Seek Returns logo

BA vs. FTAI: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at BA and FTAI, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolBAFTAI
Company NameThe Boeing CompanyFTAI Aviation Ltd.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryAerospace & DefenseTrading Companies & Distributors
Market Capitalization166.82 billion USD17.76 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateJanuary 2, 1962May 14, 2015
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of BA and FTAI by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

BA vs. FTAI: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolBAFTAI
5-Day Price Return0.78%1.66%
13-Week Price Return2.58%52.04%
26-Week Price Return20.15%51.16%
52-Week Price Return41.54%30.26%
Month-to-Date Return-0.29%3.75%
Year-to-Date Return21.58%20.18%
10-Day Avg. Volume9.62M1.09M
3-Month Avg. Volume7.79M1.46M
3-Month Volatility24.31%63.29%
Beta1.191.57

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

BA

2,402.16%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
37.11%
Q3
20.14%
Median
11.72%
Q1
6.30%
Min
-6.24%

BA’s Return on Equity of 2,402.16% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

FTAI

464.64%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
32.99%
Q3
19.66%
Median
13.72%
Q1
9.74%
Min
-0.34%

FTAI’s Return on Equity of 464.64% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

BA vs. FTAI: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

BA

-14.18%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
13.66%
Q3
8.61%
Median
6.59%
Q1
4.92%
Min
1.01%

BA has a negative Net Profit Margin of -14.18%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

FTAI

21.31%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
16.11%
Q3
9.48%
Median
5.89%
Q1
3.68%
Min
-1.09%

FTAI’s Net Profit Margin of 21.31% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

BA vs. FTAI: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

BA

-12.27%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
22.35%
Q3
12.83%
Median
9.29%
Q1
6.38%
Min
-2.15%

BA has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -12.27%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

FTAI

26.26%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
26.26%
Q3
14.59%
Median
7.05%
Q1
4.94%
Min
-8.06%

An Operating Profit Margin of 26.26% places FTAI in the upper quartile for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

BA vs. FTAI: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolBAFTAI
Return on Equity (TTM)2,402.16%464.64%
Return on Assets (TTM)-7.06%11.31%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-14.18%21.31%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-12.27%26.26%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)-0.32%48.89%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

BA

1.23

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
3.35
Q3
2.03
Median
1.24
Q1
1.04
Min
0.77

BA’s Current Ratio of 1.23 aligns with the median group of the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

FTAI

5.01

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
3.32
Q3
2.27
Median
1.60
Q1
1.41
Min
0.26

FTAI’s Current Ratio of 5.01 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

BA vs. FTAI: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

BA

117.95

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
1.72
Q3
0.96
Median
0.63
Q1
0.37
Min
0.03

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 117.95, BA operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Aerospace & Defense industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

FTAI

20.88

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
1.93
Q3
1.24
Median
0.79
Q1
0.61
Min
0.01

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 20.88, FTAI operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Trading Companies & Distributors industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

BA vs. FTAI: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

BA

-3.60

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
36.57
Q3
19.08
Median
7.25
Q1
2.65
Min
-7.63

BA has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -3.60. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

FTAI

1.06

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
15.13
Q3
7.93
Median
5.67
Q1
2.04
Min
-1.67

In the lower quartile for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry, FTAI’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.06 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

BA vs. FTAI: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolBAFTAI
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.235.01
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.382.78
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)117.9520.88
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-3.601.06

Growth

Revenue Growth

BA vs. FTAI: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

BA vs. FTAI: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

BA

0.10%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
2.72%
Q3
1.45%
Median
0.48%
Q1
0.08%
Min
0.00%

BA’s Dividend Yield of 0.10% is consistent with its peers in the Aerospace & Defense industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

FTAI

0.84%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
5.25%
Q3
2.95%
Median
2.06%
Q1
1.11%
Min
0.00%

FTAI’s Dividend Yield of 0.84% is in the lower quartile for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

BA vs. FTAI: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

BA

0.00%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
110.40%
Q3
50.43%
Median
17.11%
Q1
0.46%
Min
0.00%

BA has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

FTAI

32.60%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
136.12%
Q3
71.34%
Median
47.49%
Q1
22.56%
Min
0.00%

FTAI’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 32.60% is within the typical range for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

BA vs. FTAI: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolBAFTAI
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.10%0.84%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%32.60%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

BA

--

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
67.20
Q3
55.74
Median
33.28
Q1
27.49
Min
15.02

P/E Ratio data for BA is currently unavailable.

FTAI

38.88

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
42.69
Q3
25.21
Median
16.99
Q1
13.13
Min
5.35

A P/E Ratio of 38.88 places FTAI in the upper quartile for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

BA vs. FTAI: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

BA

2.16

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
9.06
Q3
4.87
Median
2.47
Q1
1.61
Min
0.33

BA’s P/S Ratio of 2.16 aligns with the market consensus for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

FTAI

8.29

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
4.90
Q3
2.71
Median
1.06
Q1
0.70
Min
0.30

With a P/S Ratio of 8.29, FTAI trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

BA vs. FTAI: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

BA

1,764.78

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
14.90
Q3
8.93
Median
4.70
Q1
3.03
Min
0.83

At 1,764.78, BA’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Aerospace & Defense industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

FTAI

71.53

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
7.55
Q3
4.63
Median
2.09
Q1
1.30
Min
0.31

At 71.53, FTAI’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

BA vs. FTAI: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolBAFTAI
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--38.88
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.168.29
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1,764.7871.53
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)29.42--