Seek Returns logo

AUR vs. QBTS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AUR and QBTS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

AUR’s market capitalization of 9.37 billion USD is substantially larger than QBTS’s 5.19 billion USD, indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.

AUR’s beta of 2.60 points to significantly higher volatility compared to QBTS (beta: 1.48), suggesting AUR has greater potential for both gains and losses relative to market movements.

SymbolAURQBTS
Company NameAurora Innovation, Inc.D-Wave Quantum Inc.
CountryUSCA
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustryInformation Technology ServicesComputer Hardware
CEOChristopher UrmsonAlan E. Baratz
Price5.3 USD16.79 USD
Market Cap9.37 billion USD5.19 billion USD
Beta2.601.48
ExchangeNASDAQNYSE
IPO DateMay 10, 2021December 11, 2020
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AUR and QBTS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AUR vs. QBTS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AUR

-42.79%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
47.24%
Q3
23.27%
Median
12.85%
Q1
2.22%
Min
-26.63%

AUR has a negative Return on Equity of -42.79%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

QBTS

-227.95%

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
123.03%
Q3
15.78%
Median
-13.44%
Q1
-119.16%
Min
-227.95%

QBTS has a negative Return on Equity of -227.95%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

AUR vs. QBTS: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Information Technology Services and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AUR

-40.98%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
28.29%
Q3
13.19%
Median
7.24%
Q1
0.23%
Min
-18.82%

AUR has a negative Return on Invested Capital of -40.98%. This indicates that its operations are failing to generate a profit on the total capital invested, signaling significant inefficiency or value destruction.

QBTS

-22.72%

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
30.37%
Q3
20.44%
Median
7.03%
Q1
-12.47%
Min
-31.70%

QBTS has a negative Return on Invested Capital of -22.72%. This indicates that its operations are failing to generate a profit on the total capital invested, signaling significant inefficiency or value destruction.

AUR vs. QBTS: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Information Technology Services and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AUR

--

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
20.47%
Q3
11.62%
Median
5.97%
Q1
1.89%
Min
-4.62%

Net Profit Margin data for AUR is currently unavailable.

QBTS

-617.83%

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
40.72%
Q3
10.87%
Median
4.33%
Q1
-378.64%
Min
-753.20%

QBTS has a negative Net Profit Margin of -617.83%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

AUR vs. QBTS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Information Technology Services and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AUR

--

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
29.42%
Q3
14.75%
Median
8.92%
Q1
2.62%
Min
-11.92%

Operating Profit Margin data for AUR is currently unavailable.

QBTS

-332.34%

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
42.27%
Q3
13.53%
Median
4.56%
Q1
-295.01%
Min
-592.84%

QBTS has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -332.34%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

AUR vs. QBTS: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Information Technology Services and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAURQBTS
Return on Equity (TTM)-42.79%-227.95%
Return on Assets (TTM)-38.19%-40.54%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)-40.98%-22.72%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)---617.83%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)---332.34%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)--83.23%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AUR

9.54

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
3.41
Q3
2.37
Median
1.58
Q1
1.20
Min
0.00

AUR’s Current Ratio of 9.54 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Information Technology Services industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

QBTS

20.73

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
20.73
Q3
11.54
Median
2.69
Q1
1.40
Min
0.73

QBTS’s Current Ratio of 20.73 is in the upper quartile for the Computer Hardware industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

AUR vs. QBTS: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Information Technology Services and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AUR

0.06

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
2.63
Q3
1.16
Median
0.48
Q1
0.09
Min
0.01

Falling into the lower quartile for the Information Technology Services industry, AUR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.06 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

QBTS

0.04

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
1.36
Q3
0.67
Median
0.04
Q1
0.03
Min
0.00

QBTS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.04 is typical for the Computer Hardware industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

AUR vs. QBTS: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Information Technology Services and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AUR

--

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
17.52
Q3
10.04
Median
4.66
Q1
0.80
Min
-10.50

Interest Coverage Ratio data for AUR is currently unavailable.

QBTS

-28.05

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
32.50
Q3
21.85
Median
4.98
Q1
-7.71
Min
-34.24

QBTS has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -28.05. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

AUR vs. QBTS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Information Technology Services and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAURQBTS
Current Ratio (TTM)9.5420.73
Quick Ratio (TTM)9.5420.61
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.060.04
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.060.02
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)0.072.22
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)---28.05

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AUR and QBTS. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AUR vs. QBTS: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AUR vs. QBTS: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AUR vs. QBTS: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AUR

0.00%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
16.57%
Q3
1.39%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AUR currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

QBTS

0.00%

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
9.24%
Q3
1.58%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

QBTS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

AUR vs. QBTS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Information Technology Services and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AUR

0.00%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
112.81%
Q3
20.98%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AUR has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

QBTS

0.00%

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
193.79%
Q3
30.72%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

QBTS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

AUR vs. QBTS: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Information Technology Services and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAURQBTS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AUR

-11.69

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
49.12
Q3
36.91
Median
24.84
Q1
15.88
Min
1.55

AUR has a negative P/E Ratio of -11.69. This occurs when a company has negative earnings (a net loss), making the ratio unsuitable for valuation analysis.

QBTS

-36.44

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
24.60
Q3
24.01
Median
20.31
Q1
18.24
Min
13.38

QBTS has a negative P/E Ratio of -36.44. This occurs when a company has negative earnings (a net loss), making the ratio unsuitable for valuation analysis.

AUR vs. QBTS: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Information Technology Services and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AUR

0.45

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
5.35
Q3
3.79
Median
2.23
Q1
1.19
Min
0.03

In the lower quartile for the Information Technology Services industry, AUR’s Forward PEG Ratio of 0.45 is a positive indicator. It suggests that the stock may be attractively valued relative to its expected earnings growth.

QBTS

1.37

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
9.77
Q3
5.18
Median
1.77
Q1
1.17
Min
0.02

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Computer Hardware industry.

AUR vs. QBTS: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Information Technology Services and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AUR

--

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
8.15
Q3
4.17
Median
2.14
Q1
1.00
Min
0.10

P/S Ratio data for AUR is currently unavailable.

QBTS

242.82

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
57.61
Q3
47.40
Median
3.37
Q1
1.56
Min
0.43

With a P/S Ratio of 242.82, QBTS trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Computer Hardware industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

AUR vs. QBTS: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Information Technology Services and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AUR

5.18

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
11.78
Q3
6.14
Median
3.23
Q1
1.97
Min
0.42

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Information Technology Services industry.

QBTS

23.19

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
21.21
Q3
14.71
Median
9.28
Q1
3.74
Min
0.43

At 23.19, QBTS’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Computer Hardware industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

AUR vs. QBTS: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Information Technology Services and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAURQBTS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)-11.69-36.44
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)0.451.37
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)--242.82
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)5.1823.19
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)-14.70-99.42
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)-11.82-36.61
EV-to-Sales (TTM)--228.95