AZO vs. ROST: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AZO and ROST, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
With AZO at 64.78 billion USD and ROST at 50.21 billion USD, their market capitalizations sit in the same ballpark.
ROST carries a higher beta at 1.18, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while AZO remains steadier at 0.44.
| Symbol | AZO | ROST |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | AutoZone, Inc. | Ross Stores, Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Consumer Cyclical | Consumer Cyclical |
| Industry | Specialty Retail | Apparel - Retail |
| CEO | Mr. Philip B. Daniele III | Mr. James G. Conroy |
| Price | 3,872.6 USD | 152.68 USD |
| Market Cap | 64.78 billion USD | 50.21 billion USD |
| Beta | 0.44 | 1.18 |
| Exchange | NYSE | NASDAQ |
| IPO Date | April 2, 1991 | August 8, 1985 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AZO and ROST over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of AZO and ROST based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- AZO has a negative P/B ratio of -14.98, indicating its liabilities exceed assets (negative equity). ROST, with a P/B of 8.62, maintains positive shareholder equity.
| Symbol | AZO | ROST |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 25.62 | 23.81 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 2.13 | 2.23 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 3.47 | 2.38 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | -14.98 | 8.62 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 32.17 | 30.67 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 18.37 | 16.35 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 4.12 | 2.42 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 38.16 | 31.25 |
Dividend Comparison
AZO offers a 0% dividend yield, suggesting it may be reinvesting available cash back into the business for future growth, while ROST provides a 0.99% dividend yield, giving investors a steady income stream.
| Symbol | AZO | ROST |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.99% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AZO and ROST, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- AZO’s current ratio of 0.84 signals a possible liquidity squeeze, while ROST at 1.62 comfortably covers its short-term obligations.
- AZO’s quick ratio of 0.13 suggests it may struggle to cover immediate liabilities without selling inventory or raising cash, whereas ROST at 1.09 maintains a comfortable buffer of liquid assets.
- AZO has negative equity (debt-to-equity ratio -2.77), an unusual warning sign, while ROST at 0.98 maintains a conventional debt-to-equity balance.
| Symbol | AZO | ROST |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 0.84 | 1.62 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.13 | 1.09 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | -2.77 | 0.98 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.68 | 0.38 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 7.90 | 53.88 |