Seek Returns logo

AVAV vs. PH: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AVAV and PH, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolAVAVPH
Company NameAeroVironment, Inc.Parker-Hannifin Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryAerospace & DefenseMachinery
Market Capitalization14.28 billion USD105.35 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateJanuary 23, 2007March 17, 1980
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AVAV and PH by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AVAV vs. PH: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolAVAVPH
5-Day Price Return-12.78%-1.03%
13-Week Price Return18.07%13.97%
26-Week Price Return74.80%22.63%
52-Week Price Return33.85%17.76%
Month-to-Date Return-21.28%7.65%
Year-to-Date Return89.23%30.80%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.81M0.95M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.14M0.63M
3-Month Volatility54.51%24.92%
Beta1.181.25

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

AVAV

-2.55%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
43.89%
Q3
23.64%
Median
12.98%
Q1
8.07%
Min
-2.55%

AVAV has a negative Return on Equity of -2.55%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

PH

26.98%

Machinery Industry

Max
30.85%
Q3
19.99%
Median
12.37%
Q1
8.44%
Min
-7.69%

In the upper quartile for the Machinery industry, PH’s Return on Equity of 26.98% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

AVAV vs. PH: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

AVAV

-4.14%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
14.96%
Q3
9.50%
Median
6.59%
Q1
4.45%
Min
1.01%

AVAV has a negative Net Profit Margin of -4.14%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

PH

18.18%

Machinery Industry

Max
19.28%
Q3
10.99%
Median
7.89%
Q1
5.16%
Min
-1.46%

A Net Profit Margin of 18.18% places PH in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

AVAV vs. PH: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

AVAV

-4.75%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
17.97%
Q3
12.09%
Median
9.29%
Q1
6.41%
Min
-1.59%

AVAV has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -4.75%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

PH

21.86%

Machinery Industry

Max
27.20%
Q3
15.91%
Median
11.33%
Q1
7.73%
Min
0.23%

An Operating Profit Margin of 21.86% places PH in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

AVAV vs. PH: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAVAVPH
Return on Equity (TTM)-2.55%26.98%
Return on Assets (TTM)-2.04%12.41%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-4.14%18.18%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-4.75%21.86%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)30.60%37.15%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

AVAV

5.96

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
3.37
Q3
2.01
Median
1.22
Q1
1.07
Min
0.68

AVAV’s Current Ratio of 5.96 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

PH

1.07

Machinery Industry

Max
3.27
Q3
2.16
Median
1.75
Q1
1.32
Min
0.70

PH’s Current Ratio of 1.07 falls into the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

AVAV vs. PH: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

AVAV

0.16

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
1.89
Q3
0.99
Median
0.63
Q1
0.39
Min
0.03

Falling into the lower quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry, AVAV’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.16 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

PH

0.75

Machinery Industry

Max
1.49
Q3
0.75
Median
0.45
Q1
0.23
Min
0.00

PH’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.75 is typical for the Machinery industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

AVAV vs. PH: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

AVAV

20.72

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
29.86
Q3
19.49
Median
7.09
Q1
2.62
Min
-7.63

AVAV’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 20.72 is in the upper quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

PH

16.44

Machinery Industry

Max
67.55
Q3
36.46
Median
13.55
Q1
7.73
Min
-1.43

PH’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 16.44 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Machinery industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

AVAV vs. PH: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAVAVPH
Current Ratio (MRQ)5.961.07
Quick Ratio (MRQ)4.980.57
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.160.75
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)20.7216.44

Growth

Revenue Growth

AVAV vs. PH: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

AVAV vs. PH: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

AVAV

0.00%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
2.87%
Q3
1.46%
Median
0.58%
Q1
0.10%
Min
0.00%

AVAV currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

PH

0.84%

Machinery Industry

Max
4.98%
Q3
2.83%
Median
1.89%
Q1
1.17%
Min
0.00%

PH’s Dividend Yield of 0.84% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

AVAV vs. PH: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

AVAV

0.00%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
110.40%
Q3
51.46%
Median
20.20%
Q1
4.21%
Min
0.00%

AVAV has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

PH

24.15%

Machinery Industry

Max
209.29%
Q3
102.41%
Median
62.34%
Q1
29.36%
Min
0.00%

PH’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 24.15% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

AVAV vs. PH: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAVAVPH
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.84%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%24.15%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

AVAV

--

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
94.22
Q3
53.31
Median
32.27
Q1
24.64
Min
14.57

P/E Ratio data for AVAV is currently unavailable.

PH

28.87

Machinery Industry

Max
46.28
Q3
29.52
Median
24.18
Q1
16.92
Min
7.99

PH’s P/E Ratio of 28.87 is within the middle range for the Machinery industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

AVAV vs. PH: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

AVAV

13.39

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
7.20
Q3
3.95
Median
2.35
Q1
1.71
Min
0.32

With a P/S Ratio of 13.39, AVAV trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Aerospace & Defense industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

PH

5.25

Machinery Industry

Max
5.25
Q3
2.82
Median
1.74
Q1
0.99
Min
0.27

PH’s P/S Ratio of 5.25 is in the upper echelon for the Machinery industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

AVAV vs. PH: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

AVAV

3.02

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
18.61
Q3
9.58
Median
5.45
Q1
3.11
Min
0.94

AVAV’s P/B Ratio of 3.02 is in the lower quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

PH

6.96

Machinery Industry

Max
7.18
Q3
4.18
Median
2.71
Q1
1.54
Min
0.52

PH’s P/B Ratio of 6.96 is in the upper tier for the Machinery industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

AVAV vs. PH: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAVAVPH
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--28.87
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)13.395.25
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.026.96
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)203.8631.05