AUR vs. RBLX: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AUR and RBLX, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength.
Company Overview
RBLX’s market capitalization of 63.89 billion USD is significantly greater than AUR’s 9.99 billion USD, highlighting its more substantial market valuation.
AUR’s beta of 2.60 points to significantly higher volatility compared to RBLX (beta: 1.56), suggesting AUR has greater potential for both gains and losses relative to market movements.
Symbol | AUR | RBLX |
---|---|---|
Company Name | Aurora Innovation, Inc. | Roblox Corporation |
Country | US | US |
Sector | Technology | Technology |
Industry | Information Technology Services | Electronic Gaming & Multimedia |
CEO | Mr. Christopher Urmson Ph.D. | Mr. David Baszucki |
Price | 5.65 USD | 94.2 USD |
Market Cap | 9.99 billion USD | 63.89 billion USD |
Beta | 2.60 | 1.56 |
Exchange | NASDAQ | NYSE |
IPO Date | May 10, 2021 | March 10, 2021 |
ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AUR and RBLX over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
This section compares the market valuation of AUR and RBLX. Key takeaways regarding their valuation, when viewed within their industry context, are presented in the commentary that follows.
- AUR’s Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratio of -12.46 and RBLX’s P/E ratio of -71.91 both indicate negative earnings. For AUR, this signifies current unprofitability, raising questions about its operational efficiency or market conditions. RBLX’s negative P/E also reflects a lack of current earnings, a key concern for its financial health and investor appeal.
Symbol | AUR | RBLX |
---|---|---|
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | -12.46 | -71.91 |
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 0.48 | 1.56 |
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | -- | 16.66 |
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 5.52 | 203.65 |
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | -12.61 | -105.02 |
EV-to-Sales (TTM) | -- | 16.83 |
Dividend Comparison
Neither AUR nor RBLX currently pays a dividend; this often suggests they are reinvesting earnings for growth, prioritizing long-term expansion over immediate cash returns to shareholders.
Symbol | AUR | RBLX |
---|---|---|
Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section evaluates the financial strength of AUR and RBLX. Noteworthy observations on their financial resilience, considered from an industry perspective, are detailed in the points that follow.
- RBLX’s Debt-to-Equity (D/E) ratio of 5.81 is very high. This signals a considerable debt load relative to equity, potentially heightening its risk during economic downturns or if interest rates rise, and may affect its financial resilience.
Symbol | AUR | RBLX |
---|---|---|
Current Ratio (TTM) | 9.54 | 1.02 |
Quick Ratio (TTM) | 9.54 | 1.02 |
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.06 | 5.81 |
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM) | 0.06 | 0.24 |
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM) | 0.07 | -1.05 |
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | -25.09 |