Seek Returns logo

AZO vs. VIK: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AZO and VIK, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

AZO’s market capitalization of 63.05 billion USD is substantially larger than VIK’s 24.58 billion USD, indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.

VIK carries a higher beta at 2.21, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while AZO (beta: 0.40) exhibits greater stability.

SymbolAZOVIK
Company NameAutoZone, Inc.Viking Holdings Ltd
CountryUSBM
SectorConsumer CyclicalConsumer Cyclical
IndustrySpecialty RetailTravel Services
CEOPhilip B. Daniele IIITorstein Hagen
Price3,769.26 USD55.46 USD
Market Cap63.05 billion USD24.58 billion USD
Beta0.402.21
ExchangeNYSENYSE
IPO DateApril 2, 1991June 14, 2010
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AZO and VIK by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AZO vs. VIK: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AZO

-57.43%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
70.52%
Q3
29.03%
Median
10.90%
Q1
-7.86%
Min
-57.43%

AZO has a negative Return on Equity of -57.43%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

VIK

-87.88%

Travel Services Industry

Max
73.02%
Q3
34.55%
Median
12.42%
Q1
-4.86%
Min
-43.74%

VIK has a negative Return on Equity of -87.88%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

AZO vs. VIK: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Specialty Retail and Travel Services industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AZO

15.20%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
29.46%
Q3
13.75%
Median
8.05%
Q1
0.80%
Min
-17.95%

In the upper quartile for the Specialty Retail industry, AZO’s Return on Invested Capital of 15.20% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

VIK

20.68%

Travel Services Industry

Max
20.68%
Q3
16.03%
Median
10.02%
Q1
6.13%
Min
3.60%

In the upper quartile for the Travel Services industry, VIK’s Return on Invested Capital of 20.68% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

AZO vs. VIK: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Specialty Retail and Travel Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AZO

13.56%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
19.78%
Q3
8.49%
Median
3.43%
Q1
-0.69%
Min
-9.88%

A Net Profit Margin of 13.56% places AZO in the upper quartile for the Specialty Retail industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

VIK

9.82%

Travel Services Industry

Max
30.84%
Q3
20.18%
Median
9.77%
Q1
7.81%
Min
-5.69%

VIK’s Net Profit Margin of 9.82% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Travel Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

AZO vs. VIK: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Specialty Retail and Travel Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AZO

19.63%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
24.47%
Q3
11.10%
Median
5.85%
Q1
0.66%
Min
-12.62%

An Operating Profit Margin of 19.63% places AZO in the upper quartile for the Specialty Retail industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

VIK

20.61%

Travel Services Industry

Max
32.49%
Q3
23.05%
Median
17.29%
Q1
11.44%
Min
3.62%

VIK’s Operating Profit Margin of 20.61% is around the midpoint for the Travel Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

AZO vs. VIK: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Specialty Retail and Travel Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAZOVIK
Return on Equity (TTM)-57.43%-87.88%
Return on Assets (TTM)13.77%5.06%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)15.20%20.68%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)13.56%9.82%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)19.63%20.61%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)52.95%40.77%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AZO

0.75

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
3.24
Q3
1.99
Median
1.42
Q1
1.02
Min
0.54

AZO’s Current Ratio of 0.75 falls into the lower quartile for the Specialty Retail industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

VIK

0.63

Travel Services Industry

Max
1.90
Q3
1.56
Median
1.16
Q1
0.68
Min
0.18

VIK’s Current Ratio of 0.63 falls into the lower quartile for the Travel Services industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

AZO vs. VIK: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Specialty Retail and Travel Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AZO

-2.99

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
2.72
Q3
1.42
Median
0.87
Q1
0.35
Min
0.01

AZO has a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of -2.99, which indicates negative shareholder equity where liabilities exceed assets. This is a critical sign of financial distress.

VIK

-20.41

Travel Services Industry

Max
2.53
Q3
2.25
Median
1.87
Q1
0.29
Min
0.20

VIK has a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of -20.41, which indicates negative shareholder equity where liabilities exceed assets. This is a critical sign of financial distress.

AZO vs. VIK: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Specialty Retail and Travel Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AZO

4.36

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
37.34
Q3
17.19
Median
4.28
Q1
0.11
Min
-23.60

AZO’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 4.36 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Specialty Retail industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

VIK

3.28

Travel Services Industry

Max
9.48
Q3
6.06
Median
3.05
Q1
2.58
Min
0.53

VIK’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.28 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Travel Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

AZO vs. VIK: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Specialty Retail and Travel Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAZOVIK
Current Ratio (TTM)0.750.63
Quick Ratio (TTM)0.030.61
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)-2.99-20.41
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.640.52
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)2.332.37
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)4.363.28

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AZO and VIK. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AZO vs. VIK: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AZO vs. VIK: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AZO vs. VIK: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AZO

0.00%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
5.54%
Q3
1.52%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AZO currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

VIK

0.00%

Travel Services Industry

Max
4.09%
Q3
0.54%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

VIK currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

AZO vs. VIK: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Specialty Retail and Travel Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AZO

0.00%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
177.64%
Q3
9.49%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AZO has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

VIK

3.66%

Travel Services Industry

Max
37.56%
Q3
4.41%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

VIK’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 3.66% is within the typical range for the Travel Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

AZO vs. VIK: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Specialty Retail and Travel Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAZOVIK
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%3.66%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AZO

24.62

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
81.45
Q3
42.51
Median
25.40
Q1
12.72
Min
1.88

AZO’s P/E Ratio of 24.62 is within the middle range for the Specialty Retail industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

VIK

45.40

Travel Services Industry

Max
43.15
Q3
34.01
Median
22.22
Q1
16.56
Min
9.02

At 45.40, VIK’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Travel Services industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

AZO vs. VIK: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Specialty Retail and Travel Services industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AZO

2.12

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
5.90
Q3
2.79
Median
1.76
Q1
0.69
Min
0.00

AZO’s Forward PEG Ratio of 2.12 is within the middle range of its peers in the Specialty Retail industry. This suggests a reasonable balance between the stock’s price and its expected growth, aligning with sector valuation norms.

VIK

2.15

Travel Services Industry

Max
2.37
Q3
1.61
Median
1.00
Q1
0.54
Min
0.02

A Forward PEG Ratio of 2.15 places VIK in the upper quartile for the Travel Services industry. This suggests the stock is potentially expensive compared to its peers relative to its growth forecast, which may warrant caution.

AZO vs. VIK: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Specialty Retail and Travel Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AZO

3.34

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
5.26
Q3
2.60
Median
1.29
Q1
0.41
Min
0.06

AZO’s P/S Ratio of 3.34 is in the upper echelon for the Specialty Retail industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

VIK

4.46

Travel Services Industry

Max
7.69
Q3
5.64
Median
2.87
Q1
0.93
Min
0.41

VIK’s P/S Ratio of 4.46 aligns with the market consensus for the Travel Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

AZO vs. VIK: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Specialty Retail and Travel Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AZO

-15.88

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
12.73
Q3
6.96
Median
3.28
Q1
1.42
Min
0.24

AZO has a negative P/B Ratio of -15.88, indicating its liabilities exceed its assets and result in negative shareholder equity. This is a critical warning sign of financial distress.

VIK

-90.57

Travel Services Industry

Max
10.52
Q3
10.49
Median
9.35
Q1
4.57
Min
1.91

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Travel Services industry.

AZO vs. VIK: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Specialty Retail and Travel Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAZOVIK
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)24.6245.40
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)2.122.15
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)3.344.46
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)-15.88-90.57
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)31.4920.59
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)14.9923.36
EV-to-Sales (TTM)3.954.96