AUR vs. FTV: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AUR and FTV, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
FTV stands out with 23.83 billion USD in market value—about 2.22× AUR’s market cap of 10.72 billion USD.
AUR’s beta of 2.77 points to much larger expected swings compared to FTV’s calmer 1.16, suggesting both higher upside and downside potential.
| Symbol | AUR | FTV |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Aurora Innovation, Inc. | Fortive Corporation |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Information Technology Services | Hardware, Equipment & Parts |
| CEO | Mr. Christopher Urmson Ph.D. | Mr. James A. Lico |
| Price | 6.06 USD | 70.1 USD |
| Market Cap | 10.72 billion USD | 23.83 billion USD |
| Beta | 2.77 | 1.16 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NYSE |
| IPO Date | May 10, 2021 | July 5, 2016 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AUR and FTV over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of AUR and FTV based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- AUR posts a negative P/E of -13.36, reflecting last year’s net loss, while FTV at 29.99 signals healthy earnings.
- AUR has a negative Price-to-Free Cash Flow ratio of -16.83, signaling it consumed more cash than it produced over the last year—an important liquidity warning. In contrast, FTV (P/FCF 17.13) indicates positive free cash flow generation.
| Symbol | AUR | FTV |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | -13.36 | 29.99 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 0.51 | 2.51 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 0.00 | 3.85 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 5.92 | 2.34 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | -16.83 | 17.13 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | -13.53 | 17.63 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 0.00 | 4.33 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | -16.74 | 19.26 |
Dividend Comparison
AUR offers a 0% dividend yield, suggesting it may be reinvesting available cash back into the business for future growth, while FTV provides a 0.46% dividend yield, giving investors a steady income stream.
| Symbol | AUR | FTV |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.46% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AUR and FTV, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- FTV’s current ratio of 0.99 indicates its assets may not cover near-term debts, whereas AUR at 9.54 maintains healthy liquidity.
- FTV posts a quick ratio of 0.78, indicating limited coverage of short-term debts from its most liquid assets—while AUR at 9.54 enjoys stronger liquidity resilience.
- AUR shows “--” for interest coverage, hinting at negligible interest costs, whereas FTV (at 10.46) covers its interest obligations.
| Symbol | AUR | FTV |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 9.54 | 0.99 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 9.54 | 0.78 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.06 | 0.38 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.06 | 0.23 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | 10.46 |