Seek Returns logo

AUR vs. TSM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AUR and TSM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

TSM’s market capitalization of 1,217.79 billion USD is significantly greater than AUR’s 9.37 billion USD, highlighting its more substantial market valuation.

AUR’s beta of 2.60 points to significantly higher volatility compared to TSM (beta: 1.34), suggesting AUR has greater potential for both gains and losses relative to market movements.

TSM is an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), allowing U.S. investors direct exposure to its non-U.S. operations. AUR, on the other hand, is a domestic entity.

SymbolAURTSM
Company NameAurora Innovation, Inc.Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited
CountryUSTW
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustryInformation Technology ServicesSemiconductors
CEOChristopher UrmsonC. C. Wei
Price5.3 USD234.8 USD
Market Cap9.37 billion USD1,217.79 billion USD
Beta2.601.34
ExchangeNASDAQNYSE
IPO DateMay 10, 2021October 9, 1997
ADRNoYes

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AUR and TSM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AUR vs. TSM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AUR

-42.79%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
47.24%
Q3
23.27%
Median
12.85%
Q1
2.22%
Min
-26.63%

AUR has a negative Return on Equity of -42.79%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

TSM

31.41%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
41.84%
Q3
15.81%
Median
6.31%
Q1
-5.54%
Min
-30.12%

In the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry, TSM’s Return on Equity of 31.41% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

AUR vs. TSM: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Information Technology Services and Semiconductors industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AUR

-40.98%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
28.29%
Q3
13.19%
Median
7.24%
Q1
0.23%
Min
-18.82%

AUR has a negative Return on Invested Capital of -40.98%. This indicates that its operations are failing to generate a profit on the total capital invested, signaling significant inefficiency or value destruction.

TSM

21.11%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
30.91%
Q3
11.34%
Median
4.08%
Q1
-2.17%
Min
-19.59%

In the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry, TSM’s Return on Invested Capital of 21.11% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

AUR vs. TSM: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Information Technology Services and Semiconductors industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AUR

--

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
20.47%
Q3
11.62%
Median
5.97%
Q1
1.89%
Min
-4.62%

Net Profit Margin data for AUR is currently unavailable.

TSM

41.69%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
51.69%
Q3
19.67%
Median
8.56%
Q1
-5.44%
Min
-38.60%

A Net Profit Margin of 41.69% places TSM in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

AUR vs. TSM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Information Technology Services and Semiconductors industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AUR

--

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
29.42%
Q3
14.75%
Median
8.92%
Q1
2.62%
Min
-11.92%

Operating Profit Margin data for AUR is currently unavailable.

TSM

47.12%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
58.03%
Q3
22.12%
Median
8.40%
Q1
-3.73%
Min
-36.14%

An Operating Profit Margin of 47.12% places TSM in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

AUR vs. TSM: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Information Technology Services and Semiconductors industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAURTSM
Return on Equity (TTM)-42.79%31.41%
Return on Assets (TTM)-38.19%18.36%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)-40.98%21.11%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)--41.69%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)--47.12%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)--57.41%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AUR

9.54

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
3.41
Q3
2.37
Median
1.58
Q1
1.20
Min
0.00

AUR’s Current Ratio of 9.54 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Information Technology Services industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

TSM

2.39

Semiconductors Industry

Max
9.10
Q3
5.23
Median
3.09
Q1
2.49
Min
1.02

TSM’s Current Ratio of 2.39 falls into the lower quartile for the Semiconductors industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

AUR vs. TSM: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Information Technology Services and Semiconductors industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AUR

0.06

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
2.63
Q3
1.16
Median
0.48
Q1
0.09
Min
0.01

Falling into the lower quartile for the Information Technology Services industry, AUR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.06 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

TSM

0.21

Semiconductors Industry

Max
0.97
Q3
0.46
Median
0.21
Q1
0.05
Min
0.00

TSM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.21 is typical for the Semiconductors industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

AUR vs. TSM: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Information Technology Services and Semiconductors industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AUR

--

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
17.52
Q3
10.04
Median
4.66
Q1
0.80
Min
-10.50

Interest Coverage Ratio data for AUR is currently unavailable.

TSM

280.65

Semiconductors Industry

Max
36.25
Q3
29.12
Median
7.01
Q1
-1.22
Min
-18.18

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 280.65, TSM demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Semiconductors industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

AUR vs. TSM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Information Technology Services and Semiconductors industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAURTSM
Current Ratio (TTM)9.542.39
Quick Ratio (TTM)9.542.18
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.060.21
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.060.14
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)0.07-0.78
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)--280.65

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AUR and TSM. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AUR vs. TSM: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AUR vs. TSM: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AUR vs. TSM: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AUR

0.00%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
16.57%
Q3
1.39%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AUR currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

TSM

1.57%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
6.48%
Q3
0.93%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 1.57%, TSM offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Semiconductors industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

AUR vs. TSM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Information Technology Services and Semiconductors industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AUR

0.00%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
112.81%
Q3
20.98%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AUR has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

TSM

29.71%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
204.29%
Q3
31.85%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TSM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 29.71% is within the typical range for the Semiconductors industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

AUR vs. TSM: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Information Technology Services and Semiconductors industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAURTSM
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%1.57%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%29.71%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AUR

-11.69

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
49.12
Q3
36.91
Median
24.84
Q1
15.88
Min
1.55

AUR has a negative P/E Ratio of -11.69. This occurs when a company has negative earnings (a net loss), making the ratio unsuitable for valuation analysis.

TSM

21.49

Semiconductors Industry

Max
86.15
Q3
47.38
Median
27.87
Q1
18.89
Min
4.73

TSM’s P/E Ratio of 21.49 is within the middle range for the Semiconductors industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

AUR vs. TSM: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Information Technology Services and Semiconductors industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AUR

0.45

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
5.35
Q3
3.79
Median
2.23
Q1
1.19
Min
0.03

In the lower quartile for the Information Technology Services industry, AUR’s Forward PEG Ratio of 0.45 is a positive indicator. It suggests that the stock may be attractively valued relative to its expected earnings growth.

TSM

1.19

Semiconductors Industry

Max
4.73
Q3
2.80
Median
1.11
Q1
0.68
Min
0.01

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Semiconductors industry.

AUR vs. TSM: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Information Technology Services and Semiconductors industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AUR

--

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
8.15
Q3
4.17
Median
2.14
Q1
1.00
Min
0.10

P/S Ratio data for AUR is currently unavailable.

TSM

8.96

Semiconductors Industry

Max
21.96
Q3
10.21
Median
4.45
Q1
2.32
Min
0.48

TSM’s P/S Ratio of 8.96 aligns with the market consensus for the Semiconductors industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

AUR vs. TSM: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Information Technology Services and Semiconductors industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AUR

5.18

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
11.78
Q3
6.14
Median
3.23
Q1
1.97
Min
0.42

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Information Technology Services industry.

TSM

6.12

Semiconductors Industry

Max
13.12
Q3
6.49
Median
3.31
Q1
1.74
Min
0.23

TSM’s P/B Ratio of 6.12 is within the conventional range for the Semiconductors industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

AUR vs. TSM: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Information Technology Services and Semiconductors industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAURTSM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)-11.6921.49
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)0.451.19
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)--8.96
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)5.186.12
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)-14.7030.50
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)-11.8212.03
EV-to-Sales (TTM)--8.41