BA vs. FLR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
Updated onHere’s a clear look at BA and FLR, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.
Company Profile
| Symbol | BA | FLR |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | The Boeing Company | Fluor Corporation |
| Country | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| GICS Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Construction & Engineering |
| Market Capitalization | 146.56 billion USD | 6.79 billion USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | January 2, 1962 | December 1, 2000 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Historical Performance
This chart compares the performance of BA and FLR by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Historical Performance at a Glance
| Symbol | BA | FLR |
|---|---|---|
| 5-Day Price Return | -0.15% | -7.02% |
| 13-Week Price Return | -17.32% | 1.22% |
| 26-Week Price Return | -4.38% | 9.34% |
| 52-Week Price Return | 38.97% | -15.78% |
| Month-to-Date Return | -3.23% | -13.08% |
| Year-to-Date Return | 9.90% | -14.05% |
| 10-Day Avg. Volume | 7.67M | 4.29M |
| 3-Month Avg. Volume | 7.57M | 4.07M |
| 3-Month Volatility | 27.71% | 40.80% |
| Beta | 1.19 | 1.37 |
Profitability
Return on Equity (TTM)
BA
2,402.16%
Aerospace & Defense Industry
- Max
- 43.89%
- Q3
- 23.64%
- Median
- 12.98%
- Q1
- 8.07%
- Min
- -2.55%
BA’s Return on Equity of 2,402.16% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.
FLR
105.11%
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 26.79%
- Q3
- 16.67%
- Median
- 11.05%
- Q1
- 8.46%
- Min
- -2.38%
FLR’s Return on Equity of 105.11% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.
Net Profit Margin (TTM)
BA
-12.20%
Aerospace & Defense Industry
- Max
- 14.96%
- Q3
- 9.50%
- Median
- 6.59%
- Q1
- 4.45%
- Min
- 1.01%
BA has a negative Net Profit Margin of -12.20%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.
FLR
25.35%
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 11.67%
- Q3
- 6.49%
- Median
- 3.88%
- Q1
- 2.38%
- Min
- -2.27%
FLR’s Net Profit Margin of 25.35% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)
BA
-10.24%
Aerospace & Defense Industry
- Max
- 17.97%
- Q3
- 12.09%
- Median
- 9.29%
- Q1
- 6.41%
- Min
- -1.59%
BA has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -10.24%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.
FLR
1.84%
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 17.78%
- Q3
- 9.70%
- Median
- 5.84%
- Q1
- 3.94%
- Min
- -1.78%
FLR’s Operating Profit Margin of 1.84% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.
Profitability at a Glance
| Symbol | BA | FLR |
|---|---|---|
| Return on Equity (TTM) | 2,402.16% | 105.11% |
| Return on Assets (TTM) | -6.38% | 45.38% |
| Net Profit Margin (TTM) | -12.20% | 25.35% |
| Operating Profit Margin (TTM) | -10.24% | 1.84% |
| Gross Profit Margin (TTM) | 1.10% | 3.02% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
BA
1.18
Aerospace & Defense Industry
- Max
- 3.37
- Q3
- 2.01
- Median
- 1.22
- Q1
- 1.07
- Min
- 0.68
BA’s Current Ratio of 1.18 aligns with the median group of the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.
FLR
1.62
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 2.26
- Q3
- 1.54
- Median
- 1.25
- Q1
- 0.99
- Min
- 0.65
FLR’s Current Ratio of 1.62 is in the upper quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)
BA
117.95
Aerospace & Defense Industry
- Max
- 1.89
- Q3
- 0.99
- Median
- 0.63
- Q1
- 0.39
- Min
- 0.03
With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 117.95, BA operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Aerospace & Defense industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.
FLR
0.18
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 2.54
- Q3
- 1.33
- Median
- 0.64
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
Falling into the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, FLR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.18 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)
BA
-3.60
Aerospace & Defense Industry
- Max
- 29.86
- Q3
- 19.49
- Median
- 7.09
- Q1
- 2.62
- Min
- -7.63
BA has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -3.60. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.
FLR
--
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 30.69
- Q3
- 15.27
- Median
- 7.88
- Q1
- 4.27
- Min
- -6.49
Interest Coverage Ratio data for FLR is currently unavailable.
Financial Strength at a Glance
| Symbol | BA | FLR |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.18 | 1.62 |
| Quick Ratio (MRQ) | 0.38 | 1.62 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) | 117.95 | 0.18 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -3.60 | -- |
Growth
Revenue Growth
EPS Growth
Dividend
Dividend Yield (TTM)
BA
0.17%
Aerospace & Defense Industry
- Max
- 2.87%
- Q3
- 1.46%
- Median
- 0.58%
- Q1
- 0.10%
- Min
- 0.00%
BA’s Dividend Yield of 0.17% is consistent with its peers in the Aerospace & Defense industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.
FLR
0.00%
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 5.80%
- Q3
- 3.25%
- Median
- 1.76%
- Q1
- 0.17%
- Min
- 0.00%
FLR currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
BA
0.00%
Aerospace & Defense Industry
- Max
- 110.40%
- Q3
- 51.46%
- Median
- 20.20%
- Q1
- 4.21%
- Min
- 0.00%
BA has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.
FLR
0.00%
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 144.77%
- Q3
- 74.39%
- Median
- 50.47%
- Q1
- 8.02%
- Min
- 0.00%
FLR has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.
Dividend at a Glance
| Symbol | BA | FLR |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.17% | 0.00% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Valuation
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)
BA
--
Aerospace & Defense Industry
- Max
- 94.22
- Q3
- 53.31
- Median
- 32.27
- Q1
- 24.64
- Min
- 14.57
P/E Ratio data for BA is currently unavailable.
FLR
1.65
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 39.16
- Q3
- 24.60
- Median
- 17.05
- Q1
- 13.85
- Min
- 1.65
In the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, FLR’s P/E Ratio of 1.65 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)
BA
1.83
Aerospace & Defense Industry
- Max
- 7.20
- Q3
- 3.95
- Median
- 2.35
- Q1
- 1.71
- Min
- 0.32
BA’s P/S Ratio of 1.83 aligns with the market consensus for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.
FLR
0.42
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 2.86
- Q3
- 1.52
- Median
- 0.80
- Q1
- 0.48
- Min
- 0.12
In the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, FLR’s P/S Ratio of 0.42 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)
BA
1,764.78
Aerospace & Defense Industry
- Max
- 18.61
- Q3
- 9.58
- Median
- 5.45
- Q1
- 3.11
- Min
- 0.94
At 1,764.78, BA’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Aerospace & Defense industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.
FLR
1.42
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 7.53
- Q3
- 3.97
- Median
- 1.90
- Q1
- 1.22
- Min
- 0.24
FLR’s P/B Ratio of 1.42 is within the conventional range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.
Valuation at a Glance
| Symbol | BA | FLR |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) | -- | 1.65 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) | 1.83 | 0.42 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) | 1,764.78 | 1.42 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM) | 621.23 | 7.23 |