AUR vs. MSTR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AUR and MSTR, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
MSTR stands out with 110.10 billion USD in market value—about 10.27× AUR’s market cap of 10.72 billion USD.
With betas of 2.77 for AUR and 3.81 for MSTR, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.
| Symbol | AUR | MSTR |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Aurora Innovation, Inc. | MicroStrategy Incorporated |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Information Technology Services | Software - Application |
| CEO | Mr. Christopher Urmson Ph.D. | Mr. Phong Q. Le |
| Price | 6.06 USD | 402.69 USD |
| Market Cap | 10.72 billion USD | 110.10 billion USD |
| Beta | 2.77 | 3.81 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NASDAQ |
| IPO Date | May 10, 2021 | June 11, 1998 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AUR and MSTR over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of AUR and MSTR based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- Neither AUR nor MSTR turned a profit—both carry negative P/E ratios of -13.36 and -19.34, underscoring continued losses that pressure their valuations.
- AUR and MSTR both consumed more free cash flow than they generated last year—P/FCF of -16.83 and -5.36, respectively—highlighting persistent liquidity pressure.
| Symbol | AUR | MSTR |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | -13.36 | -19.34 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 0.51 | 0.07 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 0.00 | 239.72 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 5.92 | 79.17 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | -16.83 | -5.36 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | -13.53 | -14.54 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 0.00 | 239.82 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | -16.74 | -5.37 |
Dividend Comparison
Neither AUR nor MSTR currently pays a dividend yield; this often indicates they are reinvesting earnings for growth, prioritizing long-term expansion over immediate cash returns to shareholders.
| Symbol | AUR | MSTR |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AUR and MSTR, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- MSTR’s current ratio of 0.66 indicates its assets may not cover near-term debts, whereas AUR at 9.54 maintains healthy liquidity.
- MSTR posts a quick ratio of 0.66, indicating limited coverage of short-term debts from its most liquid assets—while AUR at 9.54 enjoys stronger liquidity resilience.
- AUR shows “--” (minimal interest expense), but MSTR is in the red with interest coverage -229.74, signaling a net operating loss.
| Symbol | AUR | MSTR |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 9.54 | 0.66 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 9.54 | 0.66 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.06 | 0.08 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.06 | 0.00 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | -229.74 |