Seek Returns logo

AZN vs. MDT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated

Here’s a clear look at AZN and MDT, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.

Company Overview

AZN dominates in value with a market cap of 432.07 billion USD, eclipsing MDT’s 108.26 billion USD by roughly 3.99×.

MDT carries a higher beta at 0.83, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while AZN remains steadier at 0.18.

AZN trades as an ADR, giving U.S. investors a simple on-ramp to its foreign shares, while MDT remains a standard domestic listing.

SymbolAZNMDT
Company NameAstraZeneca PLCMedtronic plc
CountryGBIE
SectorHealthcareHealthcare
IndustryDrug Manufacturers - GeneralMedical - Devices
CEOMr. Pascal Claude Roland Soriot D.V.M., M.B.A.Mr. Geoffrey Straub Martha
Price69.68 USD84.41 USD
Market Cap432.07 billion USD108.26 billion USD
Beta0.180.83
ExchangeNASDAQNYSE
IPO DateMay 12, 1993May 2, 1973
ADRYesNo

Performance Comparison

This chart compares the performance of AZN and MDT over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).

Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

Valuation Metrics Comparison

For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between AZN and MDT, please refer to the table below.

SymbolAZNMDT
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)27.8025.41
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)2.503.27
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)3.933.26
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)5.262.19
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)22.3319.80
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)13.6814.23
EV-to-Sales (TTM)4.414.03
EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM)25.0724.44

Dividend Comparison

MDT stands out with a 3.32% dividend yield—around 139% above AZN’s 1.39%—highlighting its emphasis on generous payouts.

SymbolAZNMDT
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.39%3.32%

Financial Strength Metrics Comparison

This section dives into the financial resilience of AZN and MDT, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.

  • AZN’s current ratio of 0.90 signals a possible liquidity squeeze, while MDT at 1.90 comfortably covers its short-term obligations.
  • AZN’s quick ratio of 0.70 suggests it may struggle to cover immediate liabilities without selling inventory or raising cash, whereas MDT at 1.43 maintains a comfortable buffer of liquid assets.
SymbolAZNMDT
Current Ratio (TTM)0.901.90
Quick Ratio (TTM)0.701.43
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.770.54
Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM)0.300.30
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)7.957.99