AUR vs. CRDO: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AUR and CRDO, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
With AUR at 10.72 billion USD and CRDO at 10.26 billion USD, their market capitalizations sit in the same ballpark.
With betas of 2.77 for AUR and 2.29 for CRDO, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.
Symbol | AUR | CRDO |
---|---|---|
Company Name | Aurora Innovation, Inc. | Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd |
Country | US | US |
Sector | Technology | Technology |
Industry | Information Technology Services | Communication Equipment |
CEO | Mr. Christopher Urmson Ph.D. | Mr. William J. Brennan |
Price | 6.06 USD | 60.45 USD |
Market Cap | 10.72 billion USD | 10.26 billion USD |
Beta | 2.77 | 2.29 |
Exchange | NASDAQ | NASDAQ |
IPO Date | May 10, 2021 | January 27, 2022 |
ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AUR and CRDO over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of AUR and CRDO based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- AUR has a negative P/E (-13.36) due to recent losses. In contrast, CRDO commands a premium multiple of 1986.26, signaling strong market confidence in its future earnings growth to justify this high valuation.
- AUR and CRDO both consumed more free cash flow than they generated last year—P/FCF of -16.83 and -424.45, respectively—highlighting persistent liquidity pressure.
Symbol | AUR | CRDO |
---|---|---|
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | -13.36 | 1986.26 |
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 0.51 | 74.87 |
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 0.00 | 31.34 |
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 5.92 | 16.44 |
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | -16.83 | -424.45 |
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | -13.53 | 1084.70 |
EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 0.00 | 30.47 |
EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | -16.74 | -412.74 |
Dividend Comparison
Neither AUR nor CRDO currently pays a dividend yield; this often indicates they are reinvesting earnings for growth, prioritizing long-term expansion over immediate cash returns to shareholders.
Symbol | AUR | CRDO |
---|---|---|
Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AUR and CRDO, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- Neither AUR nor CRDO records interest coverage (both “--”), indicating virtually no interest expense—usually a sign of negligible debt.
Symbol | AUR | CRDO |
---|---|---|
Current Ratio (TTM) | 9.54 | 7.67 |
Quick Ratio (TTM) | 9.54 | 7.01 |
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.06 | 0.03 |
Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.06 | 0.02 |
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | -- |