Seek Returns logo

BA vs. GPN: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at BA and GPN, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolBAGPN
Company NameThe Boeing CompanyGlobal Payments Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsFinancials
GICS IndustryAerospace & DefenseFinancial Services
Market Capitalization176.46 billion USD20.98 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJanuary 2, 1962January 16, 2001
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of BA and GPN by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

BA vs. GPN: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolBAGPN
5-Day Price Return2.66%5.41%
13-Week Price Return17.55%3.99%
26-Week Price Return26.28%-22.21%
52-Week Price Return42.19%-13.91%
Month-to-Date Return5.20%8.14%
Year-to-Date Return31.85%-22.84%
10-Day Avg. Volume6.02M3.06M
3-Month Avg. Volume8.67M3.35M
3-Month Volatility27.11%38.30%
Beta1.511.00

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

BA

2,402.16%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
43.89%
Q3
22.42%
Median
12.50%
Q1
5.21%
Min
-6.24%

BA’s Return on Equity of 2,402.16% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

GPN

6.36%

Financial Services Industry

Max
40.58%
Q3
20.06%
Median
10.67%
Q1
4.19%
Min
-10.31%

GPN’s Return on Equity of 6.36% is on par with the norm for the Financial Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

BA vs. GPN: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

BA

-14.18%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
14.54%
Q3
8.08%
Median
6.17%
Q1
2.49%
Min
-1.63%

BA has a negative Net Profit Margin of -14.18%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

GPN

15.07%

Financial Services Industry

Max
52.86%
Q3
25.58%
Median
12.23%
Q1
6.64%
Min
-9.92%

GPN’s Net Profit Margin of 15.07% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Financial Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

BA vs. GPN: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

BA

-12.27%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
16.63%
Q3
10.38%
Median
8.29%
Q1
6.21%
Min
0.95%

BA has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -12.27%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

GPN

23.26%

Financial Services Industry

Max
77.28%
Q3
37.68%
Median
18.17%
Q1
9.27%
Min
-8.19%

GPN’s Operating Profit Margin of 23.26% is around the midpoint for the Financial Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

BA vs. GPN: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolBAGPN
Return on Equity (TTM)2,402.16%6.36%
Return on Assets (TTM)-7.06%2.96%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-14.18%15.07%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-12.27%23.26%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)-0.32%65.01%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

BA

1.23

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
3.09
Q3
1.98
Median
1.23
Q1
1.03
Min
0.02

BA’s Current Ratio of 1.23 aligns with the median group of the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

GPN

0.95

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.58
Q3
2.59
Median
1.33
Q1
0.69
Min
0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

BA vs. GPN: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

BA

117.95

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
1.70
Q3
1.04
Median
0.68
Q1
0.41
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 117.95, BA operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Aerospace & Defense industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

GPN

0.74

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.96
Q3
2.10
Median
0.57
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

BA vs. GPN: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

BA

-3.60

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
36.57
Q3
19.90
Median
7.04
Q1
2.40
Min
-7.63

BA has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -3.60. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

GPN

5.15

Financial Services Industry

Max
136.23
Q3
56.08
Median
6.55
Q1
2.01
Min
-33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

BA vs. GPN: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolBAGPN
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.230.95
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.380.90
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)117.950.74
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-3.605.15

Growth

Revenue Growth

BA vs. GPN: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

BA vs. GPN: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

BA

0.09%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
2.03%
Q3
1.22%
Median
0.43%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

BA’s Dividend Yield of 0.09% is consistent with its peers in the Aerospace & Defense industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

GPN

1.18%

Financial Services Industry

Max
8.18%
Q3
3.60%
Median
1.56%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GPN’s Dividend Yield of 1.18% is consistent with its peers in the Financial Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

BA vs. GPN: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

BA

0.00%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
83.87%
Q3
49.90%
Median
16.48%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

BA has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

GPN

17.30%

Financial Services Industry

Max
155.56%
Q3
63.71%
Median
18.08%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GPN’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 17.30% is within the typical range for the Financial Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

BA vs. GPN: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolBAGPN
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.09%1.18%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%17.30%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

BA

--

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
65.97
Q3
54.11
Median
34.53
Q1
23.66
Min
0.00

P/E Ratio data for BA is currently unavailable.

GPN

14.61

Financial Services Industry

Max
63.23
Q3
32.10
Median
14.41
Q1
10.81
Min
0.37

GPN’s P/E Ratio of 14.61 is within the middle range for the Financial Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

BA vs. GPN: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

BA

2.36

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
8.07
Q3
4.49
Median
2.42
Q1
1.39
Min
0.00

BA’s P/S Ratio of 2.36 aligns with the market consensus for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

GPN

2.20

Financial Services Industry

Max
11.16
Q3
5.45
Median
2.61
Q1
1.25
Min
0.04

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

BA vs. GPN: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

BA

1,764.78

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
13.67
Q3
7.92
Median
4.65
Q1
2.68
Min
0.82

At 1,764.78, BA’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Aerospace & Defense industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

GPN

0.86

Financial Services Industry

Max
7.09
Q3
3.79
Median
1.46
Q1
0.83
Min
0.04

GPN’s P/B Ratio of 0.86 is within the conventional range for the Financial Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

BA vs. GPN: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolBAGPN
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--14.61
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.362.20
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1,764.780.86
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)32.116.69