Seek Returns logo

AWK vs. CWT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AWK and CWT, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

AWK’s market capitalization of 27.31 billion USD is substantially larger than CWT’s 2.73 billion USD, indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.

With betas of 0.70 for AWK and 0.65 for CWT, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.

SymbolAWKCWT
Company NameAmerican Water Works Company, Inc.California Water Service Group
CountryUSUS
SectorUtilitiesUtilities
IndustryRegulated WaterRegulated Water
CEOJohn C. GriffithMartin A. Kropelnicki
Price140.05 USD45.81 USD
Market Cap27.31 billion USD2.73 billion USD
Beta0.700.65
ExchangeNYSENYSE
IPO DateApril 23, 2008March 26, 1990
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AWK and CWT by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AWK vs. CWT: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AWK

10.35%

Regulated Water Industry

Max
10.35%
Q3
10.08%
Median
8.98%
Q1
8.05%
Min
7.36%

In the upper quartile for the Regulated Water industry, AWK’s Return on Equity of 10.35% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

CWT

8.33%

Regulated Water Industry

Max
10.35%
Q3
10.08%
Median
8.98%
Q1
8.05%
Min
7.36%

CWT’s Return on Equity of 8.33% is on par with the norm for the Regulated Water industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

AWK vs. CWT: A comparison of their ROE against the Regulated Water industry benchmark.

Return on Invested Capital

AWK

4.28%

Regulated Water Industry

Max
6.92%
Q3
6.34%
Median
4.28%
Q1
3.77%
Min
2.54%

AWK’s Return on Invested Capital of 4.28% is in line with the norm for the Regulated Water industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

CWT

2.99%

Regulated Water Industry

Max
6.92%
Q3
6.34%
Median
4.28%
Q1
3.77%
Min
2.54%

CWT’s Return on Invested Capital of 2.99% is in the lower quartile for the Regulated Water industry. This indicates a less efficient conversion of invested capital into profit compared to most of its competitors.

AWK vs. CWT: A comparison of their ROIC against the Regulated Water industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin

AWK

22.24%

Regulated Water Industry

Max
27.17%
Q3
24.08%
Median
20.75%
Q1
16.72%
Min
6.15%

AWK’s Net Profit Margin of 22.24% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Regulated Water industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

CWT

13.84%

Regulated Water Industry

Max
27.17%
Q3
24.08%
Median
20.75%
Q1
16.72%
Min
6.15%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Regulated Water industry, CWT’s Net Profit Margin of 13.84% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

AWK vs. CWT: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against the Regulated Water industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin

AWK

36.59%

Regulated Water Industry

Max
42.87%
Q3
36.84%
Median
28.06%
Q1
23.46%
Min
12.18%

AWK’s Operating Profit Margin of 36.59% is around the midpoint for the Regulated Water industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CWT

18.37%

Regulated Water Industry

Max
42.87%
Q3
36.84%
Median
28.06%
Q1
23.46%
Min
12.18%

CWT’s Operating Profit Margin of 18.37% is in the lower quartile for the Regulated Water industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

AWK vs. CWT: A comparison of their Operating Margin against the Regulated Water industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAWKCWT
Return on Equity (TTM)10.35%8.33%
Return on Assets (TTM)3.23%2.55%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)4.28%2.99%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)22.24%13.84%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)36.59%18.37%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)56.18%54.87%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AWK

0.49

Regulated Water Industry

Max
0.98
Q3
0.94
Median
0.81
Q1
0.59
Min
0.46

AWK’s Current Ratio of 0.49 falls into the lower quartile for the Regulated Water industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

CWT

0.53

Regulated Water Industry

Max
0.98
Q3
0.94
Median
0.81
Q1
0.59
Min
0.46

CWT’s Current Ratio of 0.53 falls into the lower quartile for the Regulated Water industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

AWK vs. CWT: A comparison of their Current Ratio against the Regulated Water industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AWK

1.38

Regulated Water Industry

Max
1.38
Q3
1.15
Median
0.90
Q1
0.77
Min
0.68

AWK’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Regulated Water industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.38. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

CWT

0.90

Regulated Water Industry

Max
1.38
Q3
1.15
Median
0.90
Q1
0.77
Min
0.68

CWT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.90 is typical for the Regulated Water industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

AWK vs. CWT: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against the Regulated Water industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AWK

