AUR vs. OKTA: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AUR and OKTA, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
OKTA stands out with 20.40 billion USD in market value—about 1.90× AUR’s market cap of 10.72 billion USD.
AUR’s beta of 2.77 points to much larger expected swings compared to OKTA’s calmer 0.96, suggesting both higher upside and downside potential.
| Symbol | AUR | OKTA |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Aurora Innovation, Inc. | Okta, Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Information Technology Services | Software - Infrastructure |
| CEO | Mr. Christopher Urmson Ph.D. | Mr. Todd McKinnon |
| Price | 6.06 USD | 122.06 USD |
| Market Cap | 10.72 billion USD | 20.40 billion USD |
| Beta | 2.77 | 0.96 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NASDAQ |
| IPO Date | May 10, 2021 | April 7, 2017 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AUR and OKTA over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of AUR and OKTA based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- AUR has a negative P/E (-13.36) due to recent losses. In contrast, OKTA commands a premium multiple of 749.52, signaling strong market confidence in its future earnings growth to justify this high valuation.
- AUR has a negative Price-to-Free Cash Flow ratio of -16.83, signaling it consumed more cash than it produced over the last year—an important liquidity warning. In contrast, OKTA (P/FCF 27.80) indicates positive free cash flow generation.
| Symbol | AUR | OKTA |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | -13.36 | 749.52 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 0.51 | 86.90 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 0.00 | 7.82 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 5.92 | 3.28 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | -16.83 | 27.80 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | -13.53 | 337.85 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 0.00 | 8.03 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | -16.74 | 28.54 |
Dividend Comparison
Neither AUR nor OKTA currently pays a dividend yield; this often indicates they are reinvesting earnings for growth, prioritizing long-term expansion over immediate cash returns to shareholders.
| Symbol | AUR | OKTA |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AUR and OKTA, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- AUR shows “--” (minimal interest expense), but OKTA is in the red with interest coverage -37.00, signaling a net operating loss.
| Symbol | AUR | OKTA |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 9.54 | 1.35 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 9.54 | 1.35 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.06 | 0.15 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.06 | 0.10 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | -37.00 |