B vs. SHW: Barrick Mining vs. Sherwin-Williams Stock Comparison

November 11, 2026

How do Barrick Mining (B) and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Barrick Mining (B) and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) both fall under the Materials industry group, but B is classified in Metals & Mining while SHW is classified in Chemicals.

Company profile comparison for Barrick Mining (B) and Sherwin-Williams (SHW)
Profile Item	B	SHW
Name	Barrick Mining Corporation	The Sherwin-Williams Company
Country/Region	Canada	United States
GICS Sector	Materials	Materials
GICS Industry Group	Materials	Materials
GICS Industry	Metals & Mining	Chemicals
GICS Sub-Industry	Gold	Specialty Chemicals
Market Capitalization	66.76 billion USD	83.13 billion USD
Currency	USD	USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	February 13, 1985	March 17, 1980
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

SHW

GSPC

Barrick Mining (B) vs. Sherwin-Williams (SHW), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…

Trailing total returns for Barrick Mining (B) and Sherwin-Williams (SHW). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…

Calendar-year total returns for Barrick Mining (B) and Sherwin-Williams (SHW). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Barrick Mining (B) and Sherwin-Williams (SHW)
Metric	B	SHW
Total Return (1Y)	30.63%	5.74%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)	43.54%	13.18%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)	19.79%	2.84%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

SHW

GSPC

Barrick Mining (B) vs. Sherwin-Williams (SHW), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…

Distribution of monthly total returns for Barrick Mining (B) and Sherwin-Williams (SHW). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Barrick Mining (B) and Sherwin-Williams (SHW)
Metric	B	SHW
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)	47.11%	29.59%
Beta (5Y)	0.48	1.02
Max Drawdown (5Y)	-47.62%	-42.46%
Avg. Volume (3M)	9.08M	1.72M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

B and SHW are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Barrick Mining (B) and Sherwin-Williams (SHW)
Metric	B	SHW
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)	0.56	0.05
Sortino Ratio (1Y)	0.80	0.08

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Both companies show strong equity returns, but Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 63.70% is the standout with ROE above its industry range; Barrick Mining (B) at 27.01% also sits in the top quartile.

B

Materials industry group

27.01%

Max: 52.88%
B: 27.01%
Q3: 19.49%
Median: 8.76%
Q1: -3.41%
Min: -32.81%

SHW

Materials industry group

63.70%

SHW: 63.70%
Max: 52.88%
Q3: 19.49%
Median: 8.76%
Q1: -3.41%
Min: -32.81%

Barrick Mining (B) vs. Sherwin-Williams (SHW): A comparison of their ROE against the Materials industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Barrick Mining (B) at 31.60% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 10.74%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

B

Materials industry group

31.60%

Max: 38.66%
B: 31.60%
Q3: 15.98%
Median: 5.28%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: -20.40%

SHW

Materials industry group

10.74%

Max: 38.66%
Q3: 15.98%
SHW: 10.74%
Median: 5.28%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: -20.40%

Barrick Mining (B) vs. Sherwin-Williams (SHW): A comparison of their net margin against the Materials industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Barrick Mining (B) at 51.34% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 17.56%, which runs around its industry’s norm.

B

Materials industry group

51.34%

Max: 66.70%
B: 51.34%
Q3: 28.92%
Median: 12.56%
Q1: 3.28%
Min: -14.07%

SHW

Materials industry group

17.56%

Max: 66.70%
Q3: 28.92%
SHW: 17.56%
Median: 12.56%
Q1: 3.28%
Min: -14.07%

Barrick Mining (B) vs. Sherwin-Williams (SHW): A comparison of their operating margin against the Materials industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Barrick Mining (B) and Sherwin-Williams (SHW)
Metric	B	SHW
ROE (TTM)	27.01%	63.70%
ROA (TTM)	13.44%	9.48%
Net Margin (TTM)	31.60%	10.74%
Operating Margin (TTM)	51.34%	17.56%
Gross Margin (TTM)	56.27%	48.60%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Both Barrick Mining (B) at 31.22% and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 2.06% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Barrick Mining (B) vs. Sherwin-Williams (SHW): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Barrick Mining (B) at 140.16% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at -2.75% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for B.

