AVGO vs. CFLT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AVGO and CFLT, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
AVGO dwarfs CFLT in market cap, clocking in at 1,080.18 billion USD—about 150.75 times the 7.17 billion USD of its counterpart.
AVGO at 1.06 and CFLT at 1.02 move in sync when it comes to market volatility.
| Symbol | AVGO | CFLT |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Broadcom Inc. | Confluent, Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Semiconductors | Software - Infrastructure |
| CEO | Mr. Hock E. Tan | Mr. Edward Kreps |
| Price | 229.73 USD | 21.05 USD |
| Market Cap | 1,080.18 billion USD | 7.17 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.059 | 1.025 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NASDAQ |
| IPO Date | August 6, 2009 | June 24, 2021 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AVGO and CFLT over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of AVGO and CFLT based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- AVGO carries a lofty P/E of 107.08, where its market price towers over its earnings from the past year—investors are paying a significant premium for each dollar of profit. In stark contrast, CFLT at -22.11 is negative, revealing a complete absence of net earnings over the same period.
- Both AVGO at -1.07 and CFLT at -0.66 show negative Forward PEG values. This signals that analysts foresee either outright losses or a decline in earnings over the next period—a troubling outlook that casts doubt on their near-term profit potential.
| Symbol | AVGO | CFLT |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 107.08 | -22.11 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | -1.07 | -0.66 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 19.81 | 7.04 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 15.45 | 6.89 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 52.10 | 551.81 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 44.65 | -20.64 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 20.86 | 7.86 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 54.86 | 615.75 |
Dividend Comparison
AVGO’s 0.97% yield offers steady income while retaining earnings for growth, unlike CFLT, which pays none, reinvesting fully—likely in expansion or R&D—for investors eyeing future gains. This pits AVGO’s balanced approach against CFLT’s long-term focus.
| Symbol | AVGO | CFLT |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.97% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AVGO and CFLT, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- CFLT’s interest coverage comes up “--”, reflecting interest demands so faint they’re barely there—likely minimal debt or tiny rates—whereas AVGO at 0.00 cruises past interest with ease.
| Symbol | AVGO | CFLT |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 1.00 | 4.42 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.91 | 4.42 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.95 | 1.08 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.40 | 0.41 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 6.03 | -- |