3.24

Regulated Water Industry

Max
4.22
Q3
4.04
Median
3.07
Q1
3.00
Min
2.48

AWK’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.24 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Regulated Water industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CWT

3.06

Regulated Water Industry

Max
4.22
Q3
4.04
Median
3.07
Q1
3.00
Min
2.48

CWT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.06 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Regulated Water industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

AWK vs. CWT: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against the Regulated Water industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAWKCWT
Current Ratio (TTM)0.490.53
Quick Ratio (TTM)0.440.53
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)1.380.90
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.440.28
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)5.314.16
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)3.243.06

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AWK and CWT. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AWK vs. CWT: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AWK vs. CWT: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AWK vs. CWT: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AWK

2.23%

Regulated Water Industry

Max
3.58%
Q3
2.94%
Median
2.44%
Q1
2.07%
Min
0.81%

AWK’s Dividend Yield of 2.23% is consistent with its peers in the Regulated Water industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CWT

2.62%

Regulated Water Industry

Max
3.58%
Q3
2.94%
Median
2.44%
Q1
2.07%
Min
0.81%

CWT’s Dividend Yield of 2.62% is consistent with its peers in the Regulated Water industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

AWK vs. CWT: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against the Regulated Water industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AWK

55.65%

Regulated Water Industry

Max
99.35%
Q3
57.39%
Median
55.65%
Q1
52.94%
Min
0.00%

AWK’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 55.65% is within the typical range for the Regulated Water industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CWT

51.80%

Regulated Water Industry

Max
99.35%
Q3
57.39%
Median
55.65%
Q1
52.94%
Min
0.00%

CWT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 51.80% is in the lower quartile for the Regulated Water industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

AWK vs. CWT: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against the Regulated Water industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAWKCWT
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.23%2.62%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)55.65%51.80%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AWK

25.50

Regulated Water Industry

Max
26.42
Q3
23.54
Median
20.16
Q1
17.14
Min
8.21

A P/E Ratio of 25.50 places AWK in the upper quartile for the Regulated Water industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

CWT

20.31

Regulated Water Industry

Max
26.42
Q3
23.54
Median
20.16
Q1
17.14
Min
8.21

CWT’s P/E Ratio of 20.31 is within the middle range for the Regulated Water industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

AWK vs. CWT: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against the Regulated Water industry benchmark.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AWK

3.73

Regulated Water Industry

Max
3.77
Q3
3.33
Median
2.11
Q1
1.48
Min
0.23

A Forward PEG Ratio of 3.73 places AWK in the upper quartile for the Regulated Water industry. This suggests the stock is potentially expensive compared to its peers relative to its growth forecast, which may warrant caution.

CWT

2.12

Regulated Water Industry

Max
3.77
Q3
3.33
Median
2.11
Q1
1.48
Min
0.23

CWT’s Forward PEG Ratio of 2.12 is within the middle range of its peers in the Regulated Water industry. This suggests a reasonable balance between the stock’s price and its expected growth, aligning with sector valuation norms.

AWK vs. CWT: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against the Regulated Water industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AWK

5.67

Regulated Water Industry

Max
6.05
Q3
4.92
Median
3.71
Q1
2.93
Min
2.18

AWK’s P/S Ratio of 5.67 is in the upper echelon for the Regulated Water industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

CWT

2.81

Regulated Water Industry

Max
6.05
Q3
4.92
Median
3.71
Q1
2.93
Min
2.18

In the lower quartile for the Regulated Water industry, CWT’s P/S Ratio of 2.81 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

AWK vs. CWT: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against the Regulated Water industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AWK

2.59

Regulated Water Industry

Max
3.06
Q3
2.19
Median
1.97
Q1
1.62
Min
1.25

AWK’s P/B Ratio of 2.59 is in the upper tier for the Regulated Water industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

CWT

1.67

Regulated Water Industry

Max
3.06
Q3
2.19
Median
1.97
Q1
1.62
Min
1.25

CWT’s P/B Ratio of 1.67 is within the conventional range for the Regulated Water industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

AWK vs. CWT: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against the Regulated Water industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAWKCWT
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)25.5020.31
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)3.732.12
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)5.672.81
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)2.591.67
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)-31.04-16.21
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)15.3911.93
EV-to-Sales (TTM)8.664.32