.53
Q1
23.66
Min
0.00

P/E Ratio data for BA is currently unavailable.

GWW

23.95

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
48.55
Q3
26.73
Median
17.17
Q1
10.78
Min
1.62

GWW’s P/E Ratio of 23.95 is within the middle range for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

BA vs. GWW: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

BA

2.36

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
8.07
Q3
4.49
Median
2.42
Q1
1.39
Min
0.00

BA’s P/S Ratio of 2.36 aligns with the market consensus for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

GWW

2.63

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
4.88
Q3
2.56
Median
1.02
Q1
0.60
Min
0.29

GWW’s P/S Ratio of 2.63 is in the upper echelon for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

BA vs. GWW: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

BA

1,764.78

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
13.67
Q3
7.92
Median
4.65
Q1
2.68
Min
0.82

At 1,764.78, BA’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Aerospace & Defense industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

GWW

13.60

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
8.77
Q3
4.33
Median
2.00
Q1
1.11
Min
0.35

At 13.60, GWW’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

BA vs. GWW: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolBAGWW
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--23.95
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.362.63
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1,764.7813.60
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)32.1132.51