Seek Returns logo

AZN vs. IBM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AZN and IBM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

AZN trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, IBM is a standard domestic listing.

SymbolAZNIBM
Company NameAstraZeneca PLCInternational Business Machines Corporation
CountryUnited KingdomUnited States
GICS SectorHealth CareInformation Technology
GICS IndustryPharmaceuticalsIT Services
Market Capitalization249.69 billion USD225.94 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateMay 12, 1993January 2, 1962
Security TypeADRCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AZN and IBM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AZN vs. IBM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolAZNIBM
5-Day Price Return2.95%2.29%
13-Week Price Return12.30%-9.63%
26-Week Price Return0.63%-6.42%
52-Week Price Return-9.49%24.56%
Month-to-Date Return4.04%-4.19%
Year-to-Date Return12.55%10.34%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.07M5.60M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.56M4.60M
3-Month Volatility22.19%24.47%
Beta0.980.69

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

AZN

19.84%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
38.59%
Q3
19.84%
Median
11.90%
Q1
5.63%
Min
-9.96%

AZN’s Return on Equity of 19.84% is on par with the norm for the Pharmaceuticals industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

IBM

21.99%

IT Services Industry

Max
29.51%
Q3
16.98%
Median
13.47%
Q1
7.93%
Min
-3.97%

In the upper quartile for the IT Services industry, IBM’s Return on Equity of 21.99% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

AZN vs. IBM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

AZN

14.68%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
34.51%
Q3
17.73%
Median
12.12%
Q1
5.99%
Min
-7.73%

AZN’s Net Profit Margin of 14.68% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Pharmaceuticals industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

IBM

9.11%

IT Services Industry

Max
19.82%
Q3
11.49%
Median
6.67%
Q1
3.61%
Min
-4.62%

IBM’s Net Profit Margin of 9.11% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the IT Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

AZN vs. IBM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

AZN

20.04%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
41.53%
Q3
23.00%
Median
16.24%
Q1
9.24%
Min
-6.94%

AZN’s Operating Profit Margin of 20.04% is around the midpoint for the Pharmaceuticals industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

IBM

9.77%

IT Services Industry

Max
21.69%
Q3
14.50%
Median
10.06%
Q1
6.98%
Min
0.06%

IBM’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.77% is around the midpoint for the IT Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

AZN vs. IBM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAZNIBM
Return on Equity (TTM)19.84%21.99%
Return on Assets (TTM)7.76%4.12%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)14.68%9.11%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)20.04%9.77%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)82.07%57.57%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

AZN

0.86

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
4.49
Q3
2.77
Median
1.74
Q1
1.26
Min
0.11

AZN’s Current Ratio of 0.86 falls into the lower quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

IBM

0.91

IT Services Industry

Max
2.42
Q3
1.81
Median
1.47
Q1
1.09
Min
0.44

IBM’s Current Ratio of 0.91 falls into the lower quartile for the IT Services industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

AZN vs. IBM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

AZN

0.73

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
2.44
Q3
1.07
Median
0.42
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

AZN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.73 is typical for the Pharmaceuticals industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

IBM

2.33

IT Services Industry

Max
2.33
Q3
1.17
Median
0.54
Q1
0.15
Min
0.00

IBM’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the IT Services industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.33. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

AZN vs. IBM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

AZN

9.51

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
103.95
Q3
44.18
Median
9.83
Q1
2.82
Min
-42.71

AZN’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 9.51 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Pharmaceuticals industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

IBM

45.57

IT Services Industry

Max
144.50
Q3
84.49
Median
13.76
Q1
2.59
Min
-28.13

IBM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 45.57 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the IT Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

AZN vs. IBM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAZNIBM
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.860.91
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.670.80
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.732.33
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)9.5145.57

Growth

Revenue Growth

AZN vs. IBM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

AZN vs. IBM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

AZN

2.00%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
6.98%
Q3
3.32%
Median
2.13%
Q1
0.14%
Min
0.00%

AZN’s Dividend Yield of 2.00% is consistent with its peers in the Pharmaceuticals industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

IBM

2.76%

IT Services Industry

Max
2.80%
Q3
1.74%
Median
0.62%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 2.76%, IBM offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the IT Services industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

AZN vs. IBM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

AZN

59.51%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
165.20%
Q3
90.59%
Median
49.13%
Q1
28.91%
Min
0.00%

AZN’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 59.51% is within the typical range for the Pharmaceuticals industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

IBM

75.57%

IT Services Industry

Max
147.75%
Q3
63.58%
Median
24.63%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

IBM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 75.57% is in the upper quartile for the IT Services industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

AZN vs. IBM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAZNIBM
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.00%2.76%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)59.51%75.57%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

AZN

29.72

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
42.51
Q3
26.88
Median
19.11
Q1
15.12
Min
0.00

A P/E Ratio of 29.72 places AZN in the upper quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

IBM

38.56

IT Services Industry

Max
41.55
Q3
31.54
Median
23.25
Q1
18.12
Min
6.57

A P/E Ratio of 38.56 places IBM in the upper quartile for the IT Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

AZN vs. IBM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

AZN

4.36

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
7.55
Q3
4.54
Median
2.11
Q1
1.52
Min
0.00

AZN’s P/S Ratio of 4.36 aligns with the market consensus for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

IBM

3.51

IT Services Industry

Max
6.61
Q3
4.37
Median
2.02
Q1
1.20
Min
0.19

IBM’s P/S Ratio of 3.51 aligns with the market consensus for the IT Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

AZN vs. IBM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

AZN

4.74

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
9.78
Q3
4.96
Median
2.23
Q1
1.46
Min
0.60

AZN’s P/B Ratio of 4.74 is within the conventional range for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

IBM

9.96

IT Services Industry

Max
11.19
Q3
6.38
Median
3.47
Q1
2.31
Min
0.96

IBM’s P/B Ratio of 9.96 is in the upper tier for the IT Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

AZN vs. IBM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAZNIBM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)29.7238.56
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.363.51
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.749.96
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)30.1319.13