AUR vs. QBTS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AUR and QBTS, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
AUR dominates in value with a market cap of 10.72 billion USD, eclipsing QBTS’s 4.43 billion USD by roughly 2.42×.
AUR’s beta of 2.77 points to much larger expected swings compared to QBTS’s calmer 0.89, suggesting both higher upside and downside potential.
| Symbol | AUR | QBTS |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Aurora Innovation, Inc. | D-Wave Quantum Inc. |
| Country | US | CA |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Information Technology Services | Computer Hardware |
| CEO | Mr. Christopher Urmson Ph.D. | Dr. Alan E. Baratz Ph.D. |
| Price | 6.06 USD | 15.36 USD |
| Market Cap | 10.72 billion USD | 4.43 billion USD |
| Beta | 2.77 | 0.89 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NYSE |
| IPO Date | May 10, 2021 | December 11, 2020 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AUR and QBTS over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of AUR and QBTS based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- Neither AUR nor QBTS turned a profit—both carry negative P/E ratios of -13.36 and -33.33, underscoring continued losses that pressure their valuations.
- AUR and QBTS both consumed more free cash flow than they generated last year—P/FCF of -16.83 and -84.98, respectively—highlighting persistent liquidity pressure.
| Symbol | AUR | QBTS |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | -13.36 | -33.33 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 0.51 | 1.25 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 0.00 | 207.56 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 5.92 | 21.21 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | -16.83 | -84.98 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | -13.53 | -30.97 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 0.00 | 193.69 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | -16.74 | -79.30 |
Dividend Comparison
Neither AUR nor QBTS currently pays a dividend yield; this often indicates they are reinvesting earnings for growth, prioritizing long-term expansion over immediate cash returns to shareholders.
| Symbol | AUR | QBTS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AUR and QBTS, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- AUR shows “--” (minimal interest expense), but QBTS is in the red with interest coverage -28.05, signaling a net operating loss.
| Symbol | AUR | QBTS |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 9.54 | 20.73 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 9.54 | 20.61 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.06 | 0.04 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.06 | 0.02 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | -28.05 |