Seek Returns logo

AUR vs. FTV: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AUR and FTV, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolAURFTV
Company NameAurora Innovation, Inc.Fortive Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyIndustrials
GICS IndustrySoftwareMachinery
Market Capitalization10.98 billion USD16.41 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateMay 10, 2021July 5, 2016
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AUR and FTV by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AUR vs. FTV: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolAURFTV
5-Day Price Return-6.52%0.73%
13-Week Price Return-0.66%-30.85%
26-Week Price Return-36.43%-41.54%
52-Week Price Return55.96%-33.03%
Month-to-Date Return3.61%1.21%
Year-to-Date Return-4.44%-35.32%
10-Day Avg. Volume22.99M4.65M
3-Month Avg. Volume23.03M3.83M
3-Month Volatility47.87%54.78%
Beta2.451.09

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

AUR

-42.25%

Software Industry

Max
59.01%
Q3
21.98%
Median
7.15%
Q1
-11.12%
Min
-51.24%

AUR has a negative Return on Equity of -42.25%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

FTV

7.44%

Machinery Industry

Max
34.68%
Q3
19.06%
Median
13.13%
Q1
8.53%
Min
-4.87%

FTV’s Return on Equity of 7.44% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

AUR vs. FTV: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Software and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

AUR

-20,100.00%

Software Industry

Max
48.14%
Q3
18.23%
Median
5.60%
Q1
-9.22%
Min
-49.36%

AUR has a negative Net Profit Margin of -20,100.00%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

FTV

12.51%

Machinery Industry

Max
19.74%
Q3
11.24%
Median
8.13%
Q1
5.38%
Min
-1.11%

A Net Profit Margin of 12.51% places FTV in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

AUR vs. FTV: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

AUR

-23,000.00%

Software Industry

Max
57.34%
Q3
20.60%
Median
7.84%
Q1
-8.72%
Min
-51.37%

AUR has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -23,000.00%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

FTV

17.22%

Machinery Industry

Max
26.63%
Q3
16.15%
Median
11.27%
Q1
7.72%
Min
-4.91%

An Operating Profit Margin of 17.22% places FTV in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

AUR vs. FTV: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAURFTV
Return on Equity (TTM)-42.25%7.44%
Return on Assets (TTM)-37.29%4.40%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-20,100.00%12.51%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-23,000.00%17.22%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)--59.78%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

AUR

16.96

Software Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.31
Median
1.45
Q1
1.03
Min
0.24

AUR’s Current Ratio of 16.96 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Software industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

FTV

0.98

Machinery Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.32
Median
1.72
Q1
1.28
Min
0.78

FTV’s Current Ratio of 0.98 falls into the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

AUR vs. FTV: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

AUR

0.00

Software Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
0.90
Median
0.29
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

AUR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

FTV

0.46

Machinery Industry

Max
1.49
Q3
0.75
Median
0.44
Q1
0.26
Min
0.00

FTV’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.46 is typical for the Machinery industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

AUR vs. FTV: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

AUR

-30.17

Software Industry

Max
67.02
Q3
19.86
Median
0.70
Q1
-12.50
Min
-53.00

AUR has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -30.17. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

FTV

6.04

Machinery Industry

Max
67.55
Q3
33.79
Median
13.87
Q1
7.97
Min
-1.43

In the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, FTV’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.04 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

AUR vs. FTV: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAURFTV
Current Ratio (MRQ)16.960.98
Quick Ratio (MRQ)16.960.77
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.000.46
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-30.176.04

Growth

Revenue Growth

AUR vs. FTV: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

AUR vs. FTV: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

AUR

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
0.08%
Q3
0.03%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AUR currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

FTV

0.67%

Machinery Industry

Max
5.32%
Q3
2.84%
Median
1.87%
Q1
1.09%
Min
0.00%

FTV’s Dividend Yield of 0.67% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

AUR vs. FTV: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Software and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

AUR

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
1.32%
Q3
0.53%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AUR has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

FTV

14.22%

Machinery Industry

Max
202.17%
Q3
98.65%
Median
55.54%
Q1
29.03%
Min
0.00%

FTV’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 14.22% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

AUR vs. FTV: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAURFTV
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.67%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%14.22%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

AUR

--

Software Industry

Max
149.35
Q3
100.21
Median
47.97
Q1
26.77
Min
11.68

P/E Ratio data for AUR is currently unavailable.

FTV

21.25

Machinery Industry

Max
53.66
Q3
31.29
Median
22.00
Q1
16.18
Min
7.00

FTV’s P/E Ratio of 21.25 is within the middle range for the Machinery industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

AUR vs. FTV: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

AUR

10,647.57

Software Industry

Max
25.24
Q3
13.52
Median
8.15
Q1
4.87
Min
0.98

With a P/S Ratio of 10,647.57, AUR trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Software industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

FTV

2.66

Machinery Industry

Max
5.04
Q3
2.72
Median
1.67
Q1
1.04
Min
0.24

FTV’s P/S Ratio of 2.66 aligns with the market consensus for the Machinery industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

AUR vs. FTV: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

AUR

4.66

Software Industry

Max
30.95
Q3
14.91
Median
7.75
Q1
3.60
Min
0.38

AUR’s P/B Ratio of 4.66 is within the conventional range for the Software industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

FTV

2.34

Machinery Industry

Max
7.23
Q3
3.90
Median
2.52
Q1
1.47
Min
0.49

FTV’s P/B Ratio of 2.34 is within the conventional range for the Machinery industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

AUR vs. FTV: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAURFTV
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--21.25
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)10,647.572.66
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.662.34
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)--11.79