Seek Returns logo

AWR vs. WTRG: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AWR and WTRG, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

WTRG’s market capitalization of 10.31 billion USD is significantly greater than AWR’s 2.97 billion USD, highlighting its more substantial market valuation.

With betas of 0.61 for AWR and 0.80 for WTRG, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.

SymbolAWRWTRG
Company NameAmerican States Water CompanyEssential Utilities, Inc.
CountryUSUS
SectorUtilitiesUtilities
IndustryRegulated WaterRegulated Water
CEORobert J. SprowlsChristopher H. Franklin
Price77.16 USD36.78 USD
Market Cap2.97 billion USD10.31 billion USD
Beta0.610.80
ExchangeNYSENYSE
IPO DateFebruary 21, 1973March 17, 1980
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AWR and WTRG by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AWR vs. WTRG: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AWR

13.70%

Regulated Water Industry

Max
10.35%
Q3
10.08%
Median
8.98%
Q1
8.05%
Min
7.36%

AWR’s Return on Equity of 13.70% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Regulated Water industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

WTRG

9.81%

Regulated Water Industry

Max
10.35%
Q3
10.08%
Median
8.98%
Q1
8.05%
Min
7.36%

WTRG’s Return on Equity of 9.81% is on par with the norm for the Regulated Water industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

AWR vs. WTRG: A comparison of their ROE against the Regulated Water industry benchmark.

Return on Invested Capital

AWR

6.36%

Regulated Water Industry

Max
6.92%
Q3
6.34%
Median
4.28%
Q1
3.77%
Min
2.54%

In the upper quartile for the Regulated Water industry, AWR’s Return on Invested Capital of 6.36% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

WTRG

5.13%

Regulated Water Industry

Max
6.92%
Q3
6.34%
Median
4.28%
Q1
3.77%
Min
2.54%

WTRG’s Return on Invested Capital of 5.13% is in line with the norm for the Regulated Water industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

AWR vs. WTRG: A comparison of their ROIC against the Regulated Water industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin

AWR

20.22%

Regulated Water Industry

Max
27.17%
Q3
24.08%
Median
20.75%
Q1
16.72%
Min
6.15%

AWR’s Net Profit Margin of 20.22% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Regulated Water industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

WTRG

27.17%

Regulated Water Industry

Max
27.17%
Q3
24.08%
Median
20.75%
Q1
16.72%
Min
6.15%

A Net Profit Margin of 27.17% places WTRG in the upper quartile for the Regulated Water industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

AWR vs. WTRG: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against the Regulated Water industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin

AWR

31.41%

Regulated Water Industry

Max
42.87%
Q3
36.84%
Median
28.06%
Q1
23.46%
Min
12.18%

AWR’s Operating Profit Margin of 31.41% is around the midpoint for the Regulated Water industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

WTRG

38.35%

Regulated Water Industry

Max
42.87%
Q3
36.84%
Median
28.06%
Q1
23.46%
Min
12.18%

An Operating Profit Margin of 38.35% places WTRG in the upper quartile for the Regulated Water industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

AWR vs. WTRG: A comparison of their Operating Margin against the Regulated Water industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAWRWTRG
Return on Equity (TTM)13.70%9.81%
Return on Assets (TTM)4.83%3.35%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)6.36%5.13%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)20.22%27.17%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)31.41%38.35%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)69.36%59.24%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AWR

0.81

Regulated Water Industry

Max
0.98
Q3
0.94
Median
0.81
Q1
0.59
Min
0.46

AWR’s Current Ratio of 0.81 aligns with the median group of the Regulated Water industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

WTRG

0.65

Regulated Water Industry

Max
0.98
Q3
0.94
Median
0.81
Q1
0.59
Min
0.46

WTRG’s Current Ratio of 0.65 aligns with the median group of the Regulated Water industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

AWR vs. WTRG: A comparison of their Current Ratio against the Regulated Water industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AWR

0.99

Regulated Water Industry

Max
1.38
Q3
1.15
Median
0.90
Q1
0.77
Min
0.68

AWR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.99 is typical for the Regulated Water industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

WTRG

1.20

Regulated Water Industry

Max
1.38
Q3
1.15
Median
0.90
Q1
0.77
Min
0.68

WTRG’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Regulated Water industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.20. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

AWR vs. WTRG: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against the Regulated Water industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AWR

