Seek Returns logo

AUR vs. FTV: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AUR and FTV, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

FTV’s market capitalization of 18.03 billion USD is significantly greater than AUR’s 9.37 billion USD, highlighting its more substantial market valuation.

AUR’s beta of 2.60 points to significantly higher volatility compared to FTV (beta: 1.16), suggesting AUR has greater potential for both gains and losses relative to market movements.

SymbolAURFTV
Company NameAurora Innovation, Inc.Fortive Corporation
CountryUSUS
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustryInformation Technology ServicesHardware, Equipment & Parts
CEOChristopher UrmsonJames A. Lico
Price5.3 USD53.05 USD
Market Cap9.37 billion USD18.03 billion USD
Beta2.601.16
ExchangeNASDAQNYSE
IPO DateMay 10, 2021July 5, 2016
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AUR and FTV by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AUR vs. FTV: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AUR

-42.79%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
47.24%
Q3
23.27%
Median
12.85%
Q1
2.22%
Min
-26.63%

AUR has a negative Return on Equity of -42.79%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

FTV

7.69%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
38.64%
Q3
17.03%
Median
8.95%
Q1
1.23%
Min
-14.34%

FTV’s Return on Equity of 7.69% is on par with the norm for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

AUR vs. FTV: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Information Technology Services and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AUR

-40.98%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
28.29%
Q3
13.19%
Median
7.24%
Q1
0.23%
Min
-18.82%

AUR has a negative Return on Invested Capital of -40.98%. This indicates that its operations are failing to generate a profit on the total capital invested, signaling significant inefficiency or value destruction.

FTV

6.31%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
17.24%
Q3
9.87%
Median
6.54%
Q1
1.56%
Min
-7.50%

FTV’s Return on Invested Capital of 6.31% is in line with the norm for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

AUR vs. FTV: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Information Technology Services and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AUR

--

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
20.47%
Q3
11.62%
Median
5.97%
Q1
1.89%
Min
-4.62%

Net Profit Margin data for AUR is currently unavailable.

FTV

12.90%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
22.76%
Q3
11.04%
Median
3.80%
Q1
1.13%
Min
-8.57%

A Net Profit Margin of 12.90% places FTV in the upper quartile for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

AUR vs. FTV: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Information Technology Services and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AUR

--

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
29.42%
Q3
14.75%
Median
8.92%
Q1
2.62%
Min
-11.92%

Operating Profit Margin data for AUR is currently unavailable.

FTV

18.41%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
25.25%
Q3
13.73%
Median
8.22%
Q1
4.35%
Min
-0.79%

An Operating Profit Margin of 18.41% places FTV in the upper quartile for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

AUR vs. FTV: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Information Technology Services and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAURFTV
Return on Equity (TTM)-42.79%7.69%
Return on Assets (TTM)-38.19%4.65%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)-40.98%6.31%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)--12.90%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)--18.41%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)--59.98%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AUR

9.54

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
3.41
Q3
2.37
Median
1.58
Q1
1.20
Min
0.00

AUR’s Current Ratio of 9.54 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Information Technology Services industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

FTV

0.99

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
4.10
Q3
3.23
Median
2.37
Q1
1.81
Min
0.58

FTV’s Current Ratio of 0.99 falls into the lower quartile for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

AUR vs. FTV: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Information Technology Services and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AUR

0.06

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
2.63
Q3
1.16
Median
0.48
Q1
0.09
Min
0.01

Falling into the lower quartile for the Information Technology Services industry, AUR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.06 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

FTV

0.38

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
1.19
Q3
0.56
Median
0.33
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

FTV’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.38 is typical for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

AUR vs. FTV: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Information Technology Services and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AUR

--

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
17.52
Q3
10.04
Median
4.66
Q1
0.80
Min
-10.50

Interest Coverage Ratio data for AUR is currently unavailable.

FTV

10.46

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
28.37
Q3
14.25
Median
9.35
Q1
2.86
Min
-13.16

FTV’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 10.46 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

AUR vs. FTV: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Information Technology Services and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAURFTV
Current Ratio (TTM)9.540.99
Quick Ratio (TTM)9.540.78
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.060.38
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.060.23
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)0.071.95
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)--10.46

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AUR and FTV. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AUR vs. FTV: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AUR vs. FTV: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AUR vs. FTV: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AUR

0.00%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
16.57%
Q3
1.39%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AUR currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

FTV

0.60%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
2.16%
Q3
0.66%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FTV’s Dividend Yield of 0.60% is consistent with its peers in the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

AUR vs. FTV: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Information Technology Services and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AUR

0.00%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
112.81%
Q3
20.98%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AUR has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

FTV

13.83%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
71.55%
Q3
25.37%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FTV’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 13.83% is within the typical range for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

AUR vs. FTV: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Information Technology Services and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAURFTV
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.60%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%13.83%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AUR

-11.69

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
49.12
Q3
36.91
Median
24.84
Q1
15.88
Min
1.55

AUR has a negative P/E Ratio of -11.69. This occurs when a company has negative earnings (a net loss), making the ratio unsuitable for valuation analysis.

FTV

22.69

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
86.58
Q3
53.54
Median
36.07
Q1
25.99
Min
12.16

In the lower quartile for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, FTV’s P/E Ratio of 22.69 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

AUR vs. FTV: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Information Technology Services and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AUR

0.45

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
5.35
Q3
3.79
Median
2.23
Q1
1.19
Min
0.03

In the lower quartile for the Information Technology Services industry, AUR’s Forward PEG Ratio of 0.45 is a positive indicator. It suggests that the stock may be attractively valued relative to its expected earnings growth.

FTV

2.59

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
5.22
Q3
3.27
Median
2.16
Q1
1.77
Min
0.00

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry.

AUR vs. FTV: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Information Technology Services and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AUR

--

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
8.15
Q3
4.17
Median
2.14
Q1
1.00
Min
0.10

P/S Ratio data for AUR is currently unavailable.

FTV

2.92

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
8.50
Q3
4.95
Median
2.45
Q1
1.17
Min
0.32

FTV’s P/S Ratio of 2.92 aligns with the market consensus for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

AUR vs. FTV: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Information Technology Services and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AUR

5.18

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
11.78
Q3
6.14
Median
3.23
Q1
1.97
Min
0.42

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Information Technology Services industry.

FTV

1.77

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
7.53
Q3
4.63
Median
3.34
Q1
2.35
Min
0.48

FTV’s P/B Ratio of 1.77 is in the lower quartile for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

AUR vs. FTV: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Information Technology Services and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAURFTV
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)-11.6922.69
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)0.452.59
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)--2.92
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)5.181.77
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)-14.7012.96
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)-11.8213.82
EV-to-Sales (TTM)--3.40