Seek Returns logo

AU vs. MOS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AU and MOS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolAUMOS
Company NameAngloGold Ashanti plcThe Mosaic Company
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorMaterialsMaterials
GICS IndustryMetals & MiningChemicals
Market Capitalization37.01 billion USD10.96 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateAugust 5, 1998January 26, 1988
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AU and MOS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AU vs. MOS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolAUMOS
5-Day Price Return5.82%-0.49%
13-Week Price Return56.97%-7.35%
26-Week Price Return97.52%27.84%
52-Week Price Return172.06%27.42%
Month-to-Date Return4.25%-0.43%
Year-to-Date Return217.68%40.48%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.12M4.18M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.39M4.91M
3-Month Volatility42.57%38.66%
Beta0.620.98

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

AU

32.52%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
41.55%
Q3
17.74%
Median
9.00%
Q1
1.65%
Min
-21.32%

In the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry, AU’s Return on Equity of 32.52% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

MOS

7.92%

Chemicals Industry

Max
29.52%
Q3
13.18%
Median
6.53%
Q1
1.35%
Min
-11.86%

MOS’s Return on Equity of 7.92% is on par with the norm for the Chemicals industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

AU vs. MOS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

AU

22.19%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
43.69%
Q3
19.12%
Median
6.48%
Q1
1.50%
Min
-20.21%

A Net Profit Margin of 22.19% places AU in the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

MOS

8.35%

Chemicals Industry

Max
20.20%
Q3
9.15%
Median
3.94%
Q1
0.60%
Min
-10.43%

MOS’s Net Profit Margin of 8.35% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Chemicals industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

AU vs. MOS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

AU

35.74%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
71.84%
Q3
32.31%
Median
12.50%
Q1
2.69%
Min
-23.81%

An Operating Profit Margin of 35.74% places AU in the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

MOS

7.09%

Chemicals Industry

Max
27.33%
Q3
13.82%
Median
7.98%
Q1
3.60%
Min
-7.61%

MOS’s Operating Profit Margin of 7.09% is around the midpoint for the Chemicals industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

AU vs. MOS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAUMOS
Return on Equity (TTM)32.52%7.92%
Return on Assets (TTM)16.40%4.01%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)22.19%8.35%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)35.74%7.09%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)42.65%15.33%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

AU

2.99

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
5.27
Q3
3.04
Median
1.96
Q1
1.42
Min
0.13

AU’s Current Ratio of 2.99 aligns with the median group of the Metals & Mining industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MOS

1.14

Chemicals Industry

Max
3.72
Q3
2.38
Median
1.69
Q1
1.42
Min
0.75

MOS’s Current Ratio of 1.14 falls into the lower quartile for the Chemicals industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

AU vs. MOS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

AU

0.31

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
1.10
Q3
0.51
Median
0.33
Q1
0.09
Min
0.00

AU’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.31 is typical for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

MOS

0.35

Chemicals Industry

Max
1.53
Q3
1.00
Median
0.69
Q1
0.41
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Chemicals industry, MOS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.35 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

AU vs. MOS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

AU

--

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
51.62
Q3
22.73
Median
5.76
Q1
0.82
Min
-21.72

Interest Coverage Ratio data for AU is currently unavailable.

MOS

2.00

Chemicals Industry

Max
56.43
Q3
26.33
Median
8.84
Q1
2.54
Min
-9.39

In the lower quartile for the Chemicals industry, MOS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.00 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

AU vs. MOS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAUMOS
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.991.14
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.220.39
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.310.35
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)--2.00

Growth

Revenue Growth

AU vs. MOS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

AU vs. MOS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

AU

2.20%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
8.17%
Q3
3.57%
Median
1.25%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AU’s Dividend Yield of 2.20% is consistent with its peers in the Metals & Mining industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

MOS

2.46%

Chemicals Industry

Max
6.59%
Q3
3.67%
Median
2.44%
Q1
1.36%
Min
0.00%

MOS’s Dividend Yield of 2.46% is consistent with its peers in the Chemicals industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

AU vs. MOS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

AU

39.60%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
138.08%
Q3
62.06%
Median
33.17%
Q1
10.41%
Min
0.00%

AU’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 39.60% is within the typical range for the Metals & Mining industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MOS

29.18%

Chemicals Industry

Max
192.00%
Q3
108.95%
Median
57.38%
Q1
27.28%
Min
0.00%

MOS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 29.18% is within the typical range for the Chemicals industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

AU vs. MOS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAUMOS
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.20%2.46%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)39.60%29.18%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

AU

17.99

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
83.04
Q3
41.69
Median
20.30
Q1
12.95
Min
1.75

AU’s P/E Ratio of 17.99 is within the middle range for the Metals & Mining industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

MOS

11.87

Chemicals Industry

Max
49.43
Q3
32.03
Median
21.32
Q1
14.93
Min
8.66

In the lower quartile for the Chemicals industry, MOS’s P/E Ratio of 11.87 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

AU vs. MOS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

AU

3.99

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
9.28
Q3
4.28
Median
2.37
Q1
0.86
Min
0.16

AU’s P/S Ratio of 3.99 aligns with the market consensus for the Metals & Mining industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

MOS

0.99

Chemicals Industry

Max
3.90
Q3
2.23
Median
1.00
Q1
0.55
Min
0.15

MOS’s P/S Ratio of 0.99 aligns with the market consensus for the Chemicals industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

AU vs. MOS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

AU

3.10

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
4.68
Q3
2.45
Median
1.55
Q1
0.94
Min
0.34

AU’s P/B Ratio of 3.10 is in the upper tier for the Metals & Mining industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

MOS

0.93

Chemicals Industry

Max
5.01
Q3
2.59
Median
1.50
Q1
0.95
Min
0.30

MOS’s P/B Ratio of 0.93 is in the lower quartile for the Chemicals industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

AU vs. MOS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAUMOS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)17.9911.87
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.990.99
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.100.93
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)20.6629.60