Seek Returns logo

AUR vs. IBM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AUR and IBM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

IBM’s market capitalization of 271.36 billion USD is significantly greater than AUR’s 9.37 billion USD, highlighting its more substantial market valuation.

AUR’s beta of 2.60 points to significantly higher volatility compared to IBM (beta: 0.65), suggesting AUR has greater potential for both gains and losses relative to market movements.

SymbolAURIBM
Company NameAurora Innovation, Inc.International Business Machines Corporation
CountryUSUS
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustryInformation Technology ServicesInformation Technology Services
CEOChristopher UrmsonArvind Krishna
Price5.3 USD291.97 USD
Market Cap9.37 billion USD271.36 billion USD
Beta2.600.65
ExchangeNASDAQNYSE
IPO DateMay 10, 2021September 24, 1915
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AUR and IBM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AUR vs. IBM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AUR

-42.79%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
47.24%
Q3
23.27%
Median
12.85%
Q1
2.22%
Min
-26.63%

AUR has a negative Return on Equity of -42.79%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

IBM

21.32%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
47.24%
Q3
23.27%
Median
12.85%
Q1
2.22%
Min
-26.63%

IBM’s Return on Equity of 21.32% is on par with the norm for the Information Technology Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

AUR vs. IBM: A comparison of their ROE against the Information Technology Services industry benchmark.

Return on Invested Capital

AUR

-40.98%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
28.29%
Q3
13.19%
Median
7.24%
Q1
0.23%
Min
-18.82%

AUR has a negative Return on Invested Capital of -40.98%. This indicates that its operations are failing to generate a profit on the total capital invested, signaling significant inefficiency or value destruction.

IBM

8.48%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
28.29%
Q3
13.19%
Median
7.24%
Q1
0.23%
Min
-18.82%

IBM’s Return on Invested Capital of 8.48% is in line with the norm for the Information Technology Services industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

AUR vs. IBM: A comparison of their ROIC against the Information Technology Services industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin

AUR

--

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
20.47%
Q3
11.62%
Median
5.97%
Q1
1.89%
Min
-4.62%

Net Profit Margin data for AUR is currently unavailable.

IBM

8.71%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
20.47%
Q3
11.62%
Median
5.97%
Q1
1.89%
Min
-4.62%

IBM’s Net Profit Margin of 8.71% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Information Technology Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

AUR vs. IBM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against the Information Technology Services industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin

AUR

--

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
29.42%
Q3
14.75%
Median
8.92%
Q1
2.62%
Min
-11.92%

Operating Profit Margin data for AUR is currently unavailable.

IBM

16.36%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
29.42%
Q3
14.75%
Median
8.92%
Q1
2.62%
Min
-11.92%

An Operating Profit Margin of 16.36% places IBM in the upper quartile for the Information Technology Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

AUR vs. IBM: A comparison of their Operating Margin against the Information Technology Services industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAURIBM
Return on Equity (TTM)-42.79%21.32%
Return on Assets (TTM)-38.19%3.76%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)-40.98%8.48%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)--8.71%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)--16.36%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)--57.04%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AUR

9.54

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
3.41
Q3
2.37
Median
1.58
Q1
1.20
Min
0.00

AUR’s Current Ratio of 9.54 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Information Technology Services industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

IBM

1.01

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
3.41
Q3
2.37
Median
1.58
Q1
1.20
Min
0.00

IBM’s Current Ratio of 1.01 falls into the lower quartile for the Information Technology Services industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

AUR vs. IBM: A comparison of their Current Ratio against the Information Technology Services industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AUR

0.06

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
2.63
Q3
1.16
Median
0.48
Q1
0.09
Min
0.01

Falling into the lower quartile for the Information Technology Services industry, AUR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.06 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

IBM

2.49

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
2.63
Q3
1.16
Median
0.48
Q1
0.09
Min
0.01

IBM’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Information Technology Services industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.49. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

AUR vs. IBM: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against the Information Technology Services industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AUR

--

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
17.52
Q3
10.04
Median
4.66
Q1
0.80
Min
-10.50

Interest Coverage Ratio data for AUR is currently unavailable.

IBM

5.92

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
17.52
Q3
10.04
Median
4.66
Q1
0.80
Min
-10.50

IBM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.92 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Information Technology Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

AUR vs. IBM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against the Information Technology Services industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAURIBM
Current Ratio (TTM)9.541.01
Quick Ratio (TTM)9.540.97
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.062.49
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.060.46
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)0.074.53
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)--5.92

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AUR and IBM. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AUR vs. IBM: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AUR vs. IBM: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AUR vs. IBM: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AUR

0.00%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
16.57%
Q3
1.39%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AUR currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

IBM

2.29%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
16.57%
Q3
1.39%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 2.29%, IBM offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Information Technology Services industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

AUR vs. IBM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against the Information Technology Services industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AUR

0.00%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
112.81%
Q3
20.98%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AUR has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

IBM

112.81%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
112.81%
Q3
20.98%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

IBM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 112.81% is above 100%. This means the company is paying out more in dividends than it earned, a practice that is often unsustainable and could indicate a risk to future dividend stability.

AUR vs. IBM: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against the Information Technology Services industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAURIBM
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%2.29%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%112.81%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AUR

-11.69

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
49.12
Q3
36.91
Median
24.84
Q1
15.88
Min
1.55

AUR has a negative P/E Ratio of -11.69. This occurs when a company has negative earnings (a net loss), making the ratio unsuitable for valuation analysis.

IBM

49.51

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
49.12
Q3
36.91
Median
24.84
Q1
15.88
Min
1.55

At 49.51, IBM’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Information Technology Services industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

AUR vs. IBM: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against the Information Technology Services industry benchmark.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AUR

0.45

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
5.35
Q3
3.79
Median
2.23
Q1
1.19
Min
0.03

In the lower quartile for the Information Technology Services industry, AUR’s Forward PEG Ratio of 0.45 is a positive indicator. It suggests that the stock may be attractively valued relative to its expected earnings growth.

IBM

9.51

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
5.35
Q3
3.79
Median
2.23
Q1
1.19
Min
0.03

IBM’s Forward PEG Ratio of 9.51 is exceptionally high for the Information Technology Services industry. This suggests its stock price is very high relative to its expected earnings growth, signaling significant overvaluation risk.

AUR vs. IBM: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against the Information Technology Services industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AUR

--

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
8.15
Q3
4.17
Median
2.14
Q1
1.00
Min
0.10

P/S Ratio data for AUR is currently unavailable.

IBM

4.32

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
8.15
Q3
4.17
Median
2.14
Q1
1.00
Min
0.10

IBM’s P/S Ratio of 4.32 is in the upper echelon for the Information Technology Services industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

AUR vs. IBM: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against the Information Technology Services industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AUR

5.18

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
11.78
Q3
6.14
Median
3.23
Q1
1.97
Min
0.42

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Information Technology Services industry.

IBM

10.08

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
11.78
Q3
6.14
Median
3.23
Q1
1.97
Min
0.42

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Information Technology Services industry.

AUR vs. IBM: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against the Information Technology Services industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAURIBM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)-11.6949.51
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)0.459.51
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)--4.32
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)5.1810.08
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)-14.7022.73
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)-11.8226.54
EV-to-Sales (TTM)--5.21