AXP vs. USB: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AXP and USB, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
AXP dwarfs USB in market cap, clocking in at 200.37 billion USD—about 3.00 times the 66.82 billion USD of its counterpart.
AXP at 1.24 and USB at 0.99 move in sync when it comes to market volatility.
| Symbol | AXP | USB |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | American Express Company | U.S. Bancorp |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Financial Services | Financial Services |
| Industry | Financial - Credit Services | Banks - Regional |
| CEO | Mr. Stephen Joseph Squeri | Ms. Gunjan Kedia |
| Price | 286 USD | 42.89 USD |
| Market Cap | 200.37 billion USD | 66.82 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.239 | 0.992 |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| IPO Date | June 1, 1972 | May 3, 1973 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AXP and USB over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between AXP and USB, please refer to the table below.
| Symbol | AXP | USB |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 19.51 | 10.00 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 1.83 | 0.97 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 2.66 | 2.20 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 6.43 | 1.11 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 17.71 | 5.93 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 13.57 | 33.82 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 2.67 | 4.72 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 17.74 | 12.76 |
Dividend Comparison
Both AXP at 1.02% and USB at 4.64% pay dividends, blending income with growth in their strategies. Yet USB’s 4.64% yield, 354% above AXP’s 1.02%, suggests a focus on generous payouts—possibly from stronger profits—while AXP leans toward reinvestment, perhaps due to tighter margins.
| Symbol | AXP | USB |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.02% | 4.64% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AXP and USB, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- For both AXP (0.32) and USB (0.00), current ratios sit below 1. With current assets trailing short-term liabilities, they might tap into cash flow or borrowing to stay afloat—a setup not uncommon in certain sectors, though it bears monitoring if cash gets tight.
- AXP (0.32) and USB (0.00) both clock quick ratios under 0.8. Without inventory, their liquid assets don’t match short-term debts, so they might lean on sales or loans to cover the difference—doable if cash keeps flowing.
- USB’s 0.76 sits under 1.5, where earnings hug interest costs too closely—a squeeze if income dips. Meanwhile, AXP at 1.59 has room to breathe.
| Symbol | AXP | USB |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 0.32 | 0.00 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.32 | 0.00 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 1.69 | 1.28 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.19 | 0.11 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 1.59 | 0.76 |