3.85

Regulated Water Industry

Max
4.22
Q3
4.04
Median
3.07
Q1
3.00
Min
2.48

AWR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.85 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Regulated Water industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

WTRG

2.78

Regulated Water Industry

Max
4.22
Q3
4.04
Median
3.07
Q1
3.00
Min
2.48

In the lower quartile for the Regulated Water industry, WTRG’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.78 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

AWR vs. WTRG: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against the Regulated Water industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAWRWTRG
Current Ratio (TTM)0.810.65
Quick Ratio (TTM)0.760.57
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.991.20
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.370.42
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)3.836.10
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)3.852.78

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AWR and WTRG. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AWR vs. WTRG: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AWR vs. WTRG: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AWR vs. WTRG: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AWR

2.41%

Regulated Water Industry

Max
3.58%
Q3
2.94%
Median
2.44%
Q1
2.07%
Min
0.81%

AWR’s Dividend Yield of 2.41% is consistent with its peers in the Regulated Water industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

WTRG

3.54%

Regulated Water Industry

Max
3.58%
Q3
2.94%
Median
2.44%
Q1
2.07%
Min
0.81%

With a Dividend Yield of 3.54%, WTRG offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Regulated Water industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

AWR vs. WTRG: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against the Regulated Water industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AWR

56.01%

Regulated Water Industry

Max
99.35%
Q3
57.39%
Median
55.65%
Q1
52.94%
Min
0.00%

AWR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 56.01% is within the typical range for the Regulated Water industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

WTRG

57.38%

Regulated Water Industry

Max
99.35%
Q3
57.39%
Median
55.65%
Q1
52.94%
Min
0.00%

WTRG’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 57.38% is within the typical range for the Regulated Water industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

AWR vs. WTRG: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against the Regulated Water industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAWRWTRG
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.41%3.54%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)56.01%57.38%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AWR

24.00

Regulated Water Industry

Max
26.42
Q3
23.54
Median
20.16
Q1
17.14
Min
8.21

A P/E Ratio of 24.00 places AWR in the upper quartile for the Regulated Water industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

WTRG

16.50

Regulated Water Industry

Max
26.42
Q3
23.54
Median
20.16
Q1
17.14
Min
8.21

In the lower quartile for the Regulated Water industry, WTRG’s P/E Ratio of 16.50 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

AWR vs. WTRG: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against the Regulated Water industry benchmark.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AWR

3.80

Regulated Water Industry

Max
3.77
Q3
3.33
Median
2.11
Q1
1.48
Min
0.23

AWR’s Forward PEG Ratio of 3.80 is exceptionally high for the Regulated Water industry. This suggests its stock price is very high relative to its expected earnings growth, signaling significant overvaluation risk.

WTRG

2.63

Regulated Water Industry

Max
3.77
Q3
3.33
Median
2.11
Q1
1.48
Min
0.23

WTRG’s Forward PEG Ratio of 2.63 is within the middle range of its peers in the Regulated Water industry. This suggests a reasonable balance between the stock’s price and its expected growth, aligning with sector valuation norms.

AWR vs. WTRG: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against the Regulated Water industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AWR

4.89

Regulated Water Industry

Max
6.05
Q3
4.92
Median
3.71
Q1
2.93
Min
2.18

AWR’s P/S Ratio of 4.89 aligns with the market consensus for the Regulated Water industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

WTRG

4.57

Regulated Water Industry

Max
6.05
Q3
4.92
Median
3.71
Q1
2.93
Min
2.18

WTRG’s P/S Ratio of 4.57 aligns with the market consensus for the Regulated Water industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

AWR vs. WTRG: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against the Regulated Water industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AWR

3.09

Regulated Water Industry

Max
3.06
Q3
2.19
Median
1.97
Q1
1.62
Min
1.25

At 3.09, AWR’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Regulated Water industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

WTRG

1.57

Regulated Water Industry

Max
3.06
Q3
2.19
Median
1.97
Q1
1.62
Min
1.25

WTRG’s P/B Ratio of 1.57 is in the lower quartile for the Regulated Water industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

AWR vs. WTRG: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against the Regulated Water industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAWRWTRG
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)24.0016.50
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)3.802.63
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)4.894.57
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)3.091.57
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)-55.03-19.90
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)16.1114.21
EV-to-Sales (TTM)6.418.01