Seek Returns logo

AU vs. LYB: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AU and LYB, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

AU’s market capitalization stands at 23.52 billion USD, while LYB’s is 19.93 billion USD, indicating their market valuations are broadly comparable.

LYB carries a higher beta at 0.84, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while AU (beta: 0.49) exhibits greater stability.

SymbolAULYB
Company NameAngloGold Ashanti PlcLyondellBasell Industries N.V.
CountryGBUS
SectorBasic MaterialsBasic Materials
IndustryGoldChemicals - Specialty
CEOAlberto Calderon Zuleta BA Econ, Econ, Law, M Phil Econ,Peter Z. E. Vanacker
Price46.71 USD62.01 USD
Market Cap23.52 billion USD19.93 billion USD
Beta0.490.84
ExchangeNYSENYSE
IPO DateAugust 5, 1998April 28, 2010
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AU and LYB by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AU vs. LYB: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AU

25.86%

Gold Industry

Max
25.86%
Q3
12.48%
Median
8.15%
Q1
2.34%
Min
-3.82%

In the upper quartile for the Gold industry, AU’s Return on Equity of 25.86% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

LYB

8.23%

Chemicals - Specialty Industry

Max
34.45%
Q3
15.78%
Median
7.65%
Q1
2.96%
Min
-12.04%

LYB’s Return on Equity of 8.23% is on par with the norm for the Chemicals - Specialty industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

AU vs. LYB: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Gold and Chemicals - Specialty industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AU

12.23%

Gold Industry

Max
20.84%
Q3
9.90%
Median
5.11%
Q1
1.36%
Min
-10.62%

In the upper quartile for the Gold industry, AU’s Return on Invested Capital of 12.23% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

LYB

3.39%

Chemicals - Specialty Industry

Max
20.22%
Q3
10.99%
Median
5.25%
Q1
3.06%
Min
-8.62%

LYB’s Return on Invested Capital of 3.39% is in line with the norm for the Chemicals - Specialty industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

AU vs. LYB: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Gold and Chemicals - Specialty industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AU

17.91%

Gold Industry

Max
26.48%
Q3
21.01%
Median
16.48%
Q1
8.22%
Min
-6.63%

AU’s Net Profit Margin of 17.91% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Gold industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

LYB

2.80%

Chemicals - Specialty Industry

Max
23.23%
Q3
10.64%
Median
5.14%
Q1
0.64%
Min
-8.93%

LYB’s Net Profit Margin of 2.80% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Chemicals - Specialty industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

AU vs. LYB: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Gold and Chemicals - Specialty industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AU

29.67%

Gold Industry

Max
67.43%
Q3
40.39%
Median
30.64%
Q1
19.83%
Min
-9.84%

AU’s Operating Profit Margin of 29.67% is around the midpoint for the Gold industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

LYB

3.08%

Chemicals - Specialty Industry

Max
26.42%
Q3
15.81%
Median
10.07%
Q1
4.82%
Min
-7.44%

LYB’s Operating Profit Margin of 3.08% is in the lower quartile for the Chemicals - Specialty industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

AU vs. LYB: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Gold and Chemicals - Specialty industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAULYB
Return on Equity (TTM)25.86%8.23%
Return on Assets (TTM)10.37%3.03%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)12.23%3.39%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)17.91%2.80%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)29.67%3.08%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)35.78%10.25%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AU

2.34

Gold Industry

Max
4.98
Q3
3.76
Median
2.34
Q1
1.51
Min
0.52

AU’s Current Ratio of 2.34 aligns with the median group of the Gold industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

LYB

1.83

Chemicals - Specialty Industry

Max
3.95
Q3
2.60
Median
2.04
Q1
1.60
Min
0.77

LYB’s Current Ratio of 1.83 aligns with the median group of the Chemicals - Specialty industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

AU vs. LYB: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Gold and Chemicals - Specialty industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AU

0.33

Gold Industry

Max
0.67
Q3
0.34
Median
0.17
Q1
0.06
Min
0.00

AU’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.33 is typical for the Gold industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

LYB

1.04

Chemicals - Specialty Industry

Max
1.65
Q3
1.10
Median
0.73
Q1
0.55
Min
0.01

LYB’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.04 is typical for the Chemicals - Specialty industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

