Seek Returns logo

AVGO vs. JBL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AVGO and JBL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolAVGOJBL
Company NameBroadcom Inc.Jabil Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS IndustrySemiconductors & Semiconductor EquipmentElectronic Equipment, Instruments & Components
Market Capitalization1,633.77 billion USD21.46 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateAugust 6, 2009May 3, 1993
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AVGO and JBL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AVGO vs. JBL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolAVGOJBL
5-Day Price Return-4.44%-7.93%
13-Week Price Return11.79%-6.25%
26-Week Price Return47.35%20.87%
52-Week Price Return97.29%53.25%
Month-to-Date Return-7.35%-8.61%
Year-to-Date Return47.71%40.28%
10-Day Avg. Volume18.63M1.07M
3-Month Avg. Volume21.45M1.35M
3-Month Volatility46.12%39.96%
Beta1.221.26

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

AVGO

27.01%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
49.05%
Q3
22.19%
Median
7.96%
Q1
0.99%
Min
-15.65%

In the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, AVGO’s Return on Equity of 27.01% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

JBL

45.71%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
25.62%
Q3
13.32%
Median
9.23%
Q1
4.70%
Min
-3.60%

JBL’s Return on Equity of 45.71% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

AVGO vs. JBL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

AVGO

31.59%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
52.41%
Q3
24.47%
Median
11.88%
Q1
0.60%
Min
-25.46%

A Net Profit Margin of 31.59% places AVGO in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

JBL

2.20%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
18.22%
Q3
10.34%
Median
7.81%
Q1
3.28%
Min
-4.57%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, JBL’s Net Profit Margin of 2.20% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

AVGO vs. JBL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

AVGO

37.81%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
58.09%
Q3
27.76%
Median
12.14%
Q1
3.29%
Min
-32.60%

An Operating Profit Margin of 37.81% places AVGO in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

JBL

3.97%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
26.64%
Q3
15.10%
Median
9.55%
Q1
4.57%
Min
-7.07%

JBL’s Operating Profit Margin of 3.97% is in the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

AVGO vs. JBL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAVGOJBL
Return on Equity (TTM)27.01%45.71%
Return on Assets (TTM)11.45%3.64%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)31.59%2.20%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)37.81%3.97%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)67.03%8.88%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

AVGO

1.50

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
6.57
Q3
4.28
Median
2.86
Q1
2.22
Min
1.02

AVGO’s Current Ratio of 1.50 falls into the lower quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

JBL

1.00

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
5.52
Q3
3.20
Median
2.02
Q1
1.51
Min
0.33

JBL’s Current Ratio of 1.00 falls into the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

AVGO vs. JBL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

AVGO

0.88

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
1.18
Q3
0.48
Median
0.24
Q1
0.01
Min
0.00

AVGO’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.88. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

JBL

1.91

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
1.12
Q3
0.55
Median
0.33
Q1
0.10
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.91, JBL operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

AVGO vs. JBL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

AVGO

3.83

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
174.00
Q3
81.21
Median
22.37
Q1
6.43
Min
-7.80

In the lower quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, AVGO’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.83 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

JBL

5.62

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
114.40
Q3
51.32
Median
14.03
Q1
3.74
Min
-61.15

JBL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.62 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

AVGO vs. JBL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAVGOJBL
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.501.00
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.370.51
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.881.91
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)3.835.62

Growth

Revenue Growth

AVGO vs. JBL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

AVGO vs. JBL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

AVGO

0.66%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
3.58%
Q3
1.59%
Median
0.61%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AVGO’s Dividend Yield of 0.66% is consistent with its peers in the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

JBL

0.17%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
5.16%
Q3
2.39%
Median
1.18%
Q1
0.12%
Min
0.00%

JBL’s Dividend Yield of 0.17% is consistent with its peers in the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

AVGO vs. JBL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

AVGO

57.20%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
211.90%
Q3
88.01%
Median
25.84%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AVGO’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 57.20% is within the typical range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

JBL

5.48%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
197.57%
Q3
87.33%
Median
36.23%
Q1
3.99%
Min
0.00%

JBL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 5.48% is within the typical range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

AVGO vs. JBL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAVGOJBL
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.66%0.17%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)57.20%5.48%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

AVGO

86.25

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
95.58
Q3
58.67
Median
34.77
Q1
25.45
Min
12.63

A P/E Ratio of 86.25 places AVGO in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

JBL

32.70

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
71.05
Q3
42.87
Median
27.84
Q1
19.17
Min
7.73

JBL’s P/E Ratio of 32.70 is within the middle range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

AVGO vs. JBL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

AVGO

27.25

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
18.34
Q3
10.38
Median
5.38
Q1
2.49
Min
0.32

With a P/S Ratio of 27.25, AVGO trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

JBL

0.72

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
7.81
Q3
4.01
Median
2.09
Q1
1.25
Min
0.16

In the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, JBL’s P/S Ratio of 0.72 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

AVGO vs. JBL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

AVGO

19.11

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
16.22
Q3
8.33
Median
4.39
Q1
1.79
Min
0.30

At 19.11, AVGO’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

JBL

14.53

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
7.49
Q3
4.09
Median
2.35
Q1
1.55
Min
0.44

At 14.53, JBL’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

AVGO vs. JBL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAVGOJBL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)86.2532.70
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)27.250.72
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)19.1114.53
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)65.5018.33