AZO vs. NCLH: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AZO and NCLH, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
AZO dominates in value with a market cap of 64.78 billion USD, eclipsing NCLH’s 7.69 billion USD by roughly 8.42×.
NCLH carries a higher beta at 2.10, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while AZO remains steadier at 0.44.
| Symbol | AZO | NCLH |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | AutoZone, Inc. | Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Consumer Cyclical | Consumer Cyclical |
| Industry | Specialty Retail | Travel Services |
| CEO | Mr. Philip B. Daniele III | Mr. Harry J. Sommer |
| Price | 3,872.6 USD | 17.22 USD |
| Market Cap | 64.78 billion USD | 7.69 billion USD |
| Beta | 0.44 | 2.10 |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| IPO Date | April 2, 1991 | January 18, 2013 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AZO and NCLH over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of AZO and NCLH based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- AZO has a negative P/B ratio of -14.98, indicating its liabilities exceed assets (negative equity). NCLH, with a P/B of 5.36, maintains positive shareholder equity.
- NCLH reports a negative Price-to-Free Cash Flow ratio of -13.85, showing a cash flow shortfall that could threaten its operational sustainability, while AZO at 32.17 maintains positive cash flow.
| Symbol | AZO | NCLH |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 25.62 | 8.91 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 2.13 | 0.48 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 3.47 | 0.82 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | -14.98 | 5.36 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 32.17 | -13.85 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 18.37 | 10.95 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 4.12 | 2.28 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 38.16 | -38.71 |
Dividend Comparison
Neither AZO nor NCLH currently pays a dividend yield; this often indicates they are reinvesting earnings for growth, prioritizing long-term expansion over immediate cash returns to shareholders.
| Symbol | AZO | NCLH |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AZO and NCLH, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- With current ratios of 0.84 and 0.19, both AZO and NCLH have less current assets than short-term liabilities, which could strain their working capital and force reliance on additional financing.
- Both AZO (quick ratio 0.13) and NCLH (quick ratio 0.16) fall below 0.8, meaning their most liquid assets—excluding inventory—aren’t enough to meet short-term obligations. This could force them to rely on receivables, inventory turn, or external financing.
- AZO shows negative equity (debt-to-equity ratio -2.77), while NCLH is heavily leveraged (9.88), illustrating two different balance-sheet risks.
| Symbol | AZO | NCLH |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 0.84 | 0.19 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.13 | 0.16 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | -2.77 | 9.88 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.68 | 0.66 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 7.90 | 2.76 |