B vs. MLM: Barrick Mining vs. Martin Marietta Materials Stock Comparison
How do Barrick Mining (B) and Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Barrick Mining (B) and Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) both fall under the Materials industry group, but B is classified in Metals & Mining while MLM is classified in Construction Materials.
| Profile Item | B | MLM |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Barrick Mining Corporation | Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. |
| Country/Region | Canada | United States |
| GICS Sector | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry Group | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry | Metals & Mining | Construction Materials |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Gold | Construction Materials |
| Market Capitalization | 66.76 billion USD | 36.85 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | February 13, 1985 | February 17, 1994 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | B | MLM |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 30.63% | -12.23% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 43.54% | 6.32% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 19.79% | 5.43% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | B | MLM |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 47.11% | 29.72% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.48 | 1.02 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -47.62% | -33.19% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 9.08M | 805.11K |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | B | MLM |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.56 | -0.56 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 0.80 | -0.75 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Barrick Mining (B) at 27.01% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) at 6.02% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for B.
B
Materials industry group
27.01%
- Max
- 52.88%
- B
- 27.01%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- Median
- 8.76%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
MLM
Materials industry group
6.02%
- Max
- 52.88%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- Median
- 8.76%
- MLM
- 6.02%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
Net Margin (TTM)
For every dollar of sales, both Barrick Mining (B) at 31.60% and Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) at 31.88% retain more as net profit than most peers, landing in the top net margin quartile of their industries.
B
Materials industry group
31.60%
- Max
- 38.66%
- B
- 31.60%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- Median
- 5.28%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
MLM
Materials industry group
31.88%
- Max
- 38.66%
- MLM
- 31.88%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- Median
- 5.28%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Barrick Mining (B) at 51.34% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) at 22.29%, which runs around its industry’s norm.
B
Materials industry group
51.34%
- Max
- 66.70%
- B
- 51.34%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- Median
- 12.56%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
MLM
Materials industry group
22.29%
- Max
- 66.70%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- MLM
- 22.29%
- Median
- 12.56%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | B | MLM |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 27.01% | 6.02% |
| ROA (TTM) | 13.44% | 3.27% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 31.60% | 31.88% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 51.34% | 22.29% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 56.27% | 26.74% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both Barrick Mining (B) at 31.22% and Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) at 8.62% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EPS Growth
Barrick Mining (B) at 140.16% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) at -42.09% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for B.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | B | MLM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 31.22% | 8.62% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 15.47% | -0.06% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 140.16% | -42.09% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 130.26% | 10.61% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both Barrick Mining (B) at 3.01 and Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) at 1.63 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.
B
Materials industry group
3.01
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- B
- 3.01
- Median
- 2.24
- Q1
- 1.45
- Min
- 0.16
MLM
Materials industry group
1.63
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- Median
- 2.24
- MLM
- 1.63
- Q1
- 1.45
- Min
- 0.16
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Barrick Mining (B) at 0.13 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) at 0.75 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.
B
Materials industry group
0.13
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- Median
- 0.47
- Q1
- 0.13
- B
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
MLM
Materials industry group
0.75
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- MLM
- 0.75
- Median
- 0.47
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | B | MLM |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 3.01 | 1.63 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.13 | 0.75 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -0.10 | 5.88 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both Barrick Mining (B) at 1.61% and Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) at 0.63% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
B
Materials industry group
1.61%
- Max
- 4.52%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- B
- 1.61%
- Median
- 0.38%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
MLM
Materials industry group
0.63%
- Max
- 4.52%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- MLM
- 0.63%
- Median
- 0.38%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both Barrick Mining (B) at 23.77% and Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) at 24.85% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
B
Materials industry group
23.77%
- Max
- 83.62%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- B
- 23.77%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
MLM
Materials industry group
24.85%
- Max
- 83.62%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- MLM
- 24.85%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | B | MLM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.61% | 0.63% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 23.77% | 24.85% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Barrick Mining (B) at 10.48 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) at 38.67 sits in the richer quartile — a clear split in what investors pay for each dollar of trailing earnings.
B
Materials industry group
10.48
- Max
- 59.00
- Q3
- 32.93
- Median
- 18.82
- Q1
- 11.96
- B
- 10.48
- Min
- 3.93
MLM
Materials industry group
38.67
- Max
- 59.00
- MLM
- 38.67
- Q3
- 32.93
- Median
- 18.82
- Q1
- 11.96
- Min
- 3.93
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Barrick Mining (B) at 3.23 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) at 5.11 sits in the pricier quartile — MLM costs more per dollar of sales.
B
Materials industry group
3.23
- Max
- 9.62
- Q3
- 4.34
- B
- 3.23
- Median
- 1.87
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
MLM
Materials industry group
5.11
- Max
- 9.62
- MLM
- 5.11
- Q3
- 4.34
- Median
- 1.87
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
On P/B ratio, both Barrick Mining (B) at 2.44 and Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) at 2.09 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.
B
Materials industry group
2.44
- Max
- 6.59
- Q3
- 3.55
- B
- 2.44
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
MLM
Materials industry group
2.09
- Max
- 6.59
- Q3
- 3.55
- MLM
- 2.09
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | B | MLM |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 10.48 | 38.67 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 3.23 | 5.11 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 2.44 | 2.09 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 7.62% | 4.54% |