Seek Returns logo

AZO vs. CART: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated

Here’s a clear look at AZO and CART, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength.

Company Overview

AZO’s market capitalization of 62.38 billion USD is substantially larger than CART’s 12.05 billion USD, indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.

CART carries a higher beta at 1.31, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while AZO (beta: 0.40) exhibits greater stability.

SymbolAZOCART
Company NameAutoZone, Inc.Instacart (Maplebear Inc.)
CountryUSUS
SectorConsumer CyclicalConsumer Cyclical
IndustrySpecialty RetailSpecialty Retail
CEOMr. Philip B. Daniele IIIMs. Fidji Simo
Price3,728.85 USD46.2 USD
Market Cap62.38 billion USD12.05 billion USD
Beta0.401.31
ExchangeNYSENASDAQ
IPO DateApril 2, 1991September 19, 2023
ADRNoNo

Performance Comparison

This chart compares the performance of AZO and CART over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

Valuation Metrics Comparison

This section compares the market valuation of AZO and CART. Key takeaways regarding their valuation, when viewed within their industry context, are presented in the commentary that follows.

  • AZO’s Price-to-Book (P/B) ratio of -14.43 reflects a negative book value (meaning negative shareholder equity). This is a significant indicator of financial distress and raises substantial concerns about its solvency.
SymbolAZOCART
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)24.6728.00
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)2.132.17
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)3.343.49
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)-14.433.82
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)17.8019.22
EV-to-Sales (TTM)3.993.00

Dividend Comparison

Neither AZO nor CART currently pays a dividend; this often suggests they are reinvesting earnings for growth, prioritizing long-term expansion over immediate cash returns to shareholders.

SymbolAZOCART
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Financial Strength Metrics Comparison

This section evaluates the financial strength of AZO and CART. Noteworthy observations on their financial resilience, considered from an industry perspective, are detailed in the points that follow.

  • AZO’s current ratio of 0.84 is considered low. This may signal potential challenges with its short-term liquidity, implying that its current assets might offer a limited buffer for meeting its immediate debts and could affect its capacity to smoothly manage upcoming financial duties.
  • AZO’s quick ratio of 0.13 is low. This suggests potential difficulty in meeting its immediate financial responsibilities with its most liquid assets (excluding inventory), possibly indicating a greater dependence on inventory turnover to service short-term debts.
  • AZO’s Debt-to-Equity (D/E) ratio of -2.77 indicates negative shareholder equity. This is a significant red flag, suggesting its liabilities exceed its assets and posing a considerable threat to its long-term financial health.
SymbolAZOCART
Current Ratio (TTM)0.843.24
Quick Ratio (TTM)0.133.24
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)-2.770.01
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.680.01
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)2.88-3.09
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)7.90--