Seek Returns logo

ATR vs. WST: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ATR and WST, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolATRWST
Company NameAptarGroup, Inc.West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorMaterialsHealth Care
GICS IndustryContainers & PackagingLife Sciences Tools & Services
Market Capitalization8.67 billion USD19.27 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateApril 23, 1993March 17, 1980
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ATR and WST by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ATR vs. WST: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolATRWST
5-Day Price Return-1.18%-1.91%
13-Week Price Return-17.60%18.46%
26-Week Price Return-11.48%21.80%
52-Week Price Return-17.06%-7.74%
Month-to-Date Return-1.53%2.13%
Year-to-Date Return-16.23%-18.20%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.39M0.62M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.43M0.67M
3-Month Volatility24.82%54.29%
Beta0.531.16

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

ATR

15.30%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
36.99%
Q3
19.86%
Median
10.47%
Q1
6.76%
Min
-0.20%

ATR’s Return on Equity of 15.30% is on par with the norm for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

WST

17.66%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
19.96%
Q3
11.51%
Median
6.47%
Q1
3.86%
Min
-6.95%

In the upper quartile for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, WST’s Return on Equity of 17.66% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

ATR vs. WST: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

ATR

10.86%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
10.84%
Q3
8.25%
Median
4.91%
Q1
3.65%
Min
-0.12%

ATR’s Net Profit Margin of 10.86% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Containers & Packaging industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

WST

16.48%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
32.18%
Q3
18.30%
Median
10.19%
Q1
4.20%
Min
-2.05%

WST’s Net Profit Margin of 16.48% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

ATR vs. WST: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

ATR

14.26%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
22.03%
Q3
13.09%
Median
8.06%
Q1
6.46%
Min
-0.07%

An Operating Profit Margin of 14.26% places ATR in the upper quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

WST

19.65%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
38.39%
Q3
21.40%
Median
13.57%
Q1
8.38%
Min
-3.51%

WST’s Operating Profit Margin of 19.65% is around the midpoint for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

ATR vs. WST: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolATRWST
Return on Equity (TTM)15.30%17.66%
Return on Assets (TTM)8.50%13.10%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)10.86%16.48%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)14.26%19.65%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)38.32%35.27%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ATR

1.21

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
1.96
Q3
1.45
Median
1.33
Q1
1.09
Min
0.87

ATR’s Current Ratio of 1.21 aligns with the median group of the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

WST

2.78

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
3.46
Q3
2.78
Median
1.91
Q1
1.53
Min
0.43

WST’s Current Ratio of 2.78 aligns with the median group of the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ATR vs. WST: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

ATR

0.40

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
4.15
Q3
2.03
Median
1.20
Q1
0.53
Min
0.23

Falling into the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, ATR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.40 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

WST

0.07

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
1.35
Q3
0.74
Median
0.41
Q1
0.18
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, WST’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.07 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

ATR vs. WST: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

ATR

16.67

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
13.16
Q3
8.10
Median
3.38
Q1
2.83
Min
1.06

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 16.67, ATR demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Containers & Packaging industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

WST

130.12

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
45.00
Q3
27.84
Median
7.16
Q1
2.12
Min
-14.08

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 130.12, WST demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

ATR vs. WST: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolATRWST
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.212.78
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.832.08
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.400.07
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)16.67130.12

Growth

Revenue Growth

ATR vs. WST: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

ATR vs. WST: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

ATR

1.38%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
7.14%
Q3
4.65%
Median
3.69%
Q1
2.00%
Min
0.00%

ATR’s Dividend Yield of 1.38% is in the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

WST

0.31%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
1.41%
Q3
0.65%
Median
0.35%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

WST’s Dividend Yield of 0.31% is consistent with its peers in the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

ATR vs. WST: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

ATR

30.61%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
222.75%
Q3
132.16%
Median
65.79%
Q1
28.53%
Min
0.00%

ATR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 30.61% is within the typical range for the Containers & Packaging industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

WST

12.32%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
113.14%
Q3
61.34%
Median
17.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

WST’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 12.32% is within the typical range for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

ATR vs. WST: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolATRWST
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.38%0.31%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)30.61%12.32%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

ATR

22.12

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
24.22
Q3
20.28
Median
17.07
Q1
15.06
Min
7.79

A P/E Ratio of 22.12 places ATR in the upper quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

WST

39.27

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
75.35
Q3
51.00
Median
32.93
Q1
25.27
Min
1.43

WST’s P/E Ratio of 39.27 is within the middle range for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

ATR vs. WST: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

ATR

2.40

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
1.99
Q3
1.17
Median
0.94
Q1
0.55
Min
0.31

With a P/S Ratio of 2.40, ATR trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Containers & Packaging industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

WST

6.47

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
10.49
Q3
6.43
Median
4.66
Q1
2.88
Min
1.08

WST’s P/S Ratio of 6.47 is in the upper echelon for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

ATR vs. WST: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

ATR

3.83

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
4.79
Q3
3.32
Median
2.14
Q1
1.60
Min
0.89

ATR’s P/B Ratio of 3.83 is in the upper tier for the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

WST

5.37

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
6.69
Q3
5.00
Median
3.46
Q1
2.38
Min
0.93

WST’s P/B Ratio of 5.37 is in the upper tier for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

ATR vs. WST: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolATRWST
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)22.1239.27
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.406.47
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.835.37
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)25.3555.68
ATR vs. WST: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison