Seek Returns logo

AVAL vs. BAP: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AVAL and BAP, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

BAP’s market capitalization of 18.07 billion USD is significantly greater than AVAL’s 3.45 billion USD, highlighting its more substantial market valuation.

BAP carries a higher beta at 1.02, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while AVAL (beta: 0.45) exhibits greater stability.

AVAL trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, BAP is a standard domestic listing.

SymbolAVALBAP
Company NameGrupo Aval Acciones y Valores S.A.Credicorp Ltd.
CountryCOPE
SectorFinancial ServicesFinancial Services
IndustryBanks - RegionalBanks - Regional
CEOMaria Lorena Gutierrez BoteroGianfranco Piero Dario Ferrari de Las Casas
Price2.89 USD227.25 USD
Market Cap3.45 billion USD18.07 billion USD
Beta0.451.02
ExchangeNYSENYSE
IPO DateSeptember 23, 2014October 25, 1995
ADRYesNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AVAL and BAP by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AVAL vs. BAP: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AVAL

7.35%

Banks - Regional Industry

Max
19.20%
Q3
11.87%
Median
9.48%
Q1
6.66%
Min
-0.15%

AVAL’s Return on Equity of 7.35% is on par with the norm for the Banks - Regional industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

BAP

16.95%

Banks - Regional Industry

Max
19.20%
Q3
11.87%
Median
9.48%
Q1
6.66%
Min
-0.15%

In the upper quartile for the Banks - Regional industry, BAP’s Return on Equity of 16.95% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

AVAL vs. BAP: A comparison of their ROE against the Banks - Regional industry benchmark.

Return on Invested Capital

AVAL

2.13%

Banks - Regional Industry

Max
13.33%
Q3
7.16%
Median
5.31%
Q1
2.87%
Min
-3.49%

Return on Invested Capital is often not a primary measure of capital efficiency in the Banks - Regional industry.

BAP

6.83%

Banks - Regional Industry

Max
13.33%
Q3
7.16%
Median
5.31%
Q1
2.87%
Min
-3.49%

Return on Invested Capital is often not a primary measure of capital efficiency in the Banks - Regional industry.

AVAL vs. BAP: A comparison of their ROIC against the Banks - Regional industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin

AVAL

6.65%

Banks - Regional Industry

Max
32.03%
Q3
21.35%
Median
16.99%
Q1
12.69%
Min
0.27%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Banks - Regional industry, AVAL’s Net Profit Margin of 6.65% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

BAP

23.61%

Banks - Regional Industry

Max
32.03%
Q3
21.35%
Median
16.99%
Q1
12.69%
Min
0.27%

A Net Profit Margin of 23.61% places BAP in the upper quartile for the Banks - Regional industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

AVAL vs. BAP: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against the Banks - Regional industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin

AVAL

19.48%

Banks - Regional Industry

Max
40.01%
Q3
26.24%
Median
21.14%
Q1
15.85%
Min
1.50%

AVAL’s Operating Profit Margin of 19.48% is around the midpoint for the Banks - Regional industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

BAP

37.62%

Banks - Regional Industry

Max
40.01%
Q3
26.24%
Median
21.14%
Q1
15.85%
Min
1.50%

An Operating Profit Margin of 37.62% places BAP in the upper quartile for the Banks - Regional industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

AVAL vs. BAP: A comparison of their Operating Margin against the Banks - Regional industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAVALBAP
Return on Equity (TTM)7.35%16.95%
Return on Assets (TTM)0.38%2.27%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)2.13%6.83%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)6.65%23.61%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)19.48%37.62%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)74.93%73.63%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AVAL

0.38

Banks - Regional Industry

Max
0.39
Q3
0.22
Median
0.15
Q1
0.10
Min
0.01

For the Banks - Regional industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

BAP

0.51

Banks - Regional Industry

Max
0.39
Q3
0.22
Median
0.15
Q1
0.10
Min
0.01

For the Banks - Regional industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

AVAL vs. BAP: A comparison of their Current Ratio against the Banks - Regional industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AVAL

4.00

Banks - Regional Industry

Max
1.74
Q3
0.81
Median
0.42
Q1
0.18
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 4.00, AVAL operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Banks - Regional industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

BAP

0.99

Banks - Regional Industry

Max
1.74
Q3
0.81
Median
0.42
Q1
0.18
Min
0.00

BAP’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Banks - Regional industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.99. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

AVAL vs. BAP: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against the Banks - Regional industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AVAL

0.24

Banks - Regional Industry

Max
1.58
Q3
0.84
Median
0.59
Q1
0.35
Min
-0.35

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Banks - Regional industry.

