AUR vs. GLW: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AUR and GLW, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength.
Company Overview
GLW’s market capitalization of 42.48 billion USD is significantly greater than AUR’s 9.66 billion USD, highlighting its more substantial market valuation.
AUR’s beta of 2.60 points to significantly higher volatility compared to GLW (beta: 1.10), suggesting AUR has greater potential for both gains and losses relative to market movements.
Symbol | AUR | GLW |
---|---|---|
Company Name | Aurora Innovation, Inc. | Corning Incorporated |
Country | US | US |
Sector | Technology | Technology |
Industry | Information Technology Services | Hardware, Equipment & Parts |
CEO | Mr. Christopher Urmson Ph.D. | Mr. Wendell P. Weeks |
Price | 5.46 USD | 49.6 USD |
Market Cap | 9.66 billion USD | 42.48 billion USD |
Beta | 2.60 | 1.10 |
Exchange | NASDAQ | NYSE |
IPO Date | May 10, 2021 | December 31, 1981 |
ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AUR and GLW over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
This section compares the market valuation of AUR and GLW. Key takeaways regarding their valuation, when viewed within their industry context, are presented in the commentary that follows.
- AUR’s Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratio of -12.04 indicates negative earnings, signaling current unprofitability. GLW, with a very high P/E ratio of 93.41, appears to have a valuation that either is significantly stretched or reflects high expectations for substantial future growth.
- GLW’s Forward PEG ratio of 7.43 is very high. This signifies that its current stock price is notably elevated compared to its anticipated earnings growth rate, possibly indicating that the market has already factored in, or even exceeded, realistic future performance expectations.
Symbol | AUR | GLW |
---|---|---|
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | -12.04 | 93.41 |
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 0.46 | 7.43 |
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | -- | 3.12 |
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 5.33 | 3.96 |
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | -12.19 | 21.08 |
EV-to-Sales (TTM) | -- | 3.62 |
Dividend Comparison
AUR currently offers no dividend yield, suggesting it may be reinvesting available cash back into the business for future growth, while GLW provides a 2.26% dividend yield, offering investors a component of income return.
Symbol | AUR | GLW |
---|---|---|
Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 2.26% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
Explore the financial strength details for AUR and GLW in the table below.
Symbol | AUR | GLW |
---|---|---|
Current Ratio (TTM) | 9.54 | 1.69 |
Quick Ratio (TTM) | 9.54 | 1.05 |
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.06 | 0.76 |
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM) | 0.06 | 0.30 |
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM) | 0.07 | 2.91 |
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | 4.55 |