Barrick Mining (B) vs. Sherwin-Williams (SHW): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Barrick Mining (B) and Sherwin-Williams (SHW)
Metric	B	SHW
Revenue Growth (YoY)	31.22%	2.06%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)	15.47%	2.10%
EPS Growth (YoY)	140.16%	-2.75%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)	130.26%	9.95%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Barrick Mining (B) at 3.01 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 0.71 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for SHW.

B

Materials industry group

3.01

Max: 5.96
Q3: 3.30
B: 3.01
Median: 2.24
Q1: 1.45
Min: 0.16

SHW

Materials industry group

0.71

Max: 5.96
Q3: 3.30
Median: 2.24
Q1: 1.45
SHW: 0.71
Min: 0.16

Barrick Mining (B) vs. Sherwin-Williams (SHW): A comparison of their current ratio against the Materials industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Barrick Mining (B) at 0.13 keeps leverage in the lower quartile, while Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 3.72 is above its industry debt-to-equity ratio range.

B

Materials industry group

0.13

Max: 1.98
Q3: 0.89
Median: 0.47
Q1: 0.13
B: 0.13
Min: 0.00

SHW

Materials industry group

3.72

SHW: 3.72
Max: 1.98
Q3: 0.89
Median: 0.47
Q1: 0.13
Min: 0.00

Barrick Mining (B) vs. Sherwin-Williams (SHW): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Materials industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Barrick Mining (B) and Sherwin-Williams (SHW)
Metric	B	SHW
Current Ratio (MRQ)	3.01	0.71
Debt / Equity (MRQ)	0.13	3.72
Net Debt / EBITDA	-0.10	3.04

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Both Barrick Mining (B) at 1.61% and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 0.91% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.

B

Materials industry group

1.61%

Max: 4.52%
Q3: 1.85%
B: 1.61%
Median: 0.38%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

SHW

Materials industry group

0.91%

Max: 4.52%
Q3: 1.85%
SHW: 0.91%
Median: 0.38%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

Barrick Mining (B) vs. Sherwin-Williams (SHW): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Materials industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Both Barrick Mining (B) at 23.77% and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 29.35% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.

B

Materials industry group

23.77%

Max: 83.62%
Q3: 41.37%
B: 23.77%
Median: 9.54%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

SHW

Materials industry group

29.35%

Max: 83.62%
Q3: 41.37%
SHW: 29.35%
Median: 9.54%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

Barrick Mining (B) vs. Sherwin-Williams (SHW): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Materials industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Barrick Mining (B) and Sherwin-Williams (SHW)
Metric	B	SHW
Dividend Yield (TTM)	1.61%	0.91%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	23.77%	29.35%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Barrick Mining (B) at 10.48 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 31.66 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for B, though growth and earnings durability still matter.

B

Materials industry group

10.48

Max: 59.00
Q3: 32.93
Median: 18.82
Q1: 11.96
B: 10.48
Min: 3.93

SHW

Materials industry group

31.66

Max: 59.00
Q3: 32.93
SHW: 31.66
Median: 18.82
Q1: 11.96
Min: 3.93

Barrick Mining (B) vs. Sherwin-Williams (SHW): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Materials industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

On P/S ratio, both Barrick Mining (B) at 3.23 and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 3.34 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.

B

Materials industry group

3.23

Max: 9.62
Q3: 4.34
B: 3.23
Median: 1.87
Q1: 0.73
Min: 0.00

SHW

Materials industry group

3.34

Max: 9.62
Q3: 4.34
SHW: 3.34
Median: 1.87
Q1: 0.73
Min: 0.00

Barrick Mining (B) vs. Sherwin-Williams (SHW): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Materials industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Barrick Mining (B) at 2.44 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 20.78 prices above its benchmark range — SHW looks rich relative to book.

B

Materials industry group

2.44

Max: 6.59
Q3: 3.55
B: 2.44
Median: 2.08
Q1: 1.26
Min: -0.17

SHW

Materials industry group

20.78

SHW: 20.78
Max: 6.59
Q3: 3.55
Median: 2.08
Q1: 1.26
Min: -0.17

Barrick Mining (B) vs. Sherwin-Williams (SHW): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Materials industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Barrick Mining (B) and Sherwin-Williams (SHW)
Metric	B	SHW
P/E Ratio (TTM)	10.48	31.66
P/S Ratio (TTM)	3.23	3.34
P/B Ratio (MRQ)	2.44	20.78
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)	7.62%	2.98%