BAP

1.65

Banks - Regional Industry

Max
1.58
Q3
0.84
Median
0.59
Q1
0.35
Min
-0.35

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Banks - Regional industry.

AVAL vs. BAP: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against the Banks - Regional industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAVALBAP
Current Ratio (TTM)0.380.51
Quick Ratio (TTM)0.380.51
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)4.000.99
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.210.14
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)36.18-1.01
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)0.241.65

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AVAL and BAP. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AVAL vs. BAP: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AVAL vs. BAP: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AVAL vs. BAP: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AVAL

5.35%

Banks - Regional Industry

Max
11.72%
Q3
4.07%
Median
3.00%
Q1
1.68%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 5.35%, AVAL offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Banks - Regional industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

BAP

6.13%

Banks - Regional Industry

Max
11.72%
Q3
4.07%
Median
3.00%
Q1
1.68%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 6.13%, BAP offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Banks - Regional industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

AVAL vs. BAP: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against the Banks - Regional industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AVAL

37.46%

Banks - Regional Industry

Max
155.35%
Q3
50.05%
Median
34.14%
Q1
18.61%
Min
0.00%

AVAL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 37.46% is within the typical range for the Banks - Regional industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

BAP

15.19%

Banks - Regional Industry

Max
155.35%
Q3
50.05%
Median
34.14%
Q1
18.61%
Min
0.00%

BAP’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 15.19% is in the lower quartile for the Banks - Regional industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

AVAL vs. BAP: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against the Banks - Regional industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAVALBAP
Dividend Yield (TTM)5.35%6.13%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)37.46%15.19%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AVAL

10.86

Banks - Regional Industry

Max
22.32
Q3
15.38
Median
12.31
Q1
10.72
Min
4.30

AVAL’s P/E Ratio of 10.86 is within the middle range for the Banks - Regional industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

BAP

11.09

Banks - Regional Industry

Max
22.32
Q3
15.38
Median
12.31
Q1
10.72
Min
4.30

BAP’s P/E Ratio of 11.09 is within the middle range for the Banks - Regional industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

AVAL vs. BAP: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against the Banks - Regional industry benchmark.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AVAL

0.48

Banks - Regional Industry

Max
4.03
Q3
2.13
Median
1.25
Q1
0.71
Min
0.02

In the lower quartile for the Banks - Regional industry, AVAL’s Forward PEG Ratio of 0.48 is a positive indicator. It suggests that the stock may be attractively valued relative to its expected earnings growth.

BAP

1.20

Banks - Regional Industry

Max
4.03
Q3
2.13
Median
1.25
Q1
0.71
Min
0.02

BAP’s Forward PEG Ratio of 1.20 is within the middle range of its peers in the Banks - Regional industry. This suggests a reasonable balance between the stock’s price and its expected growth, aligning with sector valuation norms.

AVAL vs. BAP: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against the Banks - Regional industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AVAL

0.73

Banks - Regional Industry

Max
4.28
Q3
2.76
Median
2.17
Q1
1.71
Min
0.55

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Banks - Regional industry.

BAP

2.62

Banks - Regional Industry

Max
4.28
Q3
2.76
Median
2.17
Q1
1.71
Min
0.55

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Banks - Regional industry.

AVAL vs. BAP: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against the Banks - Regional industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AVAL

0.80

Banks - Regional Industry

Max
1.99
Q3
1.35
Median
1.09
Q1
0.92
Min
0.33

AVAL’s P/B Ratio of 0.80 is in the lower quartile for the Banks - Regional industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

BAP

1.78

Banks - Regional Industry

Max
1.99
Q3
1.35
Median
1.09
Q1
0.92
Min
0.33

BAP’s P/B Ratio of 1.78 is in the upper tier for the Banks - Regional industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

AVAL vs. BAP: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against the Banks - Regional industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAVALBAP
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)10.8611.09
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)0.481.20
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)0.732.62
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)0.801.78
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)-1.34-17.36
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)46.256.10
EV-to-Sales (TTM)3.342.25