AUR vs. IONQ: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AUR and IONQ, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
With AUR at 10.72 billion USD and IONQ at 8.31 billion USD, their market capitalizations sit in the same ballpark.
With betas of 2.77 for AUR and 2.46 for IONQ, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.
| Symbol | AUR | IONQ |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Aurora Innovation, Inc. | IonQ, Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Information Technology Services | Computer Hardware |
| CEO | Mr. Christopher Urmson Ph.D. | Mr. Niccolo Mcleod de Masi |
| Price | 6.06 USD | 33.54 USD |
| Market Cap | 10.72 billion USD | 8.31 billion USD |
| Beta | 2.77 | 2.46 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NYSE |
| IPO Date | May 10, 2021 | January 4, 2021 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AUR and IONQ over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of AUR and IONQ based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- Neither AUR nor IONQ turned a profit—both carry negative P/E ratios of -13.36 and -23.66, underscoring continued losses that pressure their valuations.
- AUR and IONQ both consumed more free cash flow than they generated last year—P/FCF of -16.83 and -42.42, respectively—highlighting persistent liquidity pressure.
| Symbol | AUR | IONQ |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | -13.36 | -23.66 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 0.51 | 8.08 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 0.00 | 193.01 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 5.92 | 10.03 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | -16.83 | -42.42 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | -13.53 | -34.91 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 0.00 | 189.71 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | -16.74 | -41.70 |
Dividend Comparison
Neither AUR nor IONQ currently pays a dividend yield; this often indicates they are reinvesting earnings for growth, prioritizing long-term expansion over immediate cash returns to shareholders.
| Symbol | AUR | IONQ |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AUR and IONQ, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- Neither AUR nor IONQ records interest coverage (both “--”), indicating virtually no interest expense—usually a sign of negligible debt.
| Symbol | AUR | IONQ |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 9.54 | 13.17 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 9.54 | 12.67 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.06 | 0.02 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.06 | 0.02 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | -- |