Seek Returns logo

AZO vs. TCOM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AZO and TCOM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

AZO’s market capitalization of 63.05 billion USD is substantially larger than TCOM’s 38.39 billion USD, indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.

AZO’s beta of 0.40 points to significantly higher volatility compared to TCOM (beta: 0.09), suggesting AZO has greater potential for both gains and losses relative to market movements.

TCOM is an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), allowing U.S. investors direct exposure to its non-U.S. operations. AZO, on the other hand, is a domestic entity.

SymbolAZOTCOM
Company NameAutoZone, Inc.Trip.com Group Limited
CountryUSSG
SectorConsumer CyclicalConsumer Cyclical
IndustrySpecialty RetailTravel Services
CEOPhilip B. Daniele IIIJie Sun CPA
Price3,769.26 USD58.74 USD
Market Cap63.05 billion USD38.39 billion USD
Beta0.400.09
ExchangeNYSENASDAQ
IPO DateApril 2, 1991December 9, 2003
ADRNoYes

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AZO and TCOM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AZO vs. TCOM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AZO

-57.43%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
70.52%
Q3
29.03%
Median
10.90%
Q1
-7.86%
Min
-57.43%

AZO has a negative Return on Equity of -57.43%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

TCOM

12.21%

Travel Services Industry

Max
73.02%
Q3
34.55%
Median
12.42%
Q1
-4.86%
Min
-43.74%

TCOM’s Return on Equity of 12.21% is on par with the norm for the Travel Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

AZO vs. TCOM: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Specialty Retail and Travel Services industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AZO

15.20%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
29.46%
Q3
13.75%
Median
8.05%
Q1
0.80%
Min
-17.95%

In the upper quartile for the Specialty Retail industry, AZO’s Return on Invested Capital of 15.20% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

TCOM

6.40%

Travel Services Industry

Max
20.68%
Q3
16.03%
Median
10.02%
Q1
6.13%
Min
3.60%

TCOM’s Return on Invested Capital of 6.40% is in line with the norm for the Travel Services industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

AZO vs. TCOM: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Specialty Retail and Travel Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AZO

13.56%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
19.78%
Q3
8.49%
Median
3.43%
Q1
-0.69%
Min
-9.88%

A Net Profit Margin of 13.56% places AZO in the upper quartile for the Specialty Retail industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

TCOM

30.84%

Travel Services Industry

Max
30.84%
Q3
20.18%
Median
9.77%
Q1
7.81%
Min
-5.69%

A Net Profit Margin of 30.84% places TCOM in the upper quartile for the Travel Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

AZO vs. TCOM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Specialty Retail and Travel Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AZO

19.63%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
24.47%
Q3
11.10%
Median
5.85%
Q1
0.66%
Min
-12.62%

An Operating Profit Margin of 19.63% places AZO in the upper quartile for the Specialty Retail industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

TCOM

26.12%

Travel Services Industry

Max
32.49%
Q3
23.05%
Median
17.29%
Q1
11.44%
Min
3.62%

An Operating Profit Margin of 26.12% places TCOM in the upper quartile for the Travel Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

AZO vs. TCOM: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Specialty Retail and Travel Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAZOTCOM
Return on Equity (TTM)-57.43%12.21%
Return on Assets (TTM)13.77%6.87%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)15.20%6.40%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)13.56%30.84%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)19.63%26.12%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)52.95%81.06%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AZO

0.75

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
3.24
Q3
1.99
Median
1.42
Q1
1.02
Min
0.54

AZO’s Current Ratio of 0.75 falls into the lower quartile for the Specialty Retail industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

TCOM

1.46

Travel Services Industry

Max
1.90
Q3
1.56
Median
1.16
Q1
0.68
Min
0.18

TCOM’s Current Ratio of 1.46 aligns with the median group of the Travel Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

AZO vs. TCOM: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Specialty Retail and Travel Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AZO

-2.99

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
2.72
Q3
1.42
Median
0.87
Q1
0.35
Min
0.01

AZO has a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of -2.99, which indicates negative shareholder equity where liabilities exceed assets. This is a critical sign of financial distress.

