AUR vs. MRVL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AUR and MRVL, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
MRVL stands out with 51.92 billion USD in market value—about 4.84× AUR’s market cap of 10.72 billion USD.
AUR’s beta of 2.77 points to much larger expected swings compared to MRVL’s calmer 1.82, suggesting both higher upside and downside potential.
| Symbol | AUR | MRVL |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Aurora Innovation, Inc. | Marvell Technology, Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Information Technology Services | Semiconductors |
| CEO | Mr. Christopher Urmson Ph.D. | Mr. Matthew J. Murphy |
| Price | 6.06 USD | 60.11 USD |
| Market Cap | 10.72 billion USD | 51.92 billion USD |
| Beta | 2.77 | 1.82 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NASDAQ |
| IPO Date | May 10, 2021 | June 30, 2000 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AUR and MRVL over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of AUR and MRVL based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- Neither AUR nor MRVL turned a profit—both carry negative P/E ratios of -13.36 and -58.80, underscoring continued losses that pressure their valuations.
- MRVL shows a negative forward PEG of -2.32, signaling expected earnings contraction, while AUR at 0.51 maintains analysts’ projections for stable or improved profits.
- AUR has a negative Price-to-Free Cash Flow ratio of -16.83, signaling it consumed more cash than it produced over the last year—an important liquidity warning. In contrast, MRVL (P/FCF 37.35) indicates positive free cash flow generation.
| Symbol | AUR | MRVL |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | -13.36 | -58.80 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 0.51 | -2.32 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 0.00 | 9.00 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 5.92 | 3.88 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | -16.83 | 37.35 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | -13.53 | -2221.67 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 0.00 | 9.59 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | -16.74 | 39.79 |
Dividend Comparison
AUR offers a 0% dividend yield, suggesting it may be reinvesting available cash back into the business for future growth, while MRVL provides a 0.40% dividend yield, giving investors a steady income stream.
| Symbol | AUR | MRVL |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.40% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AUR and MRVL, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- AUR shows “--” (minimal interest expense), but MRVL is in the red with interest coverage -3.75, signaling a net operating loss.
| Symbol | AUR | MRVL |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 9.54 | 1.54 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 9.54 | 1.03 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.06 | 0.32 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.06 | 0.21 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | -3.75 |