AZO vs. HLT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AZO and HLT, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
With AZO at 64.78 billion USD and HLT at 58.65 billion USD, their market capitalizations sit in the same ballpark.
HLT carries a higher beta at 1.23, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while AZO remains steadier at 0.44.
| Symbol | AZO | HLT |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | AutoZone, Inc. | Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Consumer Cyclical | Consumer Cyclical |
| Industry | Specialty Retail | Travel Lodging |
| CEO | Mr. Philip B. Daniele III | Mr. Christopher J. Nassetta |
| Price | 3,872.6 USD | 246.76 USD |
| Market Cap | 64.78 billion USD | 58.65 billion USD |
| Beta | 0.44 | 1.23 |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| IPO Date | April 2, 1991 | December 12, 2013 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AZO and HLT over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of AZO and HLT based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- Book value is underwater for both AZO (-14.98) and HLT (-13.70), meaning liabilities exceed assets—signaling a critical solvency risk for both companies.
| Symbol | AZO | HLT |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 25.62 | 38.19 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 2.13 | 1.91 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 3.47 | 5.19 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | -14.98 | -13.70 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 32.17 | 30.63 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 18.37 | 27.59 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 4.12 | 6.18 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 38.16 | 36.45 |
Dividend Comparison
AZO offers a 0% dividend yield, suggesting it may be reinvesting available cash back into the business for future growth, while HLT provides a 0.18% dividend yield, giving investors a steady income stream.
| Symbol | AZO | HLT |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.18% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AZO and HLT, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- With current ratios of 0.84 and 0.00, both AZO and HLT have less current assets than short-term liabilities, which could strain their working capital and force reliance on additional financing.
- Both AZO (quick ratio 0.13) and HLT (quick ratio 0.00) fall below 0.8, meaning their most liquid assets—excluding inventory—aren’t enough to meet short-term obligations. This could force them to rely on receivables, inventory turn, or external financing.
- Both AZO (debt-to-equity ratio -2.77) and HLT (-2.71) exhibit negative shareholder equity—assets fall short of liabilities—signaling serious balance-sheet stress.
| Symbol | AZO | HLT |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 0.84 | 0.00 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.13 | 0.00 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | -2.77 | -2.71 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.68 | 0.74 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 7.90 | 5.42 |