AUR vs. FOUR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AUR and FOUR, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
AUR dominates in value with a market cap of 10.72 billion USD, eclipsing FOUR’s 5.89 billion USD by roughly 1.82×.
AUR’s beta of 2.77 points to much larger expected swings compared to FOUR’s calmer 1.80, suggesting both higher upside and downside potential.
Symbol | AUR | FOUR |
---|---|---|
Company Name | Aurora Innovation, Inc. | Shift4 Payments, Inc. |
Country | US | US |
Sector | Technology | Technology |
Industry | Information Technology Services | Software - Infrastructure |
CEO | Mr. Christopher Urmson Ph.D. | Mr. Jared Isaacman |
Price | 6.06 USD | 87.34 USD |
Market Cap | 10.72 billion USD | 5.89 billion USD |
Beta | 2.77 | 1.80 |
Exchange | NASDAQ | NYSE |
IPO Date | May 10, 2021 | June 5, 2020 |
ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AUR and FOUR over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of AUR and FOUR based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- AUR posts a negative P/E of -13.36, reflecting last year’s net loss, while FOUR at 27.08 signals healthy earnings.
- AUR has a negative Price-to-Free Cash Flow ratio of -16.83, signaling it consumed more cash than it produced over the last year—an important liquidity warning. In contrast, FOUR (P/FCF 12.47) indicates positive free cash flow generation.
Symbol | AUR | FOUR |
---|---|---|
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | -13.36 | 27.08 |
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 0.51 | 1.65 |
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 0.00 | 1.70 |
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 5.92 | 7.34 |
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | -16.83 | 12.47 |
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | -13.53 | -20.81 |
EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 0.00 | 2.19 |
EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | -16.74 | 16.10 |
Dividend Comparison
Neither AUR nor FOUR currently pays a dividend yield; this often indicates they are reinvesting earnings for growth, prioritizing long-term expansion over immediate cash returns to shareholders.
Symbol | AUR | FOUR |
---|---|---|
Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AUR and FOUR, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- FOUR is highly leveraged (debt-to-equity ratio 3.58), elevating both potential gains and risks, compared to AUR at 0.06, which maintains a steadier capital structure.
- AUR shows “--” for interest coverage, hinting at negligible interest costs, whereas FOUR (at 3.05) covers its interest obligations.
Symbol | AUR | FOUR |
---|---|---|
Current Ratio (TTM) | 9.54 | 1.36 |
Quick Ratio (TTM) | 9.54 | 1.36 |
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.06 | 3.58 |
Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.06 | 0.58 |
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | 3.05 |