Seek Returns logo

AVAV vs. VRT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AVAV and VRT, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

VRT’s market capitalization of 48.72 billion USD is significantly greater than AVAV’s 11.24 billion USD, highlighting its more substantial market valuation.

VRT carries a higher beta at 1.73, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while AVAV (beta: 0.81) exhibits greater stability.

SymbolAVAVVRT
Company NameAeroVironment, Inc.Vertiv Holdings Co
CountryUSUS
SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
IndustryAerospace & DefenseElectrical Equipment & Parts
CEOWahid NawabiGiordano Albertazzi
Price246.23 USD127.84 USD
Market Cap11.24 billion USD48.72 billion USD
Beta0.811.73
ExchangeNASDAQNYSE
IPO DateJanuary 23, 2007August 2, 2018
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AVAV and VRT by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AVAV vs. VRT: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AVAV

5.06%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
42.57%
Q3
16.67%
Median
8.39%
Q1
-0.77%
Min
-23.36%

AVAV’s Return on Equity of 5.06% is on par with the norm for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

VRT

31.53%

Electrical Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
40.77%
Q3
24.97%
Median
9.16%
Q1
-21.24%
Min
-83.49%

In the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment & Parts industry, VRT’s Return on Equity of 31.53% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

AVAV vs. VRT: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Electrical Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AVAV

4.16%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
23.42%
Q3
8.86%
Median
5.47%
Q1
-5.60%
Min
-22.46%

AVAV’s Return on Invested Capital of 4.16% is in line with the norm for the Aerospace & Defense industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

VRT

14.66%

Electrical Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
28.65%
Q3
9.59%
Median
4.18%
Q1
-26.21%
Min
-64.66%

In the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment & Parts industry, VRT’s Return on Invested Capital of 14.66% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

AVAV vs. VRT: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Electrical Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AVAV

5.54%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
22.67%
Q3
8.04%
Median
4.95%
Q1
-5.07%
Min
-16.58%

AVAV’s Net Profit Margin of 5.54% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Aerospace & Defense industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

VRT

7.92%

Electrical Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
18.22%
Q3
10.17%
Median
3.30%
Q1
-100.73%
Min
-135.80%

VRT’s Net Profit Margin of 7.92% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Electrical Equipment & Parts industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

AVAV vs. VRT: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Electrical Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AVAV

5.18%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
22.01%
Q3
11.49%
Median
8.96%
Q1
3.77%
Min
-4.96%

AVAV’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.18% is around the midpoint for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

VRT

17.31%

Electrical Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
19.88%
Q3
14.79%
Median
7.23%
Q1
-48.45%
Min
-140.29%

An Operating Profit Margin of 17.31% places VRT in the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment & Parts industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

AVAV vs. VRT: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Electrical Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAVAVVRT
Return on Equity (TTM)5.06%31.53%
Return on Assets (TTM)3.89%7.05%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)4.16%14.66%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)5.54%7.92%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)5.18%17.31%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)40.23%36.32%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AVAV

3.52

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
5.13
Q3
3.36
Median
2.16
Q1
1.20
Min
0.41

AVAV’s Current Ratio of 3.52 is in the upper quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

VRT

1.72

Electrical Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
4.74
Q3
3.44
Median
2.63
Q1
1.95
Min
1.17

VRT’s Current Ratio of 1.72 falls into the lower quartile for the Electrical Equipment & Parts industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

AVAV vs. VRT: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Electrical Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AVAV

0.04

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
1.20
Q3
0.73
Median
0.51
Q1
0.09
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry, AVAV’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.04 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

VRT

1.18

Electrical Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
0.82
Q3
0.68
Median
0.61
Q1
0.47
Min
0.33

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.18, VRT operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Electrical Equipment & Parts industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

AVAV vs. VRT: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Electrical Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AVAV

245.75

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
12.62
Q3
7.38
Median
2.95
Q1
1.68
Min
-6.68

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 245.75, AVAV demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

VRT

10.65

Electrical Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
21.00
Q3
9.09
Median
3.12
Q1
-7.14
Min
-31.43

VRT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 10.65 is in the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment & Parts industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

AVAV vs. VRT: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Electrical Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAVAVVRT
Current Ratio (TTM)3.521.72
Quick Ratio (TTM)2.691.28
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.041.18
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.030.33
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)-0.111.15
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)245.7510.65

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AVAV and VRT. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AVAV vs. VRT: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AVAV vs. VRT: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AVAV vs. VRT: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AVAV

0.00%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
6.00%
Q3
0.66%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AVAV currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

VRT

0.11%

Electrical Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
1.81%
Q3
0.50%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

VRT’s Dividend Yield of 0.11% is consistent with its peers in the Electrical Equipment & Parts industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

AVAV vs. VRT: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Electrical Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AVAV

0.00%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
172.02%
Q3
32.47%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AVAV has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

VRT

7.07%

Electrical Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
162.68%
Q3
20.84%
Median
4.65%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

VRT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 7.07% is within the typical range for the Electrical Equipment & Parts industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

AVAV vs. VRT: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Electrical Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAVAVVRT
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.11%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%7.07%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AVAV

158.45

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
75.34
Q3
54.40
Median
38.63
Q1
26.10
Min
16.44

At 158.45, AVAV’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

VRT

73.08

Electrical Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
27.52
Q3
27.52
Median
24.22
Q1
20.08
Min
9.48

At 73.08, VRT’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Electrical Equipment & Parts industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

AVAV vs. VRT: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Electrical Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AVAV

4.65

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
10.68
Q3
5.36
Median
2.31
Q1
1.47
Min
0.01

AVAV’s Forward PEG Ratio of 4.65 is within the middle range of its peers in the Aerospace & Defense industry. This suggests a reasonable balance between the stock’s price and its expected growth, aligning with sector valuation norms.

VRT

4.20

Electrical Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
5.30
Q3
4.04
Median
2.62
Q1
2.03
Min
0.01

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Electrical Equipment & Parts industry.

AVAV vs. VRT: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Electrical Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AVAV

14.27

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
19.34
Q3
9.54
Median
2.71
Q1
1.59
Min
0.35

AVAV’s P/S Ratio of 14.27 is in the upper echelon for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

VRT

5.79

Electrical Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
5.76
Q3
5.66
Median
3.18
Q1
1.88
Min
0.31

With a P/S Ratio of 5.79, VRT trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Electrical Equipment & Parts industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

AVAV vs. VRT: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Electrical Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AVAV

7.80

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
16.08
Q3
8.12
Median
4.12
Q1
2.69
Min
0.69

AVAV’s P/B Ratio of 7.80 is within the conventional range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

VRT

18.26

Electrical Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
10.91
Q3
6.77
Median
3.73
Q1
1.80
Min
0.59

At 18.26, VRT’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Electrical Equipment & Parts industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

AVAV vs. VRT: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Electrical Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAVAVVRT
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)158.4573.08
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)4.654.20
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)14.275.79
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)7.8018.26
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)-821.1537.37
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)188.2234.51
EV-to-Sales (TTM)14.265.99