Seek Returns logo

AZN vs. LIN: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AZN and LIN, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

AZN trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, LIN is a standard domestic listing.

SymbolAZNLIN
Company NameAstraZeneca PLCLinde plc
CountryUnited KingdomUnited Kingdom
GICS SectorHealth CareMaterials
GICS IndustryPharmaceuticalsChemicals
Market Capitalization248.57 billion USD226.35 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateMay 12, 1993June 17, 1992
Security TypeADRCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AZN and LIN by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AZN vs. LIN: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolAZNLIN
5-Day Price Return0.76%0.42%
13-Week Price Return13.24%3.15%
26-Week Price Return2.43%5.40%
52-Week Price Return-10.56%3.04%
Month-to-Date Return4.84%4.88%
Year-to-Date Return13.41%15.30%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.15M1.55M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.48M1.73M
3-Month Volatility22.35%12.82%
Beta1.010.96

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

AZN

19.84%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
38.59%
Q3
19.84%
Median
11.90%
Q1
5.63%
Min
-9.96%

AZN’s Return on Equity of 19.84% is on par with the norm for the Pharmaceuticals industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

LIN

17.46%

Chemicals Industry

Max
26.17%
Q3
13.48%
Median
8.13%
Q1
2.52%
Min
-11.86%

In the upper quartile for the Chemicals industry, LIN’s Return on Equity of 17.46% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

AZN vs. LIN: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

AZN

14.68%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
34.51%
Q3
17.73%
Median
12.12%
Q1
5.99%
Min
-7.73%

AZN’s Net Profit Margin of 14.68% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Pharmaceuticals industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

LIN

20.20%

Chemicals Industry

Max
21.80%
Q3
9.57%
Median
4.44%
Q1
1.14%
Min
-11.30%

A Net Profit Margin of 20.20% places LIN in the upper quartile for the Chemicals industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

AZN vs. LIN: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

AZN

20.04%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
41.53%
Q3
23.00%
Median
16.24%
Q1
9.24%
Min
-6.94%

AZN’s Operating Profit Margin of 20.04% is around the midpoint for the Pharmaceuticals industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

LIN

26.75%

Chemicals Industry

Max
27.33%
Q3
13.97%
Median
8.08%
Q1
4.46%
Min
-8.10%

An Operating Profit Margin of 26.75% places LIN in the upper quartile for the Chemicals industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

AZN vs. LIN: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAZNLIN
Return on Equity (TTM)19.84%17.46%
Return on Assets (TTM)7.76%8.10%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)14.68%20.20%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)20.04%26.75%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)82.07%48.45%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

AZN

0.86

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
4.49
Q3
2.77
Median
1.74
Q1
1.26
Min
0.11

AZN’s Current Ratio of 0.86 falls into the lower quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

LIN

0.93

Chemicals Industry

Max
3.38
Q3
2.23
Median
1.73
Q1
1.39
Min
0.55

LIN’s Current Ratio of 0.93 falls into the lower quartile for the Chemicals industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

AZN vs. LIN: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

AZN

0.73

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
2.44
Q3
1.07
Median
0.42
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

AZN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.73 is typical for the Pharmaceuticals industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

LIN

0.67

Chemicals Industry

Max
1.65
Q3
0.94
Median
0.65
Q1
0.41
Min
0.00

LIN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.67 is typical for the Chemicals industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

AZN vs. LIN: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

AZN

9.51

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
103.95
Q3
44.18
Median
9.83
Q1
2.82
Min
-42.71

AZN’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 9.51 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Pharmaceuticals industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

LIN

33.09

Chemicals Industry

Max
56.43
Q3
26.33
Median
9.38
Q1
3.10
Min
-9.39

LIN’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 33.09 is in the upper quartile for the Chemicals industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

AZN vs. LIN: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAZNLIN
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.860.93
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.670.70
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.730.67
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)9.5133.09

Growth

Revenue Growth

AZN vs. LIN: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

AZN vs. LIN: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

AZN

2.00%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
6.98%
Q3
3.32%
Median
2.13%
Q1
0.14%
Min
0.00%

AZN’s Dividend Yield of 2.00% is consistent with its peers in the Pharmaceuticals industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

LIN

1.21%

Chemicals Industry

Max
6.56%
Q3
4.04%
Median
2.47%
Q1
1.45%
Min
0.00%

LIN’s Dividend Yield of 1.21% is in the lower quartile for the Chemicals industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

AZN vs. LIN: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

AZN

59.51%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
165.20%
Q3
90.59%
Median
49.13%
Q1
28.91%
Min
0.00%

AZN’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 59.51% is within the typical range for the Pharmaceuticals industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

LIN

40.71%

Chemicals Industry

Max
181.25%
Q3
95.01%
Median
53.52%
Q1
26.59%
Min
0.00%

LIN’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 40.71% is within the typical range for the Chemicals industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

AZN vs. LIN: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAZNLIN
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.00%1.21%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)59.51%40.71%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

AZN

29.72

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
42.51
Q3
26.88
Median
19.11
Q1
15.12
Min
0.00

A P/E Ratio of 29.72 places AZN in the upper quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

LIN

33.69

Chemicals Industry

Max
42.94
Q3
29.77
Median
20.37
Q1
14.27
Min
6.19

A P/E Ratio of 33.69 places LIN in the upper quartile for the Chemicals industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

AZN vs. LIN: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

AZN

4.36

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
7.55
Q3
4.54
Median
2.11
Q1
1.52
Min
0.00

AZN’s P/S Ratio of 4.36 aligns with the market consensus for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

LIN

6.80

Chemicals Industry

Max
4.36
Q3
2.23
Median
1.01
Q1
0.55
Min
0.16

With a P/S Ratio of 6.80, LIN trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Chemicals industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

AZN vs. LIN: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

AZN

4.74

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
9.78
Q3
4.96
Median
2.23
Q1
1.46
Min
0.60

AZN’s P/B Ratio of 4.74 is within the conventional range for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

LIN

5.73

Chemicals Industry

Max
4.92
Q3
2.56
Median
1.54
Q1
0.97
Min
0.30

At 5.73, LIN’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Chemicals industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

AZN vs. LIN: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAZNLIN
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)29.7233.69
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.366.80
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.745.73
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)30.1344.62