TCOM

0.29

Travel Services Industry

Max
2.53
Q3
2.25
Median
1.87
Q1
0.29
Min
0.20

TCOM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.29 is typical for the Travel Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

AZO vs. TCOM: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Specialty Retail and Travel Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AZO

4.36

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
37.34
Q3
17.19
Median
4.28
Q1
0.11
Min
-23.60

AZO’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 4.36 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Specialty Retail industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

TCOM

9.48

Travel Services Industry

Max
9.48
Q3
6.06
Median
3.05
Q1
2.58
Min
0.53

TCOM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 9.48 is in the upper quartile for the Travel Services industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

AZO vs. TCOM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Specialty Retail and Travel Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAZOTCOM
Current Ratio (TTM)0.751.46
Quick Ratio (TTM)0.031.46
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)-2.990.29
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.640.17
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)2.33-0.70
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)4.369.48

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AZO and TCOM. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AZO vs. TCOM: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AZO vs. TCOM: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AZO vs. TCOM: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AZO

0.00%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
5.54%
Q3
1.52%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AZO currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

TCOM

0.50%

Travel Services Industry

Max
4.09%
Q3
0.54%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TCOM’s Dividend Yield of 0.50% is consistent with its peers in the Travel Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

AZO vs. TCOM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Specialty Retail and Travel Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AZO

0.00%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
177.64%
Q3
9.49%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AZO has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

TCOM

0.00%

Travel Services Industry

Max
37.56%
Q3
4.41%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TCOM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

AZO vs. TCOM: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Specialty Retail and Travel Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAZOTCOM
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.50%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AZO

24.62

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
81.45
Q3
42.51
Median
25.40
Q1
12.72
Min
1.88

AZO’s P/E Ratio of 24.62 is within the middle range for the Specialty Retail industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

TCOM

16.48

Travel Services Industry

Max
43.15
Q3
34.01
Median
22.22
Q1
16.56
Min
9.02

In the lower quartile for the Travel Services industry, TCOM’s P/E Ratio of 16.48 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

AZO vs. TCOM: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Specialty Retail and Travel Services industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AZO

2.12

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
5.90
Q3
2.79
Median
1.76
Q1
0.69
Min
0.00

AZO’s Forward PEG Ratio of 2.12 is within the middle range of its peers in the Specialty Retail industry. This suggests a reasonable balance between the stock’s price and its expected growth, aligning with sector valuation norms.

TCOM

1.00

Travel Services Industry

Max
2.37
Q3
1.61
Median
1.00
Q1
0.54
Min
0.02

TCOM’s Forward PEG Ratio of 1.00 is within the middle range of its peers in the Travel Services industry. This suggests a reasonable balance between the stock’s price and its expected growth, aligning with sector valuation norms.

AZO vs. TCOM: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Specialty Retail and Travel Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AZO

3.34

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
5.26
Q3
2.60
Median
1.29
Q1
0.41
Min
0.06

AZO’s P/S Ratio of 3.34 is in the upper echelon for the Specialty Retail industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

TCOM

5.03

Travel Services Industry

Max
7.69
Q3
5.64
Median
2.87
Q1
0.93
Min
0.41

TCOM’s P/S Ratio of 5.03 aligns with the market consensus for the Travel Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

AZO vs. TCOM: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Specialty Retail and Travel Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AZO

-15.88

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
12.73
Q3
6.96
Median
3.28
Q1
1.42
Min
0.24

AZO has a negative P/B Ratio of -15.88, indicating its liabilities exceed its assets and result in negative shareholder equity. This is a critical warning sign of financial distress.

TCOM

1.92

Travel Services Industry

Max
10.52
Q3
10.49
Median
9.35
Q1
4.57
Min
1.91

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Travel Services industry.

AZO vs. TCOM: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Specialty Retail and Travel Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAZOTCOM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)24.6216.48
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)2.121.00
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)3.345.03
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)-15.881.92
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)31.49--
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)14.9913.60
EV-to-Sales (TTM)3.954.78