Seek Returns logo

AUR vs. MSI: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AUR and MSI, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

MSI’s market capitalization of 70.91 billion USD is significantly greater than AUR’s 9.37 billion USD, highlighting its more substantial market valuation.

AUR’s beta of 2.60 points to significantly higher volatility compared to MSI (beta: 0.97), suggesting AUR has greater potential for both gains and losses relative to market movements.

SymbolAURMSI
Company NameAurora Innovation, Inc.Motorola Solutions, Inc.
CountryUSUS
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustryInformation Technology ServicesCommunication Equipment
CEOChristopher UrmsonGregory Q. Brown
Price5.3 USD424.84 USD
Market Cap9.37 billion USD70.91 billion USD
Beta2.600.97
ExchangeNASDAQNYSE
IPO DateMay 10, 2021March 17, 1980
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AUR and MSI by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AUR vs. MSI: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AUR

-42.79%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
47.24%
Q3
23.27%
Median
12.85%
Q1
2.22%
Min
-26.63%

AUR has a negative Return on Equity of -42.79%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

MSI

149.56%

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
30.07%
Q3
8.07%
Median
1.84%
Q1
-11.93%
Min
-31.65%

MSI’s Return on Equity of 149.56% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Communication Equipment industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

AUR vs. MSI: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Information Technology Services and Communication Equipment industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AUR

-40.98%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
28.29%
Q3
13.19%
Median
7.24%
Q1
0.23%
Min
-18.82%

AUR has a negative Return on Invested Capital of -40.98%. This indicates that its operations are failing to generate a profit on the total capital invested, signaling significant inefficiency or value destruction.

MSI

22.82%

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
11.59%
Q3
6.61%
Median
2.97%
Q1
-2.58%
Min
-13.18%

MSI’s Return on Invested Capital of 22.82% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Communication Equipment industry. This demonstrates an outstanding ability to deploy capital efficiently and create significant value.

AUR vs. MSI: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Information Technology Services and Communication Equipment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AUR

--

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
20.47%
Q3
11.62%
Median
5.97%
Q1
1.89%
Min
-4.62%

Net Profit Margin data for AUR is currently unavailable.

MSI

18.67%

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
23.65%
Q3
9.21%
Median
2.46%
Q1
-8.56%
Min
-29.87%

A Net Profit Margin of 18.67% places MSI in the upper quartile for the Communication Equipment industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

AUR vs. MSI: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Information Technology Services and Communication Equipment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AUR

--

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
29.42%
Q3
14.75%
Median
8.92%
Q1
2.62%
Min
-11.92%

Operating Profit Margin data for AUR is currently unavailable.

MSI

25.20%

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
30.72%
Q3
11.64%
Median
5.79%
Q1
-2.28%
Min
-18.20%

An Operating Profit Margin of 25.20% places MSI in the upper quartile for the Communication Equipment industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

AUR vs. MSI: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Information Technology Services and Communication Equipment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAURMSI
Return on Equity (TTM)-42.79%149.56%
Return on Assets (TTM)-38.19%14.18%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)-40.98%22.82%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)--18.67%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)--25.20%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)--50.97%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AUR

9.54

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
3.41
Q3
2.37
Median
1.58
Q1
1.20
Min
0.00

AUR’s Current Ratio of 9.54 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Information Technology Services industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

MSI

1.20

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
3.40
Q3
2.59
Median
1.62
Q1
1.32
Min
0.86

MSI’s Current Ratio of 1.20 falls into the lower quartile for the Communication Equipment industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

AUR vs. MSI: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Information Technology Services and Communication Equipment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AUR

0.06

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
2.63
Q3
1.16
Median
0.48
Q1
0.09
Min
0.01

Falling into the lower quartile for the Information Technology Services industry, AUR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.06 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

MSI

3.98

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
1.82
Q3
1.00
Median
0.53
Q1
0.20
Min
0.02

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.98, MSI operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Communication Equipment industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

AUR vs. MSI: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Information Technology Services and Communication Equipment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AUR

--

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
17.52
Q3
10.04
Median
4.66
Q1
0.80
Min
-10.50

Interest Coverage Ratio data for AUR is currently unavailable.

MSI

11.80

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
16.12
Q3
9.22
Median
2.52
Q1
-0.75
Min
-12.07

MSI’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 11.80 is in the upper quartile for the Communication Equipment industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

AUR vs. MSI: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Information Technology Services and Communication Equipment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAURMSI
Current Ratio (TTM)9.541.20
Quick Ratio (TTM)9.541.03
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.063.98
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.060.45
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)0.071.57
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)--11.80

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AUR and MSI. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AUR vs. MSI: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AUR vs. MSI: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AUR vs. MSI: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AUR

0.00%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
16.57%
Q3
1.39%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AUR currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

MSI

1.00%

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
4.72%
Q3
0.38%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 1.00%, MSI offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Communication Equipment industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

AUR vs. MSI: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Information Technology Services and Communication Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AUR

0.00%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
112.81%
Q3
20.98%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AUR has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

MSI

32.89%

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
91.96%
Q3
26.44%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MSI’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 32.89% is in the upper quartile for the Communication Equipment industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

AUR vs. MSI: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Information Technology Services and Communication Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAURMSI
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%1.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%32.89%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AUR

-11.69

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
49.12
Q3
36.91
Median
24.84
Q1
15.88
Min
1.55

AUR has a negative P/E Ratio of -11.69. This occurs when a company has negative earnings (a net loss), making the ratio unsuitable for valuation analysis.

MSI

34.66

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
44.37
Q3
41.98
Median
30.61
Q1
23.44
Min
2.14

MSI’s P/E Ratio of 34.66 is within the middle range for the Communication Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

AUR vs. MSI: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Information Technology Services and Communication Equipment industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AUR

0.45

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
5.35
Q3
3.79
Median
2.23
Q1
1.19
Min
0.03

In the lower quartile for the Information Technology Services industry, AUR’s Forward PEG Ratio of 0.45 is a positive indicator. It suggests that the stock may be attractively valued relative to its expected earnings growth.

MSI

4.11

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
15.97
Q3
6.99
Median
2.78
Q1
0.66
Min
0.05

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Communication Equipment industry.

AUR vs. MSI: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Information Technology Services and Communication Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AUR

--

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
8.15
Q3
4.17
Median
2.14
Q1
1.00
Min
0.10

P/S Ratio data for AUR is currently unavailable.

MSI

6.47

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
6.38
Q3
3.88
Median
2.17
Q1
1.15
Min
0.37

With a P/S Ratio of 6.47, MSI trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Communication Equipment industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

AUR vs. MSI: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Information Technology Services and Communication Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AUR

5.18

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
11.78
Q3
6.14
Median
3.23
Q1
1.97
Min
0.42

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Information Technology Services industry.

MSI

43.21

Communication Equipment Industry

Max
14.42
Q3
7.01
Median
3.09
Q1
1.38
Min
0.41

At 43.21, MSI’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Communication Equipment industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

AUR vs. MSI: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Information Technology Services and Communication Equipment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAURMSI
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)-11.6934.66
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)0.454.11
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)--6.47
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)5.1843.21
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)-14.7031.23
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)-11.8224.03
EV-to-Sales (TTM)--6.92