Seek Returns logo

AZN vs. REGN: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated

Here’s a clear look at AZN and REGN, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.

Company Overview

AZN dominates in value with a market cap of 432.07 billion USD, eclipsing REGN’s 64.18 billion USD by roughly 6.73×.

REGN carries a higher beta at 0.43, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while AZN remains steadier at 0.18.

AZN trades as an ADR, giving U.S. investors a simple on-ramp to its foreign shares, while REGN remains a standard domestic listing.

SymbolAZNREGN
Company NameAstraZeneca PLCRegeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
CountryGBUS
SectorHealthcareHealthcare
IndustryDrug Manufacturers - GeneralBiotechnology
CEOMr. Pascal Claude Roland Soriot D.V.M., M.B.A.Dr. Leonard S. Schleifer M.D., Ph.D.
Price69.68 USD604.62 USD
Market Cap432.07 billion USD64.18 billion USD
Beta0.180.43
ExchangeNASDAQNASDAQ
IPO DateMay 12, 1993April 2, 1991
ADRYesNo

Performance Comparison

This chart compares the performance of AZN and REGN over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).

Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

Valuation Metrics Comparison

For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between AZN and REGN, please refer to the table below.

SymbolAZNREGN
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)27.8014.34
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)2.501.09
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)3.934.56
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)5.262.20
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)22.3321.25
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)13.6812.81
EV-to-Sales (TTM)4.414.53
EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM)25.0721.12

Dividend Comparison

AZN’s dividend yield of 1.39% is about 377% higher than REGN’s 0.29%, underscoring its stronger focus on returning cash to shareholders.

SymbolAZNREGN
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.39%0.29%

Financial Strength Metrics Comparison

This section dives into the financial resilience of AZN and REGN, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.

  • AZN’s current ratio of 0.90 signals a possible liquidity squeeze, while REGN at 4.93 comfortably covers its short-term obligations.
  • AZN’s quick ratio of 0.70 suggests it may struggle to cover immediate liabilities without selling inventory or raising cash, whereas REGN at 4.03 maintains a comfortable buffer of liquid assets.
SymbolAZNREGN
Current Ratio (TTM)0.904.93
Quick Ratio (TTM)0.704.03
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.770.09
Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM)0.300.07
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)7.9598.59