AUR vs. ERIC: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AUR and ERIC, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
ERIC stands out with 29.42 billion USD in market value—about 2.74× AUR’s market cap of 10.72 billion USD.
AUR’s beta of 2.77 points to much larger expected swings compared to ERIC’s calmer 0.44, suggesting both higher upside and downside potential.
ERIC is an ADR, letting U.S. buyers tap its non-U.S. business directly, unlike AUR, which is purely domestic.
| Symbol | AUR | ERIC |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Aurora Innovation, Inc. | Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) |
| Country | US | SE |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Information Technology Services | Communication Equipment |
| CEO | Mr. Christopher Urmson Ph.D. | Mr. Anthony F. Bartolo |
| Price | 6.06 USD | 8.86 USD |
| Market Cap | 10.72 billion USD | 29.42 billion USD |
| Beta | 2.77 | 0.44 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NASDAQ |
| IPO Date | May 10, 2021 | August 24, 1981 |
| ADR | No | Yes |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AUR and ERIC over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of AUR and ERIC based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- AUR has a negative P/E (-13.36) due to recent losses. In contrast, ERIC commands a premium multiple of 175.26, signaling strong market confidence in its future earnings growth to justify this high valuation.
- ERIC shows a negative forward PEG of -63.14, signaling expected earnings contraction, while AUR at 0.51 maintains analysts’ projections for stable or improved profits.
- AUR has a negative Price-to-Free Cash Flow ratio of -16.83, signaling it consumed more cash than it produced over the last year—an important liquidity warning. In contrast, ERIC (P/FCF 6.70) indicates positive free cash flow generation.
| Symbol | AUR | ERIC |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | -13.36 | 175.26 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 0.51 | -63.14 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 0.00 | 1.13 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 5.92 | 3.28 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | -16.83 | 6.70 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | -13.53 | 6.10 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 0.00 | 1.12 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | -16.74 | 6.64 |
Dividend Comparison
AUR offers a 0% dividend yield, suggesting it may be reinvesting available cash back into the business for future growth, while ERIC provides a 3.28% dividend yield, giving investors a steady income stream.
| Symbol | AUR | ERIC |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 3.28% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AUR and ERIC, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- AUR shows “--” for interest coverage, hinting at negligible interest costs, whereas ERIC (at 6.76) covers its interest obligations.
| Symbol | AUR | ERIC |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 9.54 | 1.09 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 9.54 | 0.88 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.06 | 0.49 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.06 | 0.15 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | 6.76 |