Seek Returns logo

BA vs. CTAS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at BA and CTAS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolBACTAS
Company NameThe Boeing CompanyCintas Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryAerospace & DefenseCommercial Services & Supplies
Market Capitalization163.56 billion USD81.64 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateJanuary 2, 1962August 19, 1983
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of BA and CTAS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

BA vs. CTAS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolBACTAS
5-Day Price Return-0.36%-0.64%
13-Week Price Return0.18%-7.64%
26-Week Price Return26.83%-1.42%
52-Week Price Return41.47%-1.31%
Month-to-Date Return0.22%-1.29%
Year-to-Date Return22.20%10.90%
10-Day Avg. Volume9.42M2.12M
3-Month Avg. Volume7.83M1.68M
3-Month Volatility24.33%16.88%
Beta1.190.99

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

BA

2,402.16%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
37.11%
Q3
20.14%
Median
11.72%
Q1
6.30%
Min
-6.24%

BA’s Return on Equity of 2,402.16% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

CTAS

41.21%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
31.93%
Q3
16.86%
Median
10.28%
Q1
6.63%
Min
0.71%

CTAS’s Return on Equity of 41.21% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

BA vs. CTAS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

BA

-14.18%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
13.66%
Q3
8.61%
Median
6.59%
Q1
4.92%
Min
1.01%

BA has a negative Net Profit Margin of -14.18%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

CTAS

17.53%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
16.98%
Q3
9.05%
Median
5.35%
Q1
3.42%
Min
-2.31%

CTAS’s Net Profit Margin of 17.53% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

BA vs. CTAS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

BA

-12.27%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
22.35%
Q3
12.83%
Median
9.29%
Q1
6.38%
Min
-2.15%

BA has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -12.27%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

CTAS

22.82%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
23.33%
Q3
12.51%
Median
8.33%
Q1
4.45%
Min
-2.90%

An Operating Profit Margin of 22.82% places CTAS in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

BA vs. CTAS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolBACTAS
Return on Equity (TTM)2,402.16%41.21%
Return on Assets (TTM)-7.06%19.14%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-14.18%17.53%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-12.27%22.82%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)-0.32%50.04%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

BA

1.23

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
3.35
Q3
2.03
Median
1.24
Q1
1.04
Min
0.77

BA’s Current Ratio of 1.23 aligns with the median group of the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CTAS

2.09

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
3.73
Q3
2.13
Median
1.31
Q1
0.91
Min
0.59

CTAS’s Current Ratio of 2.09 aligns with the median group of the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

BA vs. CTAS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

BA

117.95

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
1.72
Q3
0.96
Median
0.63
Q1
0.37
Min
0.03

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 117.95, BA operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Aerospace & Defense industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

CTAS

0.52

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
2.24
Q3
1.14
Median
0.76
Q1
0.36
Min
0.00

CTAS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.52 is typical for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

BA vs. CTAS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

BA

-3.60

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
36.57
Q3
19.08
Median
7.25
Q1
2.65
Min
-7.63

BA has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -3.60. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

CTAS

24.70

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
24.70
Q3
13.44
Median
9.06
Q1
3.42
Min
-10.97

CTAS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 24.70 is in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

BA vs. CTAS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolBACTAS
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.232.09
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.381.71
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)117.950.52
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-3.6024.70

Growth

Revenue Growth

BA vs. CTAS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

BA vs. CTAS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

BA

0.10%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
2.72%
Q3
1.45%
Median
0.48%
Q1
0.08%
Min
0.00%

BA’s Dividend Yield of 0.10% is consistent with its peers in the Aerospace & Defense industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CTAS

0.75%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
3.65%
Q3
2.43%
Median
1.58%
Q1
0.74%
Min
0.00%

CTAS’s Dividend Yield of 0.75% is consistent with its peers in the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

BA vs. CTAS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

BA

0.00%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
110.40%
Q3
50.43%
Median
17.11%
Q1
0.46%
Min
0.00%

BA has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

CTAS

33.75%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
137.88%
Q3
73.07%
Median
44.79%
Q1
27.66%
Min
0.00%

CTAS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 33.75% is within the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

BA vs. CTAS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolBACTAS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.10%0.75%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%33.75%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

BA

--

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
67.20
Q3
55.74
Median
33.28
Q1
27.49
Min
15.02

P/E Ratio data for BA is currently unavailable.

CTAS

44.91

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
57.87
Q3
33.40
Median
23.56
Q1
15.28
Min
6.56

A P/E Ratio of 44.91 places CTAS in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

BA vs. CTAS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

BA

2.18

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
9.06
Q3
4.87
Median
2.47
Q1
1.61
Min
0.33

BA’s P/S Ratio of 2.18 aligns with the market consensus for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CTAS

7.87

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
4.84
Q3
2.58
Median
1.09
Q1
0.62
Min
0.06

With a P/S Ratio of 7.87, CTAS trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

BA vs. CTAS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

BA

1,764.78

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
14.90
Q3
8.93
Median
4.70
Q1
3.03
Min
0.83

At 1,764.78, BA’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Aerospace & Defense industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CTAS

19.50

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
6.40
Q3
3.97
Median
2.44
Q1
1.60
Min
0.40

At 19.50, CTAS’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

BA vs. CTAS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolBACTAS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--44.91
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.187.87
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1,764.7819.50
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)29.6846.32