AUR vs. PANW: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AUR and PANW, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength.
Company Overview
PANW’s market capitalization of 130.87 billion USD is significantly greater than AUR’s 9.66 billion USD, highlighting its more substantial market valuation.
AUR’s beta of 2.60 points to significantly higher volatility compared to PANW (beta: 0.97), suggesting AUR has greater potential for both gains and losses relative to market movements.
Symbol | AUR | PANW |
---|---|---|
Company Name | Aurora Innovation, Inc. | Palo Alto Networks, Inc. |
Country | US | US |
Sector | Technology | Technology |
Industry | Information Technology Services | Software - Infrastructure |
CEO | Mr. Christopher Urmson Ph.D. | Mr. Nikesh Arora C.F.A. |
Price | 5.46 USD | 196.27 USD |
Market Cap | 9.66 billion USD | 130.87 billion USD |
Beta | 2.60 | 0.97 |
Exchange | NASDAQ | NASDAQ |
IPO Date | May 10, 2021 | July 20, 2012 |
ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AUR and PANW over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
This section compares the market valuation of AUR and PANW. Key takeaways regarding their valuation, when viewed within their industry context, are presented in the commentary that follows.
- AUR’s Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratio of -12.04 indicates negative earnings, signaling current unprofitability. PANW, with a very high P/E ratio of 105.46, appears to have a valuation that either is significantly stretched or reflects high expectations for substantial future growth.
- PANW’s Forward PEG ratio of -1.05 is negative. Such a figure commonly arises from negative earnings or forecasts of diminishing profitability, making standard valuation comparisons based on growth particularly challenging.
Symbol | AUR | PANW |
---|---|---|
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | -12.04 | 105.46 |
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 0.46 | -1.05 |
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | -- | 14.75 |
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 5.33 | 18.05 |
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | -12.19 | 77.85 |
EV-to-Sales (TTM) | -- | 14.57 |
Dividend Comparison
Neither AUR nor PANW currently pays a dividend; this often suggests they are reinvesting earnings for growth, prioritizing long-term expansion over immediate cash returns to shareholders.
Symbol | AUR | PANW |
---|---|---|
Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
Explore the financial strength details for AUR and PANW in the table below.
Symbol | AUR | PANW |
---|---|---|
Current Ratio (TTM) | 9.54 | 0.90 |
Quick Ratio (TTM) | 9.54 | 0.90 |
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.06 | 0.11 |
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM) | 0.06 | 0.04 |
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM) | 0.07 | -0.95 |
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | 378.50 |