AU vs. LYB: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Gold and Chemicals - Specialty industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AU

14.20

Gold Industry

Max
45.23
Q3
25.79
Median
13.44
Q1
2.91
Min
-6.26

AU’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 14.20 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Gold industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

LYB

2.54

Chemicals - Specialty Industry

Max
13.69
Q3
9.06
Median
5.24
Q1
1.68
Min
-3.09

LYB’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.54 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Chemicals - Specialty industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

AU vs. LYB: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Gold and Chemicals - Specialty industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAULYB
Current Ratio (TTM)2.341.83
Quick Ratio (TTM)1.571.04
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.331.04
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.170.36
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)0.253.59
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)14.202.54

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AU and LYB. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AU vs. LYB: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AU vs. LYB: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AU vs. LYB: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AU

0.27%

Gold Industry

Max
3.65%
Q3
1.37%
Median
0.47%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AU’s Dividend Yield of 0.27% is consistent with its peers in the Gold industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

LYB

8.69%

Chemicals - Specialty Industry

Max
9.19%
Q3
2.44%
Median
1.46%
Q1
0.25%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 8.69%, LYB offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Chemicals - Specialty industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

AU vs. LYB: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Gold and Chemicals - Specialty industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AU

45.43%

Gold Industry

Max
110.70%
Q3
42.09%
Median
15.45%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AU’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 45.43% is in the upper quartile for the Gold industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

LYB

163.70%

Chemicals - Specialty Industry

Max
163.70%
Q3
57.04%
Median
30.02%
Q1
12.51%
Min
0.00%

LYB’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 163.70% is above 100%. This means the company is paying out more in dividends than it earned, a practice that is often unsustainable and could indicate a risk to future dividend stability.

AU vs. LYB: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Gold and Chemicals - Specialty industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAULYB
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.27%8.69%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)45.43%163.70%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AU

16.93

Gold Industry

Max
64.00
Q3
46.06
Median
29.03
Q1
16.74
Min
1.00

AU’s P/E Ratio of 16.93 is within the middle range for the Gold industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

LYB

18.85

Chemicals - Specialty Industry

Max
56.68
Q3
33.75
Median
23.45
Q1
16.09
Min
7.50

LYB’s P/E Ratio of 18.85 is within the middle range for the Chemicals - Specialty industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

AU vs. LYB: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Gold and Chemicals - Specialty industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AU

-0.86

Gold Industry

Max
14.01
Q3
6.52
Median
3.33
Q1
0.82
Min
0.05

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Gold industry.

LYB

0.45

Chemicals - Specialty Industry

Max
6.58
Q3
3.23
Median
1.64
Q1
0.96
Min
0.16

In the lower quartile for the Chemicals - Specialty industry, LYB’s Forward PEG Ratio of 0.45 is a positive indicator. It suggests that the stock may be attractively valued relative to its expected earnings growth.

AU vs. LYB: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Gold and Chemicals - Specialty industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AU

3.03

Gold Industry

Max
15.12
Q3
7.63
Median
3.25
Q1
2.30
Min
0.79

AU’s P/S Ratio of 3.03 aligns with the market consensus for the Gold industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

LYB

0.52

Chemicals - Specialty Industry

Max
3.76
Q3
2.31
Median
1.38
Q1
0.89
Min
0.16

In the lower quartile for the Chemicals - Specialty industry, LYB’s P/S Ratio of 0.52 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

AU vs. LYB: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Gold and Chemicals - Specialty industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AU

3.47

Gold Industry

Max
6.10
Q3
3.60
Median
2.02
Q1
1.35
Min
0.26

AU’s P/B Ratio of 3.47 is within the conventional range for the Gold industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

LYB

1.65

Chemicals - Specialty Industry

Max
6.73
Q3
3.78
Median
1.56
Q1
1.27
Min
0.35

LYB’s P/B Ratio of 1.65 is within the conventional range for the Chemicals - Specialty industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

AU vs. LYB: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Gold and Chemicals - Specialty industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAULYB
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)16.9318.85
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)-0.860.45
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)3.030.52
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)3.471.65
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)18.1313.16
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)7.9410.22
EV-to-Sales (TTM)3.130.81