Seek Returns logo

AXON vs. FER: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AXON and FER, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolAXONFER
Company NameAxon Enterprise, Inc.Ferrovial SE
CountryUnited StatesNetherlands
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryAerospace & DefenseConstruction & Engineering
Market Capitalization56.17 billion USD42.88 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateJune 19, 2001August 13, 2012
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AXON and FER by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AXON vs. FER: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolAXONFER
5-Day Price Return-0.07%3.94%
13-Week Price Return-10.05%12.12%
26-Week Price Return36.04%21.76%
52-Week Price Return76.88%35.15%
Month-to-Date Return-0.30%2.79%
Year-to-Date Return20.39%23.50%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.61M0.86M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.62M0.64M
3-Month Volatility52.01%14.19%
Beta1.390.95

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

AXON

13.43%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
37.11%
Q3
20.14%
Median
11.72%
Q1
6.30%
Min
-6.24%

AXON’s Return on Equity of 13.43% is on par with the norm for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

FER

56.21%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
26.79%
Q3
16.47%
Median
10.66%
Q1
8.46%
Min
-1.86%

FER’s Return on Equity of 56.21% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

AXON vs. FER: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

AXON

13.64%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
13.66%
Q3
8.61%
Median
6.59%
Q1
4.92%
Min
1.01%

A Net Profit Margin of 13.64% places AXON in the upper quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

FER

35.99%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
11.67%
Q3
6.13%
Median
3.82%
Q1
2.31%
Min
-2.77%

FER’s Net Profit Margin of 35.99% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

AXON vs. FER: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

AXON

-1.26%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
22.35%
Q3
12.83%
Median
9.29%
Q1
6.38%
Min
-2.15%

AXON has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -1.26%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

FER

34.91%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
17.78%
Q3
9.61%
Median
6.19%
Q1
3.73%
Min
-1.78%

FER’s Operating Profit Margin of 34.91% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

AXON vs. FER: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAXONFER
Return on Equity (TTM)13.43%56.21%
Return on Assets (TTM)6.28%12.11%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)13.64%35.99%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-1.26%34.91%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)60.47%87.83%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

AXON

2.95

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
3.35
Q3
2.03
Median
1.24
Q1
1.04
Min
0.77

AXON’s Current Ratio of 2.95 is in the upper quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

FER

0.94

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.17
Q3
1.50
Median
1.23
Q1
1.00
Min
0.65

FER’s Current Ratio of 0.94 falls into the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

AXON vs. FER: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

AXON

0.73

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
1.72
Q3
0.96
Median
0.63
Q1
0.37
Min
0.03

AXON’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.73 is typical for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

FER

1.95

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.37
Q3
1.24
Median
0.62
Q1
0.31
Min
0.00

FER’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Construction & Engineering industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.95. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

AXON vs. FER: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

AXON

888.35

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
36.57
Q3
19.08
Median
7.25
Q1
2.65
Min
-7.63

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 888.35, AXON demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

FER

9.20

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
36.37
Q3
17.88
Median
8.20
Q1
4.98
Min
-6.49

FER’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 9.20 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

AXON vs. FER: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAXONFER
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.950.94
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.560.86
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.731.95
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)888.359.20

Growth

Revenue Growth

AXON vs. FER: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

AXON vs. FER: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

AXON

0.00%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
2.72%
Q3
1.45%
Median
0.48%
Q1
0.08%
Min
0.00%

AXON currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

FER

0.34%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
5.80%
Q3
3.33%
Median
2.22%
Q1
0.21%
Min
0.00%

FER’s Dividend Yield of 0.34% is consistent with its peers in the Construction & Engineering industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

AXON vs. FER: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

AXON

0.00%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
110.40%
Q3
50.43%
Median
17.11%
Q1
0.46%
Min
0.00%

AXON has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

FER

3.63%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
139.17%
Q3
74.39%
Median
51.48%
Q1
15.67%
Min
0.00%

FER’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 3.63% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

AXON vs. FER: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAXONFER
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.34%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%3.63%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

AXON

172.14

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
67.20
Q3
55.74
Median
33.28
Q1
27.49
Min
15.02

At 172.14, AXON’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

FER

10.70

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
41.00
Q3
26.91
Median
16.02
Q1
13.49
Min
1.65

In the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, FER’s P/E Ratio of 10.70 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

AXON vs. FER: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

AXON

23.49

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
9.06
Q3
4.87
Median
2.47
Q1
1.61
Min
0.33

With a P/S Ratio of 23.49, AXON trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Aerospace & Defense industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

FER

3.85

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.93
Q3
1.65
Median
0.71
Q1
0.45
Min
0.11

With a P/S Ratio of 3.85, FER trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Construction & Engineering industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

AXON vs. FER: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

AXON

23.59

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
14.90
Q3
8.93
Median
4.70
Q1
3.03
Min
0.83

At 23.59, AXON’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Aerospace & Defense industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

FER

5.63

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
7.96
Q3
4.06
Median
1.98
Q1
1.23
Min
0.24

FER’s P/B Ratio of 5.63 is in the upper tier for the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

AXON vs. FER: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAXONFER
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)172.1410.70
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)23.493.85
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)23.595.63
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)154.9131.40