Seek Returns logo

AZO vs. VIPS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AZO and VIPS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

AZO’s market capitalization of 63.05 billion USD is substantially larger than VIPS’s 37.80 billion USD, indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.

With betas of 0.40 for AZO and 0.56 for VIPS, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.

VIPS is an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), allowing U.S. investors direct exposure to its non-U.S. operations. AZO, on the other hand, is a domestic entity.

SymbolAZOVIPS
Company NameAutoZone, Inc.Vipshop Holdings Limited
CountryUSCN
SectorConsumer CyclicalConsumer Cyclical
IndustrySpecialty RetailSpecialty Retail
CEOPhilip B. Daniele IIIYa Shen
Price3,769.26 USD14.99 USD
Market Cap63.05 billion USD37.80 billion USD
Beta0.400.56
ExchangeNYSENYSE
IPO DateApril 2, 1991March 23, 2012
ADRNoYes

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AZO and VIPS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AZO vs. VIPS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AZO

-57.43%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
70.52%
Q3
29.03%
Median
10.90%
Q1
-7.86%
Min
-57.43%

AZO has a negative Return on Equity of -57.43%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

VIPS

18.88%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
70.52%
Q3
29.03%
Median
10.90%
Q1
-7.86%
Min
-57.43%

VIPS’s Return on Equity of 18.88% is on par with the norm for the Specialty Retail industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

AZO vs. VIPS: A comparison of their ROE against the Specialty Retail industry benchmark.

Return on Invested Capital

AZO

15.20%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
29.46%
Q3
13.75%
Median
8.05%
Q1
0.80%
Min
-17.95%

In the upper quartile for the Specialty Retail industry, AZO’s Return on Invested Capital of 15.20% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

VIPS

13.41%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
29.46%
Q3
13.75%
Median
8.05%
Q1
0.80%
Min
-17.95%

VIPS’s Return on Invested Capital of 13.41% is in line with the norm for the Specialty Retail industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

AZO vs. VIPS: A comparison of their ROIC against the Specialty Retail industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin

AZO

13.56%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
19.78%
Q3
8.49%
Median
3.43%
Q1
-0.69%
Min
-9.88%

A Net Profit Margin of 13.56% places AZO in the upper quartile for the Specialty Retail industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

VIPS

6.88%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
19.78%
Q3
8.49%
Median
3.43%
Q1
-0.69%
Min
-9.88%

VIPS’s Net Profit Margin of 6.88% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Specialty Retail industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

AZO vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against the Specialty Retail industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin

AZO

19.63%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
24.47%
Q3
11.10%
Median
5.85%
Q1
0.66%
Min
-12.62%

An Operating Profit Margin of 19.63% places AZO in the upper quartile for the Specialty Retail industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

VIPS

8.12%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
24.47%
Q3
11.10%
Median
5.85%
Q1
0.66%
Min
-12.62%

VIPS’s Operating Profit Margin of 8.12% is around the midpoint for the Specialty Retail industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

AZO vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Operating Margin against the Specialty Retail industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAZOVIPS
Return on Equity (TTM)-57.43%18.88%
Return on Assets (TTM)13.77%9.88%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)15.20%13.41%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)13.56%6.88%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)19.63%8.12%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)52.95%23.36%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AZO

0.75

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
3.24
Q3
1.99
Median
1.42
Q1
1.02
Min
0.54

AZO’s Current Ratio of 0.75 falls into the lower quartile for the Specialty Retail industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

VIPS

1.28

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
3.24
Q3
1.99
Median
1.42
Q1
1.02
Min
0.54

VIPS’s Current Ratio of 1.28 aligns with the median group of the Specialty Retail industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

AZO vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Current Ratio against the Specialty Retail industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AZO

-2.99

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
2.72
Q3
1.42
Median
0.87
Q1
0.35
Min
0.01

AZO has a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of -2.99, which indicates negative shareholder equity where liabilities exceed assets. This is a critical sign of financial distress.

VIPS

0.13

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
2.72
Q3
1.42
Median
0.87
Q1
0.35
Min
0.01

Falling into the lower quartile for the Specialty Retail industry, VIPS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.13 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

AZO vs. VIPS: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against the Specialty Retail industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AZO

4.36

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
37.34
Q3
17.19
Median
4.28
Q1
0.11
Min
-23.60

AZO’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 4.36 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Specialty Retail industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

VIPS

151.50

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
37.34
Q3
17.19
Median
4.28
Q1
0.11
Min
-23.60

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 151.50, VIPS demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Specialty Retail industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

AZO vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against the Specialty Retail industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAZOVIPS
Current Ratio (TTM)0.751.28
Quick Ratio (TTM)0.031.14
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)-2.990.13
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.640.07
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)2.33-2.44
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)4.36151.50

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AZO and VIPS. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AZO vs. VIPS: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AZO vs. VIPS: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AZO vs. VIPS: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AZO

0.00%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
5.54%
Q3
1.52%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AZO currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

VIPS

3.20%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
5.54%
Q3
1.52%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 3.20%, VIPS offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Specialty Retail industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

AZO vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against the Specialty Retail industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AZO

0.00%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
177.64%
Q3
9.49%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AZO has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

VIPS

0.00%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
177.64%
Q3
9.49%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

VIPS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

AZO vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against the Specialty Retail industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAZOVIPS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%3.20%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AZO

24.62

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
81.45
Q3
42.51
Median
25.40
Q1
12.72
Min
1.88

AZO’s P/E Ratio of 24.62 is within the middle range for the Specialty Retail industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

VIPS

7.48

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
81.45
Q3
42.51
Median
25.40
Q1
12.72
Min
1.88

In the lower quartile for the Specialty Retail industry, VIPS’s P/E Ratio of 7.48 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

AZO vs. VIPS: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against the Specialty Retail industry benchmark.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AZO

2.12

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
5.90
Q3
2.79
Median
1.76
Q1
0.69
Min
0.00

AZO’s Forward PEG Ratio of 2.12 is within the middle range of its peers in the Specialty Retail industry. This suggests a reasonable balance between the stock’s price and its expected growth, aligning with sector valuation norms.

VIPS

-0.07

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
5.90
Q3
2.79
Median
1.76
Q1
0.69
Min
0.00

VIPS has a negative Forward PEG Ratio of -0.07. This typically results from negative earnings or forecasts of declining future earnings, making the ratio not meaningful for valuation.

AZO vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against the Specialty Retail industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AZO

3.34

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
5.26
Q3
2.60
Median
1.29
Q1
0.41
Min
0.06

AZO’s P/S Ratio of 3.34 is in the upper echelon for the Specialty Retail industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

VIPS

2.53

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
5.26
Q3
2.60
Median
1.29
Q1
0.41
Min
0.06

VIPS’s P/S Ratio of 2.53 aligns with the market consensus for the Specialty Retail industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

AZO vs. VIPS: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against the Specialty Retail industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AZO

-15.88

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
12.73
Q3
6.96
Median
3.28
Q1
1.42
Min
0.24

AZO has a negative P/B Ratio of -15.88, indicating its liabilities exceed its assets and result in negative shareholder equity. This is a critical warning sign of financial distress.

VIPS

1.37

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
12.73
Q3
6.96
Median
3.28
Q1
1.42
Min
0.24

VIPS’s P/B Ratio of 1.37 is in the lower quartile for the Specialty Retail industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

AZO vs. VIPS: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against the Specialty Retail industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAZOVIPS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)24.627.48
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)2.12-0.07
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)3.342.53
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)-15.881.37
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)31.49--
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)14.9925.99
EV-to-Sales (TTM)3.952.31