Seek Returns logo

AZZ vs. CTAS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AZZ and CTAS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolAZZCTAS
Company NameAZZ Inc.Cintas Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryBuilding ProductsCommercial Services & Supplies
Market Capitalization3.18 billion USD80.11 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980August 19, 1983
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AZZ and CTAS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AZZ vs. CTAS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolAZZCTAS
5-Day Price Return-2.90%-2.02%
13-Week Price Return4.96%-8.23%
26-Week Price Return30.84%-2.95%
52-Week Price Return29.07%-2.77%
Month-to-Date Return-2.92%-3.14%
Year-to-Date Return29.32%8.82%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.28M1.70M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.28M1.68M
3-Month Volatility26.78%16.66%
Beta1.160.98

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

AZZ

24.26%

Building Products Industry

Max
46.90%
Q3
27.60%
Median
15.43%
Q1
8.94%
Min
0.77%

AZZ’s Return on Equity of 24.26% is on par with the norm for the Building Products industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

CTAS

40.41%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
31.93%
Q3
16.86%
Median
10.28%
Q1
6.63%
Min
0.71%

CTAS’s Return on Equity of 40.41% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

AZZ vs. CTAS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

AZZ

16.40%

Building Products Industry

Max
19.42%
Q3
13.74%
Median
8.72%
Q1
4.81%
Min
0.46%

A Net Profit Margin of 16.40% places AZZ in the upper quartile for the Building Products industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

CTAS

17.54%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
16.98%
Q3
9.05%
Median
5.35%
Q1
3.42%
Min
-2.31%

CTAS’s Net Profit Margin of 17.54% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

AZZ vs. CTAS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

AZZ

14.89%

Building Products Industry

Max
26.72%
Q3
17.70%
Median
12.14%
Q1
9.54%
Min
1.65%

AZZ’s Operating Profit Margin of 14.89% is around the midpoint for the Building Products industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CTAS

22.89%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
23.33%
Q3
12.51%
Median
8.33%
Q1
4.45%
Min
-2.90%

An Operating Profit Margin of 22.89% places CTAS in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

AZZ vs. CTAS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAZZCTAS
Return on Equity (TTM)24.26%40.41%
Return on Assets (TTM)11.73%19.17%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)16.40%17.54%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)14.89%22.89%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)24.45%50.10%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

AZZ

1.51

Building Products Industry

Max
3.10
Q3
2.06
Median
1.60
Q1
1.30
Min
0.88

AZZ’s Current Ratio of 1.51 aligns with the median group of the Building Products industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CTAS

2.24

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
3.73
Q3
2.13
Median
1.31
Q1
0.91
Min
0.59

CTAS’s Current Ratio of 2.24 is in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

AZZ vs. CTAS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Building Products and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

AZZ

0.48

Building Products Industry

Max
1.64
Q3
1.02
Median
0.62
Q1
0.20
Min
0.00

AZZ’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.48 is typical for the Building Products industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CTAS

0.51

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
2.24
Q3
1.14
Median
0.76
Q1
0.36
Min
0.00

CTAS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.51 is typical for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

AZZ vs. CTAS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Building Products and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

AZZ

3.62

Building Products Industry

Max
72.12
Q3
34.39
Median
23.97
Q1
7.29
Min
2.97

In the lower quartile for the Building Products industry, AZZ’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.62 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

CTAS

24.70

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
24.70
Q3
13.44
Median
9.06
Q1
3.42
Min
-10.97

CTAS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 24.70 is in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

AZZ vs. CTAS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAZZCTAS
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.512.24
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.041.81
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.480.51
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)3.6224.70

Growth

Revenue Growth

AZZ vs. CTAS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

AZZ vs. CTAS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

AZZ

0.64%

Building Products Industry

Max
2.51%
Q3
1.92%
Median
1.30%
Q1
0.78%
Min
0.00%

AZZ’s Dividend Yield of 0.64% is in the lower quartile for the Building Products industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

CTAS

0.79%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
3.65%
Q3
2.43%
Median
1.58%
Q1
0.74%
Min
0.00%

CTAS’s Dividend Yield of 0.79% is consistent with its peers in the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

AZZ vs. CTAS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

AZZ

7.81%

Building Products Industry

Max
157.36%
Q3
76.90%
Median
30.70%
Q1
17.97%
Min
0.00%

AZZ’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 7.81% is in the lower quartile for the Building Products industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

CTAS

34.09%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
137.88%
Q3
73.07%
Median
44.79%
Q1
27.66%
Min
0.00%

CTAS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 34.09% is within the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

AZZ vs. CTAS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAZZCTAS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.64%0.79%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)7.81%34.09%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

AZZ

12.21

Building Products Industry

Max
45.60
Q3
30.36
Median
21.97
Q1
17.37
Min
12.44

AZZ’s P/E Ratio of 12.21 is below the typical range for the Building Products industry. This may indicate that the stock is potentially undervalued, or it could reflect market concerns about the company’s future prospects.

CTAS

43.16

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
57.87
Q3
33.40
Median
23.56
Q1
15.28
Min
6.56

A P/E Ratio of 43.16 places CTAS in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

AZZ vs. CTAS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

AZZ

2.00

Building Products Industry

Max
5.90
Q3
3.09
Median
1.72
Q1
1.07
Min
0.37

AZZ’s P/S Ratio of 2.00 aligns with the market consensus for the Building Products industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CTAS

7.57

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
4.84
Q3
2.58
Median
1.09
Q1
0.62
Min
0.06

With a P/S Ratio of 7.57, CTAS trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

AZZ vs. CTAS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

AZZ

2.30

Building Products Industry

Max
10.99
Q3
5.69
Median
2.98
Q1
1.80
Min
0.66

AZZ’s P/B Ratio of 2.30 is within the conventional range for the Building Products industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CTAS

17.80

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
6.40
Q3
3.97
Median
2.44
Q1
1.60
Min
0.40

At 17.80, CTAS’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

AZZ vs. CTAS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Building Products and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAZZCTAS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)12.2143.16
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.007.57
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.3017.80
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)8.2847.12