AXP vs. GS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AXP and GS, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
AXP (200.37 billion USD) and GS (182.10 billion USD) sit neck-and-neck in market cap terms.
AXP at 1.24 and GS at 1.31 move in sync when it comes to market volatility.
| Symbol | AXP | GS |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | American Express Company | The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Financial Services | Financial Services |
| Industry | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Capital Markets |
| CEO | Mr. Stephen Joseph Squeri | Mr. David Solomon |
| Price | 286 USD | 593.46 USD |
| Market Cap | 200.37 billion USD | 182.10 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.239 | 1.311 |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| IPO Date | June 1, 1972 | May 4, 1999 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AXP and GS over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of AXP and GS based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- GS has a negative Price-to-Free Cash Flow of -7.43, indicating it’s spent more cash than it’s brought in over the past year—a cash flow shortfall that raises questions about its operational sustainability. Meanwhile, AXP at 17.71 maintains a positive cash position.
| Symbol | AXP | GS |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 19.51 | 12.79 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 1.83 | 1.07 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 2.66 | 3.54 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 6.43 | 107.80 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 17.71 | -7.43 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 13.57 | 9.85 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 2.67 | 3.54 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 17.74 | -7.43 |
Dividend Comparison
Both AXP at 1.02% and GS at 1.98% pay dividends, blending income with growth in their strategies. Yet GS’s 1.98% yield, 94% above AXP’s 1.02%, suggests a focus on generous payouts—possibly from stronger profits—while AXP leans toward reinvestment, perhaps due to tighter margins.
| Symbol | AXP | GS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.02% | 1.98% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AXP and GS, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- AXP posts a current ratio of 0.32 under 1, where current assets fall short of covering short-term debts—manageable perhaps with solid cash inflows. Compare that to GS, sitting at 2.35, where liabilities are comfortably met.
- AXP’s quick ratio sits at 0.32 below 0.8, leaving its cash and near-cash assets shy of short-term obligations—potentially a stretch without extra funds. Meanwhile, GS lands at 2.35, with enough liquidity to spare.
- GS’s 0.23 sits under 1.5, where earnings hug interest costs too closely—a squeeze if income dips. Meanwhile, AXP at 1.59 has room to breathe.
| Symbol | AXP | GS |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 0.32 | 2.35 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.32 | 2.35 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 1.69 | 0.04 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.19 | 0.02 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 1.59 | 0.23 |